Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Valid for Measuring Student Learning Outcomes in Business Related Classes? A Neural Network and Bayesian Analyses

2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S. Galbraith ◽  
Gregory B. Merrill ◽  
Doug M. Kline
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching Effectiveness ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Evaluations ◽  
Student Evaluations Of Teaching ◽  
Bayesian Analyses

scholarly journals Konsep Dasar Belajar di SDIT Cendikia

AS-SABIQUN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nurhaeniah Nurhaeniah ◽  
Nurul Maspupah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Evaluations ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Learning Activities

The purpose of this study is to find out the meaning of learrning, this study uses a qualitative approach, tjhen the instruments used are observation and documention of learning activities in class.the results of the analysis of student learning are obtained i the cognitive shutter which is the value of student evaluations when working on evaluation questions given by the teacher when the learning process takes place. The results of this study can be used SDIT CENDIKIA to find out learning styles of student learning outcomes and can be used for consideration of schools and parents of students, especially those in grades V and VI.

Metacognitive Strategies and Student Evaluations in a STEM Field

2018 ◽  
pp. 357-373
Author(s):  
Gina J. Mariano ◽  
Fred J. Figliano ◽  
Chelsea A. Dempsey ◽  
Reeves Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Evaluations ◽  
Metacognitive Skills ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Improve Student Learning

This chapter reviews metacognition in relation to college settings while focusing on ways to use this information to help improve student learning outcomes. Metacognition in relation to critical thinking and student evaluations of their own learning is discussed, specifically focusing on the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) area of mathematics. Next, we will elaborate on a pilot study that focuses on asking students metacognitive questions to gain a better understanding of their metacognitive skills in relation to basic statistics courses. This chapter concludes with a discussion of how incorporating metacognitive and critical thinking strategies can impact student learning.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR IPS SISWA KELAS VII MTS.S ASH-SHIDDIQ TIKEP

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashar Ashar ◽  
Mursidin T Mursidin T
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Teaching Effectiveness ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Student Activities ◽  
Average Value

ABSTRAK: Tujuan utama dalam penelitian adalah 1) untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar siswa pada penerapan model Numbered Head Together dalam pembelajaran IPS Siswa Kelas VII MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep, 2) untuk meningkatkan keefektifan mengajar guru pada penerapan model Numbered Head Together dalam pembelajaran IPS Siswa Kelas VII MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep, 3) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan model Numbered Head Together pada pembelajaran IPS Siswa Kelas VII MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada tanggal 22 Maret sampai dengan tanggal 26 April 2018 yang dilihat sebanyak dua siklus dan setiap siklus terdiri dari dua kali pertemuan yang dilaksanakan pada semester genap tahun ajaran 2017/2018 pada siswa kelas VII MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep. Prosedur penelitian ini meliputi: perencanaan, pelaksanaan tindakan, observasi dan evaluasi serta refleksi. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah data kualitatif dan data kuantitatif. Data kualitatif diambil dengan menggunakan lembar observasi, sedangkan data kuantitatif diperoleh melalui tes siklus. Berdasarkan analisis data menunjukan bahwa: 1) aktivitas siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran Numbered Head Togeteher pada skor rata-rata aktivitas siswa siklus I sebesar 2,8 yang termasuk pada kategori cukup meningkat pada siklus II menjadi 3,6 yang termasuk padakategori baik; 2) keefektifan mengajar guru ditunjukkan dengan skor rata-rata padasiklus I adalah 2,9 yang termasuk kategori baik dan meningkat lebih efektif lagi pada siklus II menjadi 3,7 yang berkategori baik mengarah ke sangat baik; 3). Terjadi peningkatan hasil belajar siswapada siklus I dari 26 orang siswa hanya 15 orang siswa yang tuntas dengan presentase ketuntasan 62,32% dengan nilai rata-rata 63,86. Pada siklus II mengalami peningkatan yaitu dari 26 orang siswa ada 23 orang siswa yang tuntas dengan presentase ketuntasan 90% dengan nilai rata-rata 85,62. Kata Kunci: Model, NHT, Hasil Belajar ABSTRACT: The main objective in this research is 1) to increase student learning activities on the application of the Numbered Head Together model in Social Studies learning for Class VII MTs.S students Ash-Shiddiq Tikep, 2) to improve the effectiveness of teaching teachers in the application of the Numbered Head Together model in Social Studies learning Students of Class VII MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep, 3) to improve student learning outcomes through the application of the Numbered Head Together model in social studies learning of Class VII Students of MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep. This type of research is Classroom Action Research. This research was conducted on March 22 until April 26, 2018 which was seen as many as two cycles and each cycle consisted of two meetings conducted in the even semester of the academic year 2017/2018 for students of class VII MTs.S Ash-Shiddiq Tikep. The procedures of this research include: planning, implementing actions, observing and evaluating as well as reflecting. The data in this study are qualitative data and quantitative data. Qualitative data were collected using observation sheets, while quantitative data were obtained through cycle tests. Based on data analysis shows that: 1) student activities with the application of the Numbered Head Togeteher learning model on the average score of cycle I students activities of 2.8 which included in the category quite increased in cycle II to 3.6 which included in both categories; 2) the teaching effectiveness of teachers is shown by the average score on the first cycle is 2.9 which belongs to the good category and increases even more effectively in the second cycle to 3.7 which categorizes good leads to very good; 3). An increase in student learning outcomes in the first cycle of 26 students only 15 students who completed with a percentage of completeness 62.32% with an average value of 63.86. In the second cycle, there was an increase, from 26 students there were 23 students who were completed with 90% completeness with an average value of 85.62. Keywords: Model, NHT, Learning Outcomes

Metacognitive Strategies and Student Evaluations in a STEM Field

2021 ◽  
pp. 954-970
Author(s):  
Gina J. Mariano ◽  
Fred J. Figliano ◽  
Chelsea A. Dempsey ◽  
Reeves Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Evaluations ◽  
Metacognitive Skills ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Improve Student Learning

This chapter reviews metacognition in relation to college settings while focusing on ways to use this information to help improve student learning outcomes. Metacognition in relation to critical thinking and student evaluations of their own learning is discussed, specifically focusing on the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) area of mathematics. Next, we will elaborate on a pilot study that focuses on asking students metacognitive questions to gain a better understanding of their metacognitive skills in relation to basic statistics courses. This chapter concludes with a discussion of how incorporating metacognitive and critical thinking strategies can impact student learning.

scholarly journals Interaction with a machine teacher improves student learning outcomes and teaching effectiveness. Results with Wiley Daila from Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Pelzer
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Effectiveness ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Teaching And Learning Environment ◽  
Learning Machine ◽  
Technological Competency

With the increase in demand for online learning, machine teachers are becoming an important technology in higher education since they are expected to improve teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. However, machine teachers require an aptitude for technology and are associated with high initial costs. Thus, here we use a more basal form of a machine teacher that enhances the interaction but does not require advanced technological competency. In a survey study from two universities in Indonesia, we investigate how the machine teacher Wiley Daila affects the teaching and learning environment. The findings indicate that Daila is perceived as useful and increases perceived teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The study also shows that more research is needed to better understand the nuances in interaction.

The Effect of Jigsaw Methode and Motivation on Students’ of Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Yunita Yunita ◽  
Hidayat Hidayat ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to: (1) investigate the effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning on students learning outcomes; (2) find the difference in learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation and (3) find the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes. The population of the study is students of grade IVa, IVb, IVc at SD Kasih Ibu Patumbak and the sample in this study is grade IVa with 35 students and grade IVb with 35 students. The results show that: (1) the average student learning outcomes of jigsaw cooperative learning is 28.40 while conventional is 24.14. Thus, students learning outcomes that get cooperative learning of jigsaw type are higher than conventional learning, (2) Students who have high motivation get an average value = 30.74, while low motivation is 22.72. Thus, it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes having high learning motivation and low learning motivation, and (3) students learning outcomes  taught by jigsaw cooperative learning are high learning motivation groups (32.94), and low learning motivation groups (24.58), while students taught with conventional learning are high learning motivation groups (28.40 ), and low motivation groups (20,95). Thus, there is no interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document