Thymocyte self-renewal and oncogenic risk in immunodeficient mouse models: relevance for human gene therapy clinical trials targeting haematopoietic stem cell populations?

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 771-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha L. Ginn ◽  
Matthew P. McCormack ◽  
Ian E. Alexander
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naosuke Kamei ◽  
Kivanc Atesok ◽  
Mitsuo Ochi

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) derived from bone marrow and blood can differentiate into endothelial cells and promote neovascularization. In addition, EPCs are a promising cell source for the repair of various types of vascularized tissues and have been used in animal experiments and clinical trials for tissue repair. In this review, we focused on the kinetics of endogenous EPCs during tissue repair and the application of EPCs or stem cell populations containing EPCs for tissue regeneration in musculoskeletal and neural tissues including the bone, skeletal muscle, ligaments, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves. EPCs can be mobilized from bone marrow and recruited to injured tissue to contribute to neovascularization and tissue repair. In addition, EPCs or stem cell populations containing EPCs promote neovascularization and tissue repair through their differentiation to endothelial cells or tissue-specific cells, the upregulation of growth factors, and the induction and activation of endogenous stem cells. Human peripheral blood CD34(+) cells containing EPCs have been used in clinical trials of bone repair. Thus, EPCs are a promising cell source for the treatment of musculoskeletal and neural tissue injury.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 1117-1118
Author(s):  
Arthur Nienhuis ◽  
Theodore Friedmann

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3489-3489
Author(s):  
Ross Kinstrie ◽  
Dimitris Karamitros ◽  
Nicolas Goardon ◽  
Heather Morrison ◽  
Richard E Clark ◽  
...  

Abstract Blast phase (BP)-CML remains the most critical area of unmet clinical need in the management of CML and novel, targeted therapeutic strategies are urgently needed. In the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, the rate of progression to BP is 1 to 1.5% per annum in the first few years after diagnosis, falling sharply when major molecular response is obtained. Around 10% of patients present with de novo BP-CML and despite the use of TKIs, median survival after the diagnosis of BP-CML is between 6.5 and 11 months.Therefore, improved understanding of the biology of BP-CML and novel therapies to prolong therapeutic responses are urgently sought. Studies of myeloid malignancies show that acquisition of tumor-associated mutations occurs principally in a step-wise manner. Initiating mutations usually originate in an hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) to give rise to preleukemic stem cell populations that expand through clonal advantage. Further mutation acquisition and/or epigenetic changes then lead to blast transformation and disruption of the normal immunophenotypic and functional hematopoietic hierarchy. At this stage, multiple leukemic stem cell (LSC) populations (also termed leukemia initiating cell populations) can be identified. We previously showed, in AML, that the CD34+ LSC populations were most closely related to normal progenitor populations, rather than stem cell populations, but had co-opted elements of a normal stem cell expression signature to acquire abnormal self-renewal potential (Goardon et al, Cancer Cell, 2011). CD34+CD38- LSCs were most commonly similar to an early multi-potent progenitor population with lympho-myeloid potential (the lymphoid-primed multi-potential progenitor [LMPP]). In contrast, the CD34+CD38+ LSCs were most closely related to the more restricted granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (GMP). In chronic phase CML, the leukemia-propagating population is the HSC, and the progenitor subpopulations do not have stem cell characteristics. To date, studies to isolate LSC populations in BP-CML have been limited, identifying the GMP subpopulation only as a possible LSC source (Jamieson et al, NEJM, 2004). Furthermore, in vivo LSC activity has not been assessed. We therefore set out to assess the LSC characteristics of different primitive progenitor subpopulations in myeloid BP-CML both in vitro and in vivo. We isolated different stem and progenitor cell subpopulations using FACS; HSC (Lin-CD34+CD38-CD90+ CD45RA-), multipotent progenitor (MPP; Lin-CD34+CD38-CD90-CD45RA-), LMPP (Lin-CD34+CD38-CD90-CD45RA+), common myeloid progenitor (CMP; Lin-CD34+CD38+CD45RA-CD123+), GMP (Lin-CD34+CD38+CD45RA+CD123+) and megakaryocyte erythroid progenitor (MEP; Lin-CD34+CD38+CD45RA-CD123-). The functional potential of these purified populations was examined in 13 patients by: (i) serial CFC replating assays to study progenitor self-renewal (n=10); (ii) In vivo xenograft studies using NSG mice with serial transplantation to identify populations with LSC potential (n=6). Our data conclusively demonstrate that functional LSCs are present in multiple immunophenotypic stem/progenitor subpopulations in myeloid BP-CML, including HSC, MPP, LMPP, CMP and GMP subpopulations. There was inter-patient variability in terms of both in vitro and in vivo functional properties. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was used to assess clonality in the different progenitor subpopulations and identify which populations contained cells with additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) with a view to improving our understanding of the clonal hierarchy. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in ACAs in the different progenitor subpopulations in the majority of samples studied, suggesting that clonal evolution tends to occur in the HSC compartment in myeloid BP-CML. Preliminary gene expression profiling studies of the different progenitor subpopulations, using Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Arrays, demonstrated highly variable gene expression, supporting the functional heterogeneity seen. Taken together, our results demonstrate that myeloid BP-CML is a very heterogeneous disorder with variable LSC populations. Further interrogation of these populations will likely identify novel therapies which will specifically target the LSC. Disclosures Copland: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Eddleman ◽  
Frank A. Chervenak ◽  
Patricia George-Siegel ◽  
Giovanni Migliaccio ◽  
Anna Rita Migliaccio

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0135760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiya Sugimori ◽  
Yumiko Hayakawa ◽  
Bruce M. Boman ◽  
Jeremy Z. Fields ◽  
Miharu Awaji ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick L. Hitti ◽  
Andrew I. Yang ◽  
Pedro Gonzalez-Alegre ◽  
Gordon H. Baltuch

Hematology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 (1) ◽  
pp. 376-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Williams ◽  
Arthur W. Nienhuis ◽  
Robert G. Hawley ◽  
Franklin O. Smith

Abstract This article reviews 1) the use of gene transfer methods to genetically manipulate hematopoietic stem cell targets, 2) recent advances in technology that are addressing problems that have prevented widespread successful translation of gene transfer approaches for the cure of disease, and 3) recent regulatory issues related to human gene therapy trials. In Section I, Dr. Nienhuis describes the use of alternative viral envelopes and vector systems to improve efficiency of transduction of hematopoietic stem cells. Major limitations of stem cell transduction are related to low levels of viral receptors on the stem cells of large animal species and the low frequency of cycling stem cells in the bone marrow. Attempts to circumvent these limitations by exploiting non-oncoretroviral vectors and pseudotyping of Moloney vectors with alternative envelopes are discussed. In Section II, Dr. Hawley addresses new strategies to improve the expression of transgenes in cells derived from long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells. Transgene silencing in transduced hematopoietic stem cells remains an obstacle to gene therapy for some gene sequences. New generations of retroviral backbones designed to both improve expression and reduce silencing in primary cells are explored. In Section III, Drs. Smith and Cornetta update regulatory issues related to human gene therapy trials. Increased scrutiny of human trials has led to changes in requirements and shifts in emphasis of existing regulations, which apply to human gene therapy trials. The current Food and Drug Administration's structure and regulations and the roles of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee of the NIH and other sponsors and partners in gene therapy trials are reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document