Association between coronary artery calcium score on non-contrast chest computed tomography and all-cause mortality among patients with congestive heart failure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Ota ◽  
Rine Nakanishi ◽  
Hidenobu Hashimoto ◽  
Yuriko Okamura ◽  
Ippei Watanabe ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenobu Hashimoto ◽  
Rine Nakanishi ◽  
Sunao Mizumura ◽  
Yukiko Hashimoto ◽  
Yuriko Okamura ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to determine whether coronary artery calcium score (CACS) can be a prognostic indicator for the development of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and compare the value of CACS with that of the 123I-betamethyl-p-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid (123I-BMIPP) defect score (BDS) in patients with non-ischemic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (NIHFpEF). Methods Among 643 consecutive patients hospitalized due to acute heart failure, 108 (74 ± 13y) were identified to have NIHFpEF on non-contrast regular chest computed tomography and 123I-BMIPP single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). We evaluated whether CACS and BDS were associated with MACEs using multivariate Cox models. Results Thirty-two MACEs developed at a mean follow-up period of 2.4 years. Higher CACS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10–4.67) and higher BDS (HR 22.14, 95% CI 7.95–61.60) were significantly associated with the development of MACEs. Patients showing higher CACS and BDS carried a significantly higher risk for developing MACE (HR 23.65, 95% CI 10.33–54.13, p < 0.001). Conclusion CACS, as well as BDS, could serve as potential prognostic indicators in patients with NIHFpEF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1220
Author(s):  
Thomas Senoner ◽  
Fabian Plank ◽  
Christoph Beyer ◽  
Christian Langer ◽  
Katharina Birkl ◽  
...  

Background: The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a powerful tool for cardiovascular risk stratification. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) allows for a more distinct analysis of atherosclerosis. The aim of the study was to assess gender differences in the atherosclerosis profile of CTA in patients with a CACS of zero. Methods: A total of 1451 low- to intermediate-risk patients (53 ± 11 years; 51% females) with CACS <1.0 Agatston units (AU) who underwent CTA and CACS were included. Males and females were 1:1 propensity score-matched. CTA was evaluated for stenosis severity (Coronary Artery Disease – Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) 0–5: minimal <25%, mild 25–49%, moderate 50–69%, severe ≥70%), mixed-plaque burden (G-score), and high-risk plaque (HRP) criteria (low-attenuation plaque, spotty calcification, napkin-ring sign, and positive remodeling). All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major cardiovascular events (MACEs) were collected. Results: Among the patients, 88.8% had a CACS of 0 and 11.2% had an ultralow CACS of 0.1–0.9 AU. More males than females (32.1% vs. 20.3%; p < 0.001) with a CACS of 0 had atherosclerosis, while, among those with an ultralow CACS, there was no difference (88% vs. 87.1%). Nonobstructive CAD (25.9% vs. 16.2%; p < 0.001), total plaque burden (2.2 vs. 1.4; p < 0.001), and HRP were found more often in males (p < 0.001). After a follow-up of mean 6.6 ± 4.2 years, all-cause mortality was higher in females (3.5% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.023). Cardiovascular mortality and MACEs were low (0.2% vs. 0%; p = 0.947 and 0.3% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.790) for males vs. females, respectively. Females were more often symptomatic for chest pain (70% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.004). (4) Conclusions: In patients with a CACS of 0, males had a higher prevalence of atherosclerosis, a higher noncalcified plaque burden, and more HRP criteria. Nonetheless, females had a worse long–term outcome and were more frequently symptomatic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document