The impact of non-tumor-derived circulating nucleic acids implicates the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanida Vinayanuwattikun ◽  
Pakorn Winayanuwattikun ◽  
Poonchavist Chantranuwat ◽  
Apiwat Mutirangura ◽  
Virote Sriuranpong
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Circulating Nucleic Acids ◽  
The Impact

Do we Need Maintenance Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC in the Era of Immune and Targeted Therapy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Ahmed Nagy ◽  
Omar Abdel Rahman ◽  
Heba Abdullah ◽  
Ahmed Negida
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Maintenance Chemotherapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Impact

Background: Although well established for the effective management of hematologic cancers, maintenance chemotherapy has only been recently incorportated as a treatment paradigm for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Maintenance chemotherapy aims to prolong a clinically favorable response state achieved after finishing induction therapy which is usually predefined in number before startng treatment. There are 2 modalities for maintenance therapy; continuation maintenance (involving a non-platinum component which was a part of the induction protocol or a targeted agent) and switch maintenance therapy (utilizing a new agent which was not a part of the induction regimen). Methods: The purpose of this article is to review the role of maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and provide a brief overview about induction chemotherapy in NSCLC to address the basis of maintenance therapy as a treatment option. We will also compare the impact of maintenance chemotherapy with the now evolving role of immunotherapy in NSCLC. Results: There have been 4 maintenance studies to date showing prolonged PFS and OS with statistical significance. However, Three out of the four studies (ECOG4599, JMEN, and PARAMOUNT) did not report tumor molecular analysis. As regard Immunotherapy, current data is in favour of strongly an increasing role for immunotherapy in NSCLC. Conclusion: Maintenance therapy in NSCLC continues to be an important therapeutic line to improve outcome in patients with metastatic and recurrent disease.

scholarly journals 479P The impact of initial symptoms on survival time in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. ix153-ix154
Author(s):  
T. Miyawaki ◽  
S. Yagishita ◽  
R. Ko ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
N. Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Initial Symptoms ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Differential influence of antibiotic therapy and other medications on oncological outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus cytotoxic chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e002421
Author(s):  
Alessio Cortellini ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Olga Nigro ◽  
Alessandro Leonetti ◽  
Diego L Cortinovis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundSome concomitant medications including antibiotics (ATB) have been reproducibly associated with worse survival following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in unselected patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (according to programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and treatment line). Whether such relationship is causative or associative is matter of debate.MethodsWe present the outcomes analysis according to concomitant baseline medications (prior to ICI initiation) with putative immune-modulatory effects in a large cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression ≥50%, receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. We also evaluated a control cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line chemotherapy. The interaction between key medications and therapeutic modality (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy) was validated in pooled multivariable analyses.Results950 and 595 patients were included in the pembrolizumab and chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. Corticosteroid and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy but not ATB therapy was associated with poorer performance status at baseline in both the cohorts. No association with clinical outcomes was found according to baseline statin, aspirin, β-blocker and metformin within the pembrolizumab cohort. On the multivariable analysis, ATB emerged as a strong predictor of worse overall survival (OS) (HR=1.42 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.79); p=0.0024), and progression free survival (PFS) (HR=1.29 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.59); p=0.0192) in the pembrolizumab but not in the chemotherapy cohort. Corticosteroids were associated with shorter PFS (HR=1.69 (95% CI 1.42 to 2.03); p<0.0001), and OS (HR=1.93 (95% CI 1.59 to 2.35); p<0.0001) following pembrolizumab, and shorter PFS (HR=1.30 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.56), p=0.0046) and OS (HR=1.58 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.94), p<0.0001), following chemotherapy. PPIs were associated with worse OS (HR=1.49 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.77); p<0.0001) with pembrolizumab and shorter OS (HR=1.12 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.24), p=0.0139), with chemotherapy. At the pooled analysis, there was a statistically significant interaction with treatment (pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy) for corticosteroids (p=0.0020) and PPIs (p=0.0460) with respect to OS, for corticosteroids (p<0.0001), ATB (p=0.0290), and PPIs (p=0.0487) with respect to PFS, and only corticosteroids (p=0.0033) with respect to objective response rate.ConclusionIn this study, we validate the significant negative impact of ATB on pembrolizumab monotherapy but not chemotherapy outcomes in NSCLC, producing further evidence about their underlying immune-modulatory effect. Even though the magnitude of the impact of corticosteroids and PPIs is significantly different across the cohorts, their effects might be driven by adverse disease features.

Outcome of patients with small-cell lung cancer: effect of changes in staging procedures and imaging technology on prognostic factors over 14 years.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
M P Dearing ◽  
S M Steinberg ◽  
R Phelps ◽  
M J Anderson ◽  
J L Mulshine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
The Impact

In a study of 411 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) entered on therapeutic clinical trials between 1973 and 1987, we analyzed whether changes in the prognostic importance of pretreatment factors had occurred during the 14-year time period. After adjusting for other prognostic factors, brain involvement was associated with shorter survival in patients treated before December 1979 (P = .024) but not in patients treated thereafter (P = .54). The patients diagnosed before 1979 had brain metastases documented by radionuclide scan while computed cranial tomography (CCT) was more commonly used after 1979. Patients who had brain metastases diagnosed by radionuclide scan lived a shorter period of time than patients who had the diagnosis made by the more sensitive CCT scan (P = .031). In contrast, Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that liver metastases in patients were associated with shorter survival in patients treated after 1979 (P = .0007) but not in patients treated before then (P = .30). A larger proportion of patients had a routine liver biopsy before 1979 than after 1979 when more patients had the liver staged with less sensitive imaging studies and biochemical parameters. Patients with SCLC whose cancer was confined to the thorax but had medical or anatomic contraindications to intensive chest radiotherapy had similar survival compared with patients with limited-stage SCLC who were treated with combination chemotherapy alone (P = .68). From these data we conclude: (1) the sensitivity of the staging procedures used can affect the impact on survival of cancer involvement of a given site; and (2) patients with cancer confined to their chest with medical or anatomic contraindications to chest radiotherapy do not have a shorter survival than patients with limited-stage disease treated with chemotherapy alone.

Pemetrexed Versus Pemetrexed and Carboplatin As Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the GOIRC 02-2006 Randomized Phase II Study and Pooled Analysis With the NVALT7 Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (36) ◽  
pp. 4501-4507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ardizzoni ◽  
Marcello Tiseo ◽  
Luca Boni ◽  
Andrew D. Vincent ◽  
Rodolfo Passalacqua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To compare efficacy of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC, in progression during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed (arm A) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A preplanned pooled analysis of the results of this study with those of the NVALT7 study was carried out to assess the impact of carboplatin added to pemetrexed in terms of overall survival (OS). Results From July 2007 to October 2009, 239 patients (arm A, n = 120; arm B, n = 119) were enrolled. Median PFS was 3.6 months for arm A versus 3.5 months for arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.36; P = .706). No statistically significant differences in response rate, OS, or toxicity were observed. A total of 479 patients were included in the pooled analysis. OS was not improved by the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed (HR, 90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.10; P = .316; P heterogeneity = .495). In the subgroup analyses, the addition of carboplatin to pemetrexed in patients with squamous tumors led to a statistically significant improvement in OS from 5.4 to 9 months (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.91; P interaction test = .039). Conclusion Second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with pemetrexed plus carboplatin does not improve survival outcomes as compared with single-agent pemetrexed. The benefit observed with carboplatin addition in squamous tumors may warrant further investigation.

Successful treatment of pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis by anlotinib in 14 Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21064-e21064
Author(s):  
Shencun Fang ◽  
Wanwan Cheng ◽  
Yingming Zhang ◽  
Haitao Zhang ◽  
Si Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Lymphatic Metastasis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis

e21064 Background: Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC) occurs in 6%-8% of intrathoracic metastases among malignant tumor. The median survival was only 2.0 months from time of pulmonary symptoms to death in cases during 2000-2018, which is a poor prognosis. Effective interventions were needed besides standard chemotherapy and symptomatic support. Anlotinib showed a critical effect on lymphangiogenesis, and lymphatic metastasis in mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma, it might be a therapeutic option for tumor lymphatic metastasis. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for PLC in patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively investigated NSCLC patients with PLC at our hospital between May 2018 and November 2020, who received anlotinib monotherapy or combined therapy for PLC. Data were analyzed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate(ORR), disease control rate(DCR) and adverse events (AE). The impact of clinical and genomic factors on PFS and OS were also assessed. Results: A total of 14 patients were enrolled with a median age of 64 years. 10(71.4%) were male, 4(28.6%) has smoking history, 10(71.4%) of patients had a performance status of 2-3. 9, 3, 2 patients had TP53 mutation, EGFR mutation, ALK fusion respectively. 9(64.3%) patients received anlotinib monotherapy. Of 14 patients, 8 achieved partial response (PR), 5 presented stable disease (SD), 1 had progressed disease. The ORR and DCR were 57.1% and 92.9% respectively. The median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.0-4.2), the median OS for 1, 2, ≥3 line were 13 months, 7.2 months, 5.2 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS (≥3 line) were significantly longer for patients with TP53-mutant tumors compared with those with TP53–wild-type tumors (median PFS: 7 vs. 1.1 months, median OS (≥3 line): 6.8 vs. 1.9 months). No difference of PFS and OS (≥3 line) was found between EGFR or ALK alteration and the corresponding wild type patients. The most frequently reported AEs were high blood pressure (11, 78.6%), hand foot syndrome (6, 42.9%), diarrhea (5, 35.7%), fatigue (4, 28.6%), hoarseness (3, 21.4%), proteinuria (2, 14.3%) and stomatitis (2, 14.3%). Conclusions: Anlotinib presented favorable efficacy in patients with pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis and conferred considerable survival benefit compared with previous studies, especially in patients harboring TP53 mutations. The AEs were manageable. These indicated that anlotinib can be a promising therapeutic treatment of PLC. More clinical data is needed to validate this finding.

The impact of high PD-L1 expression on the surrogate endpoints and clinical outcomes of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Ito ◽  
Satoru Miura ◽  
Tadashi Sakaguchi ◽  
Kenta Murotani ◽  
Nobuyuki Horita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Surrogate Endpoints ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document