scholarly journals Validity of a single-item indicator of treatment side effect bother in a diverse sample of cancer patients

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pip Griffiths ◽  
John Devin Peipert ◽  
Andrea Leith ◽  
Alex Rider ◽  
Lucy Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Real World ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose With higher efficacy of cancer therapies, the numbers and types of side effects experienced by patients have also increased, evidencing a need for brief assessments of side effect bother. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) includes the item “I am bothered by side effects of treatment” (GP5). This study aimed to confirm GP5’s validity in a large, diverse, real-world patient sample. Methods Real-world data were drawn from 10 Adelphi Disease Specific Programmes (DSP™) conducted between 2015 and 2019 in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA, covering 10 cancer sites. We examined correlations between GP5 responses and varied measures of patient-reported global health and the number of side effects experienced. We explored whether more advanced patients and those with worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Rating (ECOG PSR) reported greater side effect bother. Finally, we conducted differential item functioning (DIF) assessment using the Mantel–Haenszel approach. Results The sample included 6755 advanced cancer patients. GP5 responses were distributed similarly across most cancer sites. A moderate, negative correlation (rpolyserial =  − 0.43) between GP5 responses and global health evidenced convergent validity. Known groups validity was evidenced by dichotomised distributions of GP5, showing expected results between cancer stage 2 vs. 3 and 4 and with ECOG PSR (p < 0.001). Little evidence of DIF was found. Conclusion GP5 exhibited evidence of validity across cancer sites and countries and appeared to measure the same construct across these countries. GP5 has significant promise as a summary indicator of side effect bother.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients with Advanced Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Real-World: Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1388
Author(s):  
Manlio Mencoboni ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
Paola Taveggia ◽  
Alessia Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

Immunotherapy based on anti PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is the new standard of advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab and atezolizumab are used in clinical practice. The strict eligibility criteria of clinical trials do not allow researchers to fully represent treatment effects in the patients that will ultimately use these drugs. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these drugs, and more generally of ICIs, as second-line therapy in NSCLC patients in real world practice. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched to include original studies published between January 2015 and April 2020. A total of 32 studies was included in the meta-analysis. The overall radiological response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21%, 52%, 3.35 months and 9.98 months, respectively. The results did not change when analysis was adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and age. A unitary increase in the percent of patients with liver and CNS metastases reduced the occurrence of DCR by 7% (p < 0.001) and the median PFS by 2% (p = 0.010), respectively. The meta-analysis showed that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in everyday practice is comparable to that in clinical trials.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Adds Information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status in Elderly Cancer Patients: An Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 494-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazzaro Repetto ◽  
Lucia Fratino ◽  
Riccardo A. Audisio ◽  
Antonella Venturino ◽  
Walter Gianni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Geriatric Oncology ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Elderly Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: To appraise the performance of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly cancer patients (≥ 65 years) and to evaluate whether it could add further information with respect to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 363 elderly cancer patients (195 males, 168 females; median age, 72 years) with solid (n = 271) or hematologic (n = 92) tumors. In addition to PS, their physical function was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales. Comorbidities were categorized according to Satariano’s index. The association between PS, comorbidity, and the items of the CGA was assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: These 363 elderly cancer patients had a good functional and mental status: 74% had a good PS (ie, lower than 2), 86% were ADL-independent, and 52% were IADL-independent. Forty-one percent of patients had one or more comorbid conditions. Of the patients with a good PS, 13.0% had two or more comorbidities; 9.3% and 37.7% had ADL or IADL limitations, respectively. By multivariate analysis, elderly cancer patients who were ADL-dependent or IADL-dependent had a nearly two-fold higher probability of having an elevated Satariano’s index than independent patients. A strong association emerged between PS and CGA, with a nearly five-fold increased probability of having a poor PS (ie, ≥ 2) recorded in patients dependent for ADL or IADL. CONCLUSION: The CGA adds substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancer patients, including patients with a good PS. The role of PS as unique marker of functional status needs to be reappraised among elderly cancer patients.

Treatment patterns among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma following discontinuation of PD1/L1 inhibitor therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
Alicia K. Morgans ◽  
Simrun Kaur Grewal ◽  
Zsolt Hepp ◽  
Rupali Fuldeore ◽  
Shardul Odak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Treatment Patterns

414 Background: There are a lack of published real-world data on treatment patterns for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) previously treated with programmed death 1/ligand 1 inhibitor (PD-1/L1i) therapy. The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical characteristics and treatments among patients with la/mUC following discontinuation of first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) PD-1/L1i therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at 26 geographically diverse clinical sites in the US. Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma and radiographic evidence of metastatic or locally advanced disease were identified. Included patients had initiated and subsequently discontinued PD-1/L1i therapy in the 1L or 2L setting for la/mUC between May 15, 2016-July 31, 2018. All patients had follow-up through October 31, 2019. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Among the 300 patients included in the chart review, 198 (66%) received PD-1/L1i therapy as 1L and 102 (34%) as 2L therapy. Mean (SD) age at la/mUC diagnosis was 69.4 (8.7) years, and a majority of patients were male (66.0%) and White (74.7%). Consistent with age, most patients (82.7%) had comorbidities at la/mUC diagnosis; 39.7% hypertension, 23.7% coronary artery disease, 17.7% pulmonary disease, and 9.3% renal disease. At initiation of therapy, a higher proportion of patients who received 1L PD-1/L1i therapy had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or more than patients who received 2L PD-1/L1i therapy (36.8% vs 22.5%, respectively). Following discontinuation of PD-1/L1i therapy, 34% (n = 68) received subsequent therapy in 2L and 29% (n = 30) in third-line (3L). The most common subsequent therapies in 2L were gemcitabine monotherapy (24%), gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin (22%), PD-1/L1i therapy (22%), and taxane monotherapy (19%). The most common subsequent therapies received in 3L were taxane monotherapy (50%), pemetrexed (17%), and PD-1/L1i therapy (16%). Overall, switching from one PD-1/L1i therapy to another distinct PD-1/L1i therapy occurred in approximately 20% of patients, with “better efficacy/survival” noted by treatment teams as the most common reason for switching therapy among this subgroup. Conclusions: In this real-world case series, only a minority of patients with la/mUC who discontinued PD-1/L1i therapy received subsequent therapy. Among those that did, no clear standard of care was observed and approximately one-fifth of patients were treated with a second PD-1/L1i therapy after the first failed to control disease. Collectively, the data highlight significant unmet need for patients with la/mUC who discontinue PD-1/L1i therapy.

scholarly journals The real-world experience with nivolumab in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer from a cancer center in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waseem Abbas ◽  
Rudra Prasad Acharya ◽  
Archit Pandit ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Ranga Raju Rao
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Background: PDL-1 inhibitors have emerged as the new standard of care for second line treatment of NSCLC. Methods: Eligible patients included, histologically proven NSCLC, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0, 1 or 2, age 18 years and above, availability of pre-treatment tumor specimen, adequate end organ function, at least one prior platinum-based therapy. Patients who received a minimum of 6 doses of nivolumab were eligible. Results: Eleven previously treated patients with chemotherapy, started on nivolumab from April of 2016 to December of 2018, were retrospectively studied and analysed. The median age of patients was 58 years. Eight (72.73%) of the eleven patients were male. Seven (63.64%) of the patients were current or former smokers. Majority of patients had non-squamous histology; seven (63.64%) adenocarcinoma and four (36.36%) squamous cell carcinoma. 5 (45.46%) of the patients received one prior therapy, three (27.27%) received two prior therapies, and three (27.27%) received three prior therapies. Four (36.36%) of the patients had brain metastasis. Two (18.18%) of the patients were more than 70 years of age. Median number of cycles of nivolumab administered were 10 (range, 6 to 21). At the time of analysis, the median PFS was 8 months (95% CI, 1.52-14.47) and median OS was 15 months (95% CI, 6.9-23.09). Treatment was well tolerated and generally side effects were grade 1 and grade 2, except two patients who develop grade 3/4 pneumonitis. Conclusions: This is a real-world study of eleven previously treated patients with chemotherapy, started on Nivolumab from April of 2016 to December of 2018. Although, our sample size was small, our data supports the use of nivolumab as a new treatment option for patients of stage 4 NSCLC.

Real world eligibility of treatment-refractory stage IV colorectal cancer patients for palliative intent regorafenib monotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15007-e15007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arkhjamil Angeles ◽  
Wayne Hung ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Correct Trial ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Ecog Ps

e15007 Background: The CORRECT trial demonstrated overall survival benefits of regorafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who were refractory to prior chemotherapy and biological therapy. However, stringent criteria used to determine treatment eligibility in the trial setting may limit its external validity in the real world. We aimed to examine treatment attrition rates and eligibility of regorafenib in routine clinical practice. Methods: All patients diagnosed with metastatic CRC between 2009 and 2014 who received 2 or more lines of systemic therapy at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were identified. During the study timeframe, cetuximab (cmab) and panitumumab (pmab) were only used in the chemo-refractory setting. Data on clinical factors, pathological variables and outcomes were ascertained and analyzed. Eligibility was defined based on criteria outlined in the CORRECT trial. Results: A total of 391 patients were included among whom only 39% were considered eligible for regorafenib. Median age was 61 (range 22-84) years. 247 (63%) were men, 305 (78%) were Caucasian, and 237 (60%) had a colonic primary. The disease burden at diagnosis was high: 267 (81%) had lymph node involvement, and 225 (59%) had distant metastases. In patients previously treated with cmab, main reasons for regorafenib ineligiblity were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) > 1 (26.9%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (6.5%), and arterio-venous thrombotic or embolic events in the preceding 6 months (6.5%). In the group treated with pmab previously, main reasons for ineligibility were ECOG PS > 1 (46.6%), total bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN (14.1%), and thrombotic or embolic events in the past 6 months (5.7%). Additional analyses showed that regorafenib-eligible patients had increased median overall survival compared to ineligible patients (44.0 vs 37.1 months, P= 0.028). Conclusions: The strict trial eligibility criteria disqualified the majority of real world patients with metastatic CRC for regorfenib. As ineligibility predicts poorer outcomes, trials aimed at serving protocol-ineligible patients are warranted.

scholarly journals Safety, efficacy and patient-reported outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the PRECONNECT study

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e000698
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Bachet ◽  
Lucjan Wyrwicz ◽  
Timothy Price ◽  
Chiara Cremolini ◽  
Jean-Marc Phelip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundIn RECOURSE (, trifluridine/tipiracil significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PRECONNECT was designed to further characterise safety and clinical use of trifluridine/tipiracil.MethodsIn this ongoing, international, multicentre, open-label trial, patients with pretreated mCRC received oral trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included PFS and quality of life (QoL).Results793 patients (median age 62 years) from 13 countries received trifluridine/tipiracil for a median of 2.84 months (IQR 2.64). Adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 96.7%; the most common (≥20% of patients) were neutropaenia, asthenia/fatigue, nausea, anaemia and diarrhoea. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 73.9% of patients, with the most common being neutropaenia (39.1% of patients), anaemia (9.8%) and asthenia/fatigue (5.0%). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7 to 2.9). Median time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status deterioration (≥2) was 8.9 months (range 0.03–14.72). There was no clinically relevant change from baseline in QoL.ConclusionsPRECONNECT showed consistent results with the previously demonstrated safety and efficacy profile of trifluridine/tipiracil, with no new safety concerns identified. QoL was maintained during treatment.Trial registration numberNCT03306394.

The relationship between symptom burden and perceived comorbidity in outpatients with common solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6080-6080
Author(s):  
Christine Ritchie ◽  
Judith Manola ◽  
Elizabeth Kvale ◽  
Claire Frances Snyder ◽  
Michael Fisch
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Weighted Least Squares ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Comorbid Conditions ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Physical Scale ◽  
Patient Reported

6080 Background: Cancer patients have high symptom burden, but it is unclear whether comorbid conditions are associated with patient-reported symptom burden (the number and severity of symptoms). Methods: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) enrolled 3106 patients with invasive cancer of the breast, colon/rectum, prostate and lung, regardless of phase of care or stage of disease. At baseline, patients completed the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and were also asked how bothered they were by difficulties related to health problems other than cancer. Symptom burden (SB) was defined as the number of symptoms scored 7 or higher on the 13-item MDASI physical scale. Variance-weighted least squares regression was used to identify factors associated with increasing levels of being bothered by comorbid conditions. Results: About 65% of patients were at least a little bothered by symptoms associated with comorbidities. There was a strong association between increased bother by comorbidities and increased SB (p<0.0001). Among those not bothered by difficulties related to comorbidities, ≥1 symptom was rated 7 or worse by 29% of patients, compared to 51% in patients bothered by difficulties related to comorbidities (Fisher’s exact p<0.0001). Except for hair loss, the severity of all symptoms was higher in those patients reporting bother due to other perceived comorbidities. Factors associated with increased bother include SB (p<0.0001), taking medications for diabetes (p<0.0001), impaired ECOG performance status (p=0.03), older age (p=0.004), and being perceived by the clinician as having higher degree of difficulty for providing care (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Symptom burden varies significantly according to the degree to which cancer patients perceive bother that they attribute to comorbid health problems. Perception of comorbidity is worth exploring as a stratification factor in symptom research and as an indicator for complexity in patient care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document