Determination of Body Fat Distribution by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Attenuation of Visceral Fat Vasoconstriction by Enalapril

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1084-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix W. Leung ◽  
Samuel Murray ◽  
Elsa Murray ◽  
Vay Liang Go
2016 ◽  
Vol 248 ◽  
pp. 190-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se-Jun Park ◽  
Hyoung-Mo Yang ◽  
Kyoung-Woo Seo ◽  
So-Yeon Choi ◽  
Byoung-Joo Choi ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
M. Hara ◽  
T. Saikawa ◽  
H. Niwa ◽  
M. Kurokawa ◽  
A. Yoshimura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Silvia G.R. Neri ◽  
Juscelia Cristina Pereira ◽  
Ana Cristina de David ◽  
Ricardo M. Lima

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of body fat distribution on postural balance and lower-limb muscle quality in women aged 60 years and over. Two hundred and twenty-two volunteers took part in this cross-sectional analysis. Participants underwent body fat distribution assessment using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and were classified as nonobese, gynoid obese, or android obese. Postural balance was assessed during quiet standing, with and without vision restriction, using a force platform. Specific torque was defined as the ratio of knee extensors peak torque (evaluated by an isokinetic dynamometer) to the lean mass of the same limb (evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Compared with nonobese participants, both obese groups exhibited higher range of postural sway along the anteroposterior and mediolateral axes (P < .05). However, there were no differences between participants with gynoid and android obesity. The android obese group exhibited greater speed of postural sway in the condition without vision restriction than both nonobese (P = .040) and gynoid obese (P = .004) groups. Regarding muscle quality, only participants with gynoid obesity (P = .004) presented lower specific torque than their nonobese peers. These results may be clinically useful when designing falls prevention exercises targeting the obese population.


1992 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Itabashi ◽  
S. Saneshige ◽  
A. Takeuchi ◽  
H. Kashiwabara ◽  
J. Ishii

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Srdic ◽  
Edita Stokic ◽  
Agneza Polzovic ◽  
Sinisa Babovic

Introduction. The presence of excess fat in the abdomen, out of proportion to total body fat, is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and other complications of obesity. Histoanatomical characteristics of the abdominal adipose tissue In regard to subcutaneous fat, accumulation of visceral abdominal adipose tissue is more associated with increased metabolic risk. However, mean have more visceral fat than pre-menopausal women. Compared with pre-menopausal women, postmenopausal women have 49% more intraabdominal fat, regardless of age and total fat mass. Measurement of abdominal fat depots Various anthropometric indicators have been suggested for measuring body fat distribution. All of them have advantages and disadvantages, in relation to their interpretation and use. Many are specified as ratios and are difficult to interpret biologically, whereas a change in body fat distribution may exhibit little or no change in the ratios. Waist circumference and sagittal abdominal diameter are good predictors of visceral fat. But, extreme individual variations in visceral to subcutaneous ratio demonstrate the limitations of external anthropometry. The best methods to estimate the amount of visceral fat are imaging techniques like computed tomography or magnetic resonance, but they are expensive and inconvinient in routine practice. Conclusion. Further investigations should provide a simple and optimal indicator of abdominal obesity which should correlate with the amount of viscelar fat and the risk. .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document