Assessing the impact of diagnosis and the related supportive care needs in patients with cutaneous melanoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 779-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Stamataki ◽  
L. Brunton ◽  
P. Lorigan ◽  
A. C. Green ◽  
J. Newton-Bishop ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 2052-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Molassiotis ◽  
L. Brunton ◽  
J. Hodgetts ◽  
A.C. Green ◽  
V.L. Beesley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Sharp ◽  
Heather Lamb ◽  
Nikki Jordan ◽  
Adrienne Edwards ◽  
Rachel Gunary ◽  
...  

ObjectivesPalliative care is underused in non-malignant respiratory diseases, including interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). We investigated current practices around palliative and supportive care and explored the impact of a supportive care decision aid tool.MethodsThis was a single centre study in a UK ILD centre. Retrospective analysis of hospice referrals and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) under the Bristol ILD (BILD) service were used to identify unmet palliative and supportive care needs. Using quality improvement methodology, we explored the impact of a supportive care decision aid on clinician behaviours for patients with ILD.Results108 patients with ILD were referred for hospice care between 2010 and 2015, representing 0.15% of all referrals, compared with a population prevalence of IPF of 0.9%. The median interval between referral and death was 124 days.Records were reviewed for 64 deceased and 89 living patients with IPF seen on July–December 2014. The decision aid was prospectively assessed with 73 patients. The deceased patients had greater markers of severity. There were no other differences between the groups.After introduction, the decision aid tool was completed for 49.3% of patients and resulted in significant increases in documented discussion of referral to palliative care (11.2%vs53.6%, p<0.01) and end-of-life discussions (15.7%vs91.8%, p<0.01). Tool completion led to an increase in referral for palliative care (2.7%vs16.7%, p<0.01).ConclusionPalliative care services are underused in ILD and a supportive care decision aid can prompt consideration of palliative and supportive care needs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhasker Amatya ◽  
Fary Khan ◽  
Louisa Ng ◽  
Mary Galea

Objective. To assess and identify patient-reported supportive care needs following definitive treatment in persons with breast cancer (BC) and primary brain tumours (gliomas) (BT) in an Australian community cohort and to assess the commonalities and/or discrepancies of the reported needs in these oncological populations. Methods. A prospective cross-sectional survey of persons with BC (n=85) and BT (n=106) using questionnaires for supportive care needs, psychological morbidity, and quality of life. Results. BT participants were younger than BC patients (mean ages 51 and 57 years). The median time since diagnosis for both groups was over 2 years. The level of psychological morbidity, mainly depression, was high in both groups: BC (22%) and BT (20%). Participants in both groups reported at least one need (“met” or “unmet”). The BC patients reported higher numbers of “needs” and “unmet” needs compared with BT patients (mean 13.7 versus 11.6 needs; “unmet” needs mean 6.0 versus 4.1). The common “met” and “unmet” needs highlighted by both groups were comparable; the domain for most “met” needs included comprehensive cancer care, while “unmet” needs related to existential survivorship issues. Conclusion. Despite successful treatment many cancer survivors experience unmet supportive care needs in longer term. Understanding the impact of these beyond the acute phase is important as care shifts to community settings. More research in existential survivorship issues is needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa L. Beesley ◽  
B. Mark Smithers ◽  
Peter O’Rourke ◽  
Monika Janda ◽  
Kiarash Khosrotehrani ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 763-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa L. Beesley ◽  
B. Mark Smithers ◽  
Kiarash Khosrotehrani ◽  
Mohsina Khatun ◽  
Peter O'Rourke ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S23-S23
Author(s):  
K. Dainty ◽  
B. Seaton ◽  
V. Rojas-Luengas ◽  
S. McLeod ◽  
M. Tunde-Byass ◽  
...  

Introduction: Women experiencing early pregnancy loss or threatened loss frequently seek care in emergency departments (ED) or early pregnancy clinics (EPC). The dearth of existing qualitative studies has left understudied questions about how these women perceive their healthcare and which strategies best meet their supportive care needs, particularly in the Canadian context. The objective of this study was to deepen our understanding of these women's experiences and gain insight into how clinicians and healthcare services can lessen the impact of this traumatic event on patients and their families. Methods: We conducted a descriptive qualitative study of women who presented to the ED or EPC at an urban tertiary care hospital and an urban community hospital for early pregnancy loss or threatened loss. Purposive sampling was used to recruit patients for in-depth, one-on-one telephone interviews conducted 4-6 weeks after the index visit. Data collection and analysis were concurrent and continued until thematic saturation had occurred. Data analysis was led by two qualitative researchers with support from a multi-disciplinary research team following standard thematic analysis techniques. Results: Interviews were completed with 59 women between July 2018 and August 2019. Participants ranged in age from 22 to 47 years and reflect the diversity of the multicultural city where the study occurred. Our analysis revealed that the medicalization and normalization of early pregnancy complications among ED and EPC clinicians is at odds with women's general lack of knowledge about the frequency, personal risk, causation, duration, and physical intensity of the miscarriage experience. Women identified the value of rapid access to appointments, point of care ultrasound, detailed care plans, and knowledgeable advice as key to lessening the physical and emotional trauma related to early pregnancy loss. Conclusion: This research highlights the physical, emotional, and psychological complexity of a medical situation frequently minimized within the current healthcare system. The results impart important knowledge about which aspects of ED and EPC care are most valued by women experiencing early pregnancy loss or threatened loss and demonstrate the clear need for women and their families to be provided with more education about the totality of the early pregnancy experience, including the possibility of pregnancy complications and loss.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
Kate Webber ◽  
Olivia Cook ◽  
Michelle White ◽  
Alastair Kwok ◽  
Eva Segelov

195 Background: PROMs and PREMs may be useful tools to reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients’ wellbeing and care. This analysis compares baseline self-reported quality of life (QoL), symptoms and supportive care needs between two independent patient groups based on when and how they attended their oncology appointment: 1) in person, prior to the global declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic and; 2) via telehealth, during the pandemic. Methods: Patients were invited to complete a suite of PROMs and PREMs including the EQ-5D-5L, modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-R) and the modified Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form (SCNS-SF34) on an iPad in the waiting room before each appointment (pre-COVID-19 pandemic phase, December 2019 to March 2020) or online prior to a telehealth appointment (COVID-19 pandemic phase, October 2020 to April 2021). Descriptive statistics were reported for clinical and demographic factors and the PROMs and PREMs. Baseline scores from pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohorts were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: In the pre-COVID-19 phase, 100 patients (99 females, 60.7 years old) participated compared with 129 patients (128 females, 59.7 years old) in the COVID-19 phase. Primary cancer diagnoses were breast (pre-COVID-19 68%, COVID-19 71%), gynaecological (pre-COVID-19 31%, COVID-19 37%) and lung (pre-COVID-19 1%) cancers. Mean age, gender, relationship status, language spoken, cancer diagnoses, and staging were similar, all p > 0.05. Median self-rated health (EQ-VAS score) was also similar between the pre-COVID-19 phase (74, IQR 33) and the COVID-19 phase (75, IQR 34), p = 0.51. Median ESAS-R swelling/lymphoedema score was higher for the COVID-19 phase (1, IQR 3) than the pre-COVID-19 phase (0, IQR 3), p = 0.03. Median SCNS standardised psychological domain score was lower for the COVID-19 phase (35, IQR 40) compared with the pre-COVID-19 phase (45, IQR 42), p = 0.03. No other significant differences in symptoms or unmet needs were noted (all p > 0.05). The top three symptoms concerns (ESAS-R score ≥7) were: 1) tiredness (pre-COVID-19 33%, COVID-19 22.7%); 2) sleep problems (pre-COVID-19 24.5%, COVID-19 21.9%); 3) drowsiness (pre-COVID-19 21.2%) and concentration and memory (COVID-19 19.5%). Conclusions: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, these data reflect the symptoms and concerns impacting on the QoL among Australian oncology patients have remained largely stable. Although Australian COVID-19 case numbers have remained low, PROMs and PREMs are crucial tools for continuing to support oncology patients with QoL and supportive needs in the pandemic era. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619001470189.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (36) ◽  
pp. 6172-6179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Armes ◽  
Maggie Crowe ◽  
Lynne Colbourne ◽  
Helen Morgan ◽  
Trevor Murrells ◽  
...  

Purpose To estimate prevalence and severity of patients' self-perceived supportive care needs in the immediate post-treatment phase and identify predictors of unmet need. Patients and Methods A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal survey was conducted. Sixty-six centers recruited patients for 12 weeks. Patients receiving treatment for the following cancers were recruited: breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Measures of supportive care needs, anxiety and depression, fear of recurrence, and positive and negative affect were completed at the end of treatment (T0) and 6 months later (T1). Results Of 1,850 patients given questionnaire packs, 1,425 (79%) returned questionnaires at T0, and 1,152 (62%) returned questionnaires at T1. Mean age was 61 years; and most respondents were female (69%) and had breast cancer (57%). Most patients had no or few moderate or severe unmet supportive care needs. However, 30% reported more than five unmet needs at baseline, and for 60% of these patients, the situation did not improve. At both assessments, the most frequently endorsed unmet needs were psychological needs and fear of recurrence. Logistic regression revealed several statistically significant predictors of unmet need, including receipt of hormone treatment, negative affect, and experiencing an unrelated significant event between assessments. Conclusion Most patients do not express unmet needs for supportive care after treatment. Thirty percent reported more than five moderate or severe unmet needs at both assessments. Unmet needs were predicted by hormone treatment, negative mood, and experiencing a significant event. Our results suggest that there is a proportion of survivors with unmet needs who might benefit from the targeted application of psychosocial resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document