Association Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Pediatric Readmissions

Author(s):  
Carrie L. Nacht ◽  
Michelle M. Kelly ◽  
M. Bruce Edmonson ◽  
Daniel J. Sklansky ◽  
Kristin A. Shadman ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-111
Author(s):  
Cecilia Martinez-Torteya ◽  
Alyssa Donovan ◽  
Michelle A. Gilchrist ◽  
Heather Marshall ◽  
Alissa C. Huth-Bocks

2021 ◽  
pp. 001112872199933
Author(s):  
Kendra Thompson-Dyck

Leveraging point-level spatial data from the Phoenix area, we consider the role of nearby organizations as contextual factors that amplify or reduce reoffending risk among juvenile offenders after court completion. Using survival models, we examine whether residential proximity to seven types of organizations impacts risk of recidivism, net of neighborhood disadvantage and offender characteristics. Aggregate neighborhood disadvantage was not associated with reoffending risk and organizational findings were mixed. Low-level offenders with more total organizations nearby had a higher risk of new property offenses, while the risk of drug and violent reoffending nearly doubled for diversion youth residing near police facilities or detention centers. Individual demographics and prior offense histories remained the strongest, most consistent predictors of juvenile recidivism.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria E. Bleil ◽  
Bradley M. Appelhans ◽  
Alexis S. Thomas ◽  
Steven E. Gregorich ◽  
Neal Marquez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a crisis unprecedented in its size and scope. Yet studies of resilience suggest most individuals will successfully negotiate this challenge and some may even experience growth and positive change. Some evidence suggests that the capacity to enact positive change in the face of adversity may be shaped by early life experiences. Methods In a subset of 374 participants (57% female, mean age = 29 years) in the Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (SECCYD), a longitudinal, birth cohort, prospective models were tested to determine whether early life adversities in family and neighborhood contexts predict positive change events in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Childhood family and neighborhood contexts were assessed using a combination of self-report questionnaires and US Census data. Adulthood positive change events (e.g., becoming more appreciative of things usually taken for granted) were assessed using the Epidemic-Pandemic Impacts Inventory (EPII). Results In regression analyses, neighborhood disadvantage in childhood, measured both by objective and subjective assessments, predicted a higher number of positive change events in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (β = .18, p = .004 and β = .15, p = .006, respectively). Examination of the positive change event subscales showed neighborhood disadvantage in childhood predicted increases in events related to ‘perspective taking and charitable giving’ (β = .20, p = .022 and β = .17, p = .002, respectively) and improved ‘social relationships’ (β = .18, p = .004 and β = .13, p = .020, respectively), but not to positive ‘health behaviors’ (ps > .05). All associations were independent of sociodemographic factors and childhood family dysfunction. Conclusions Findings suggest that neighborhood disadvantage in childhood may shape prosocial responses to stress in adulthood, potentially through early life adaptions to stress that are protective when facing adversity. There are several notable implications of the study findings. Although adversity in early life has clear negative impacts, it is possible that adversity experiences may also provide opportunities to develop adaptive strategies that foster resilience and growth when facing stress. Intervention efforts should consider leveraging such stress-adapted strengths to reduce the many negative impacts of early life adversity.


Author(s):  
Juliette Deschamps ◽  
Mohamed Boucekine ◽  
Laurence Fayol ◽  
Jean Christophe Dubus ◽  
Steve Nauleau ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Boardman ◽  
Brian Karl Finch ◽  
Christopher G. Ellison ◽  
David R. Williams ◽  
James S. Jackson

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace M. Barnes ◽  
John W. Welte ◽  
Marie-Cecile O. Tidwell ◽  
Joseph H. Hoffman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document