The association between glycemic index, glycemic load, and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Yu Zhang ◽  
Yu-Ting Jiang ◽  
Ya-Shu Liu ◽  
Qing Chang ◽  
Yu-Hong Zhao ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Sadeghi ◽  
Omid Sadeghi ◽  
Mahmoud Khodadost ◽  
Aliyar Pirouzi ◽  
Banafsheh Hosseini ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 4166-4171 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Greenwood ◽  
D. E. Threapleton ◽  
C. E. L. Evans ◽  
C. L. Cleghorn ◽  
C. Nykjaer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (07) ◽  
pp. 723-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mijin Lee ◽  
Miso Lim ◽  
Jihye Kim

AbstractA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were performed to assess the dose–response associations between fruit or vegetable consumption and the chance of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). Studies on the association between fruit or vegetable consumption and the risk of the MetS published from January 1958 to 30 October 2018 were searched using the PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases, and the references of relevant articles were reviewed. Random-effects models were used to estimate the summary OR with 95 % CI for the MetS, and dose–response analysis was conducted to quantify the associations. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using Q and I2 statistics. A total of nine observational studies (seven cross-sectional studies and two cohort studies) were included in the meta-analysis. In a dose–response analysis of cohort studies and cross-sectional studies, the summary estimate of the MetS for an increase of 100 g/d in fruit consumption (nine studies) was 0·97 (95 % CI 0·95, 0·99; I2 = 26·7 %), whereas an increase of 100 g/d in vegetable consumption (nine studies) was not associated with a reduction in the MetS (OR 0·98; 95 % CI 0·96, 1·01; I2 = 54·6 %). In conclusion, an increased intake of fruit may reduce the risk of the MetS. For future research, prospective studies or randomised clinical trials are needed to identify the effects of fruits and vegetables by variety on the risk of the MetS.


2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 420-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Schlesinger ◽  
Doris S.M. Chan ◽  
Snieguole Vingeliene ◽  
Ana R. Vieira ◽  
Leila Abar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1872-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jayedi ◽  
Ali Rashidy-Pour ◽  
Mohammad Parohan ◽  
Mahdieh Sadat Zargar ◽  
Sakineh Shab-Bidar

AbstractObjectiveThe present review aimed to quantify the association of dietary intake and circulating concentration of major dietary antioxidants with risk of total CVD mortality.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.SettingSystematic search in PubMed and Scopus, up to October 2017.ParticipantsProspective observational studies reporting risk estimates of CVD mortality across three or more categories of dietary intakes and/or circulating concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin E and β-carotene were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsA total of fifteen prospective cohort studies and three prospective evaluations within interventional studies (320 548 participants and 16 974 cases) were analysed. The relative risks of CVD mortality for the highest v. the lowest category of antioxidant intakes were as follows: vitamin C, 0·79 (95 % CI 0·68, 0·89; I2=46 %, n 10); vitamin E, 0·91 (95 % CI 0·79, 1·03; I2=51 %, n 8); β-carotene, 0·89 (95 % CI 0·73, 1·05; I2=34 %, n 4). The relative risks for circulating concentrations were: vitamin C, 0·60 (95 % CI 0·42, 0·78; I2=65 %, n 6); α-tocopherol, 0·82 (95 % CI 0·76, 0·88; I2=0 %, n 5); β-carotene, 0·68 (95 % CI 0·52, 0·83; I2=50 %, n 6). Dose–response meta-analyses demonstrated that the circulating biomarkers of antioxidants were more strongly associated with risk of CVD mortality than dietary intakes.ConclusionsThe present meta-analysis demonstrates that higher vitamin C intake and higher circulating concentrations of vitamin C, vitamin E and β-carotene are associated with a lower risk of CVD mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document