scholarly journals Correction to: M1 macrophage dependent-p53 regulates the intracellular survival of mycobacteria

APOPTOSIS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Yun-Ji Lim ◽  
Junghwan Lee ◽  
Ji-Ae Choi ◽  
Soo-Na Cho ◽  
Sang-Hun Son ◽  
...  

The original version of this article unfortunately contains an error in the acknowledgement section. The text “Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Chungnam National University” was omitted by mistake. The correct and complete acknowledgment is given below: Acknowledgments This work was supported by the research fund of Chungnam National University and the Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Chungnam National University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author(s):  
Marisa Sklar ◽  
Joanna C. Moullin ◽  
Gregory A. Aarons

This chapter provides an introduction to study design, data collection, and analysis in implementation science. Although the randomized controlled trial is frequently employed in implementation science, a number of alternatives are relied on for addressing the unique challenges present. Alternatives include the cluster randomized control trial, roll-out designs such as the stepped wedge, cumulative trial, and effectiveness–implementation hybrid designs. Data collection and data analytic techniques must also address the unique challenges present in implementation science. Often, implementation occurs over time, often, across complex, multilevel contexts. Implementation scientists frequently utilize mixed, qualitative, and quantitative methodologies for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data. Data represent the outer context of service systems and the inner context of organizations such that the data are often nested and hierarchical in nature. This chapter highlights the previously mentioned topics, particularly as they relate to currently funded implementation studies focused on the cancer control continuum.


2020 ◽  
Vol 245 (13) ◽  
pp. 1155-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra H Blumenrath ◽  
Bo Y Lee ◽  
Lucie Low ◽  
Ranjini Prithviraj ◽  
Danilo Tagle

Technological advances with organs-on-chips and induced pluripotent stem cells promise to overcome hurdles associated with developing medical products, especially for rare diseases. Organs-on-chips—bioengineered “microphysiological systems” that mimic human tissue and organ functionality—may overcome clinical trial challenges with real-world patients by offering ways to conduct “clinical trials-on-chips” (CToCs) to inform the design and implementation of rare disease clinical studies in ways not possible with other culture systems. If applied properly, CToCs can substantially impact clinical trial design with regard to anticipated key outcomes, assessment of clinical benefit and risk, safety and tolerability profiles, population stratification, value and efficiency, and scalability. To discuss how tissue chips are best used to move the development of rare disease therapies forward, a working group of experts from industry, academia, and FDA as well as patient representatives addressed questions related to disease setting, test agents for microphysiological systems, study design and feasibility, data collection and use, the benefits and risks associated with this approach, and how to engage stakeholders. While rare diseases with no current therapies were considered the ultimate target, participants cautioned against stepping onto too many unknown territories when using rare disease as initial test beds. Among the disease categories considered ideal for initial CToC tests were well-defined diseases with known clinical outcomes; diseases where tissues on chips can serve as an alternative to risky first-in-human studies, such as in pediatric oncology; and diseases that lend itself to immuno-engineering or genome editing. Participants also considered important challenges, such as hosting the chip technology in-house, the high variability of cell batches and the resulting regulatory concerns, as well as the financial risk associated with the new technology. To make progress in this area and increase confidence with the use of tissue chips, the re-purposing of approved drugs ought to be the very first step. Impact statement Designing and conducting clinical trials are extremely difficult in rare diseases. Adapting tissue chips for rare disease therapy development is pivotal in assuring that treatments are available, especially for severe diseases that are difficult to treat. Thus far, the NCATS-led National Institutes of Health (NIH) Tissue Chip program has focused on deploying the technology towards in vitro tools for safety and efficacy assessments of therapeutics. However, exploring the feasibility and best possible approach to expanding this focus towards the development phase of therapeutics is critical to moving the field of CToCs forward and increasing confidence with the use of tissue chips. The working group of stakeholders and experts convened by NCATS and the Drug Information Association (DIA) addresses important questions related to disease setting, test agents, study design, data collection, benefit/risk, and stakeholder engagement—exploring both current and future best use cases and important prerequisites for progress in this area.


Author(s):  
Chris Wichman ◽  
Lynette M. Smith ◽  
Fang Yu

Abstract Introduction: Rigor and reproducibility are two important cornerstones of medical and scientific advancement. Clinical and translational research (CTR) contains four phases (T1–T4), involving the translation of basic research to humans, then to clinical settings, practice, and the population, with the ultimate goal of improving public health. Here we provide a framework for rigorous and reproducible CTR. Methods: In this paper we define CTR, provide general and phase-specific recommendations for improving quality and reproducibility of CTR with emphases on study design, data collection and management, analyses and reporting. We present and discuss aspects of rigor and reproducibility following published examples of CTR from the literature, including one example that shows the development path of different treatments that address anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: It is particularly important to consider robust and unbiased experimental design and methodology for analysis and interpretation for clinical translation studies to ensure reproducibility before taking the next translational step. There are both commonality and differences along the clinical translation research phases in terms of research focuses and considerations regarding study design, implementation, and data analysis approaches. Conclusions: Sound scientific practices, starting with rigorous study design, transparency, and team efforts can greatly enhance CTR. Investigators from multidisciplinary teams should work along the spectrum of CTR phases, and identify optimal practices for study design, data collection, data analysis, and results reporting to allow timely advances in the relevant field of research.


2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 463-466
Author(s):  
Heather S. Mallory ◽  
Martha R. Weiss

National science standards require an understanding of animal behavior, diversity, and adaptations of organisms, as well as the concept of science as inquiry. We have developed a hands-on classroom activity that addresses these standards through teaching about herbivory and diet breadth, using locally abundant caterpillars and plants. This activity provides students with opportunities for careful observation, data collection and analysis, and development of testable hypotheses for further experimentation. The lesson can be adapted to different grade levels, with students taking on varied levels of responsibility for formulation of hypotheses, experimental design, data collection, and data analysis.


This chapter discusses the big five qualitative traditions/designs and others. It is divided into seven sections, and the first section discusses biography design. The types and steps of undertaking projects via biography design are highlighted in detail. The second and third sections address phenomenology and grounded theory designs respectively. The case study design is exposed in Section 4 while historical design is explored in Section 5. Section 6 contains information related to ethnography design. The readers will be able to understand the data collection and analysis procedures related to each and every design and the unique characteristics of the designs are exposed in this chapter. The chapter is concluded by a question and answer section, where important questions are suggested and answered.


1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S186-S193 ◽  
Author(s):  
ELIZABETH DRAPER ◽  
DOUGLAS WAGNER ◽  
MARIANNE RUSSO ◽  
MARILYN BERGNER ◽  
STEPHEN SHORTELL ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document