Winter wheat root distribution with irrigation, planting methods, and nitrogen application

2021 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-245
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Mehrabi ◽  
Ali Reza Sepaskhah ◽  
Seyed Hamid Ahmadi
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Buczek ◽  
Barbara Kryńska ◽  
Renata Tobiasz-Salach

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 1658-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-hua LÜ ◽  
Ji-qing SONG ◽  
Wen-bo BAI ◽  
Yong-feng WU ◽  
Yuan LIU ◽  
...  

Weed Science ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Devlin ◽  
David R. Gealy ◽  
Larry A. Morrow

Foliar and root absorption and translocation of metribuzin (4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one) by downy brome (Bromus tectorumL. # BROTE) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) was determined. After a 48-h absorption period, roots of three-week-old downy brome plants had absorbed two times more metribuzin on a total plant fresh weight basis than had roots of winter wheat. Root-absorbed metribuzin was translocated similarly regardless of species with 80% of absorbed14C accumulating in leaf blades, 10% in the leaf sheaths, and 10% in the roots. After 24 h, leaves of downy brome and winter wheat had absorbed, respectively, 26 and 36% of foliar-applied metribuzin, and absorption increased threefold with the addition of a nonionic surfactant. Translocation of foliar-absorbed metribuzin was primarily towards the apex of the treated leaf. No translocation from the treated leaf to other plant parts occurred with either species. The greater tolerance of winter wheat to metribuzin is due in part to less root absorption of metribuzin by winter wheat than by downy brome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document