Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Petersen ◽  
M. Freitag ◽  
G. Hellmich ◽  
K. Ludwig
Author(s):  
Petrus Boström ◽  
Johan Svensson ◽  
Camilla Brorsson ◽  
Martin Rutegård

Abstract Purpose Even though anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery is a major clinical problem in need of a timely diagnosis, early indicators of leakage have been insufficiently studied. We therefore conducted a population-based observational study to determine whether the patient’s early postoperative pain is an independent marker of anastomotic leakage. Methods By combining the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and the Swedish Perioperative Registry, we retrieved prospectively collected data on 3084 patients who underwent anastomotic colorectal surgery for cancer in 2014–2017. Postoperative pain, measured with the numerical rating scale (NRS), was considered exposure, while anastomotic leakage and reoperation due to leakage were outcomes. We performed logistic regression to evaluate associations, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), while multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Results In total, 189 patients suffered from anastomotic leakage, of whom 121 patients also needed a reoperation due to leakage. Moderate or severe postoperative pain (NRS 4–10) was associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.21–2.38), as well as reoperation (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.41–3.32). Severe pain (NRS 8–10) was more strongly related to leakage (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.44–3.93). These associations were confirmed in multivariable analyses and when reoperation due to leakage was used as an outcome. Conclusion In this population-based retrospective study on prospectively collected data, increased pain in the post-anaesthesia care unit is an independent marker of anastomotic leakage, possibly indicating a need for further diagnostic measures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Popescu ◽  
Daniela Sala ◽  
Miana Gliga ◽  
Sergiu Ciulic ◽  
Radu Mircea Neagoe ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ulanska ◽  
A. Dziki ◽  
W. Langner

Traditionally, the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients may be predicted by pathological staging by either Dukes staging or the UICC-TNM system. However, some of Dukes stage A (approximately 10% of patients) and Dukes B patients (30-40%) will develop local recurrence or distant metastasis years after receiving standard surgical treatments. Therefore it is important to find some other indicators that can predict for recurrence so that we can screen for high-risk early-stage patients who may need preventive chemotherapy or other adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study is determination of risk factor for local recurrence in rectal cancer. In this study there has been used and summarized also research records and publications from different clinical hospitals according to actual international literature. Part of elements connected with patient, tumor and genetic and immunological factors remains independent on curative procedures. However better investigation these factors might affect on therapy, frequency of follow-up examinations, and help to detect recurrence at very early phase. Concomitant treatment factors are able to be moderate by surgeons and therapeutics. Therefore precise definition of risk factors might be helpful in decrease recurrence rate in patients with rectal cancer.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 759-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Snijders ◽  
D Henneman ◽  
N L van Leersum ◽  
M ten Berge ◽  
M Fiocco ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-94
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Imanishi ◽  
Hideaki Miyauchi ◽  
Michihiro Maruyama ◽  
Gaku Ohira ◽  
Tetsuro Maruyama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document