scholarly journals Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh Amin ◽  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Oluwaseyi Dina ◽  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Anagha Nadkarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Similar Risk

AbstractAtrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban–warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran–warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban–warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59–0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60–0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71–0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76–0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99–1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin.

Abstract 14354: Persistence to Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the United States

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Manuela Di Fusco ◽  
Cynthia Gutierrez ◽  
Mauricio Ferri ◽  
Cristina Russ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Time Varying Covariates

Background: Studies have shown that nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who discontinue direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at higher risk of complications, such as stroke. This analysis compared the risk of non-persistence of OACs among NVAF patients. Methods: Adult NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were identified using 01JAN2013-31MAR2019 data from the IQVIA commercial claims database. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuation (no evidence of index OAC use for 60 days from the last days’ of supply) or switch to another OAC. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were generated to illustrate time-to-non-persistence along with cumulative incidences of non-persistence. Adjusted cox proportional hazards models, including time-varying covariates (e.g., major bleeding, stroke), were used to evaluate non-persistence risk. Results: A total of 32,103 apixaban, 5,906 dabigatran, 29,385 rivaroxaban, and 21,420 warfarin patients were included; mean age: 63. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence compared to dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.56), rivaroxaban (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81), and warfarin (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.65-0.68). Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence compared to warfarin (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.19-1.28) and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.42-1.52), and rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk compared to warfarin (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.82-0.86). KM curves and cumulative incidences are presented below (Figure). Conclusions: In this group of NVAF patients, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of non-persistence compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence compared to warfarin and dabigatran. Such differences are critical as persistence with OACs is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications.

Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Comparison to Phenprocoumon in Geriatric and Non-Geriatric Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 119 (06) ◽  
pp. 971-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Hohmann ◽  
Stefan H. Hohnloser ◽  
Josephine Jacob ◽  
Jochen Walker ◽  
Stephan Baldus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
P Values ◽  
Interaction Terms ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models

AbstractGeriatric characteristics such as high age, multi-morbidity, polypharmacy and frailty are common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In a retrospective study using a German claims database, effectiveness (ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism) and safety (intracerebral, gastrointestinal and major extracranial bleeding) were compared in patients with non-valvular AF starting non-vitamin K oral antagonists (NOACs) (apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) and phenprocoumon. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios, and interaction terms of the treatment group and geriatric status (defined by age ≥75 years, frailty, ≥ 4 co-morbidities and polypharmacy) were entered into the model. A total of 42,562 and 27,939 patients initiated NOAC and phenprocoumon treatment (mean age 74 years ± 11, 51% male) with a follow-up time of 147,785 person-years. Note that 52.9% of patients were elderly, 50.8% were frail, 37.0% were co-morbid and 46.5% had polypharmacy. NOAC use was not associated with effectiveness and gastrointestinal bleeding, neither in geriatric nor in non-geriatric patients. The hazard of major extracranial and intracranial bleeding was significantly decreased for NOAC use, with similar risk reduction in geriatric and non-geriatric patients: major extracranial bleeding 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56–0.87) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60–0.89) for the geriatric groups and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.56–0.93) to 0.76 (0.59–0.98) for the non-geriatric groups (p-values for interaction > 0.6); and intracranial bleeding 0.52 (95% CI, 0.39–0.69) to 0.59 (95% CI, 0.47–0.73) for the geriatric groups and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.37–0.79) to 0.65 (95% CI, 0.49–0.86) for the non-geriatric groups (p-values for interaction > 0.2). Hence, NOACs showed similar effectiveness and superior safety in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.

P2529Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Dominguez Rodriguez ◽  
S Raposeiras Roubin ◽  
D Alonso Rodriguez ◽  
S J Camacho Freire ◽  
E Abuassi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Similar Risk

Abstract Introduction Embolic prevention with oral anticoagulation is the cornerstone for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data about the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in nonagenarian patients are limited. We aimed to analyze the impact of oral anticoagulation in mortality, embolic and hemorrhagic events, in patients ≥90 years with non-valvular AF. Methods We used data from a multicentric registry of 1,750 consecutive nonagenarian patients diagnosed of AF between 2013 and 2018. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to match the baseline characteristics of patients treated or not with oral anticoagulants, and for those treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) vs direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The impact of oral anticoagulation in the embolic and hemorrhagic risk was assessed by a competitive risk analysis, using a Fine and Gray regression model, with death being the competitive event. For embolic risk, we have considered a stroke, pulmonary or peripheral embolism. For bleeding risk, we have considered any bleeding requiring hospital admission. Results The mean of CHA2DS2-VASC and HASBLED scores was 4.5±1.3 and 2.8±1.0 points, respectively. Most of patients were anticoagulated (70.1%; n=1,256). DOACs were used in 709 patients, and VKAs in 517 patients. During a median follow-up of 25.2 months (IQR 12.2–44.3 months), 988 patients died (56.5%), 180 presented embolic events (10.3%), 186 had bleeding events (10.6%), and 29 had intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, 1.7%). After propensity-score matching, anticoagulation (versus non anticoagulation) was associated with lower mortality rate (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60–0.89; p=0.002), less mortality and embolic events (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.92; p=0.005), but more bleeding events (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.25–3.35; p=0.004). In comparison with VKAs, DOACs showed similar risk of mortality and embolic events (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.88–1.47; p=0.337), and similar risk of bleeding events (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43–1.28; p=0.287), although a trend to lower risk of ICH was found (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.02–1.39; p=0.097). Conclusions Among nonagenarian patients with AF, oral anticoagulation was associated with lower all-cause mortality. Although survival free of embolic events was significantly higher in patients with anticoagulation, the risk of major bleeding was twice than in non-anticoagulated patients. There was not differences between VKAs and DOACs in terms of embolic events and total major bleeding. However, compared with VKAs, DOACs were showed a trend to lower risk of ICH.

Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Recent Stroke Who Are Dependent on the Daily Help of Others

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa Meya ◽  
Alexandros A. Polymeris ◽  
Sabine Schaedelin ◽  
Fabian Schaub ◽  
Valerian L. Altersberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
The Individual

Background and Purpose: Data on the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with stroke attributable to atrial fibrillation (AF) who were dependent on the daily help of others at hospital discharge are scarce. Methods: Based on prospectively obtained data from the observational Novel-Oral-Anticoagulants-in-Ischemic-Stroke-Patients-longterm registry from Basel, Switzerland, we compared the occurrence of the primary outcome—the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death—among consecutive patients with AF-stroke treated with either VKAs or DOACs between patients dependent (defined as modified Rankin Scale score, 3–5) and patients independent at discharge. We used simple, adjusted, and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression to account for potential confounders. Results: We analyzed 801 patients (median age 80 years, 46% female), of whom 391 (49%) were dependent at discharge and 680 (85%) received DOACs. Over a total follow-up of 1216 patient-years, DOAC- compared to VKA-treated patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42–0.81]), as did independent compared to dependent patients (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40–0.71]). There was no evidence that the effect of anticoagulant type (DOAC versus VKA) on the hazard for the composite outcome differed between dependent (HR dependent , 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45–1.01]) and independent patients (HR independent , 0.44 [95% CI, 0.26–0.75]) in the simple model ( P interaction =0.212). Adjusted (HR dependent , 0.74 [95% CI, 0.49–1.11] and HR independent , 0.51 [95% CI, 0.30–0.87]; P interaction =0.284) and weighted models (HR dependent , 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48–1.31] and HR independent , 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26–0.81]; P interaction =0.163) yielded concordant results. Secondary analyses focusing on the individual components of the composite outcome were consistent to the primary analyses. Conclusions: The benefits of DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation with a recent stroke were maintained among patients who were dependent on the help of others at discharge. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03826927.

scholarly journals Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (11) ◽  
pp. 975-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Shital Kamble ◽  
Xianying Pan ◽  
Jack Mardekian ◽  
Ruslan Horblyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Significant Difference

SummaryIn addition to warfarin, there are four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) available for stroke prevention in non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There are limited data on the comparative risks of major bleeding among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients who initiate warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban, when used in ‘real world’ clinical practice. The study used the Truven MarketScan® Commercial & Medicare supplemental US claims database. NVAF patients aged ≥18 years newly prescribed an oral anticoagulant 01JAN2013–31DEC2014, with a ≥1-year baseline period, were included (study period: 01JAN2012–31DEC2014). Major bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring hospitalisation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance age, sex, region, baseline comorbidities, and comedications. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the PSM hazard ratio (HR) of major bleeding. Among 45,361 newly anticoagulated NVAF patients, 15,461 (34.1 %) initiated warfarin, 7,438 (16.4 %) initiated apixaban, 17,801 (39.2 %) initiated rivaroxaban, and 4,661 (10.3 %) initiated dabigatran. Compared to matched warfarin initiators, apixaban (HR: 0.53; 95 % CI: 0.39–0.71) and dabigatran (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.50–0.96) initiators had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. Patients initiating rivaroxaban (HR: 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.83–1.17) had a non-significant difference in major bleeding risk compared to matched warfarin patients. When comparisons were made between NOACs, matched rivaroxaban patients had a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (HR: 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.36–2.43) compared to apixaban patients. The differences for apixaban-dabigatran and dabigatran-rivaroxaban matched cohorts were not statistically significant. Among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients in the real-world setting, apixaban and dabigatran initiation was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin initiation. When compared to apixaban, rivaroxaban initiation was associated with significantly higher risk of major bleeding.Note: The review process for this paper was fully handled by Christian Weber, Editor in Chief.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury with Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Adults with Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
pp. CJN.05920421
Author(s):  
Ziv Harel ◽  
Eric McArthur ◽  
Nivethika Jeyakumar ◽  
Manish Sood ◽  
Amit Garg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Propensity Scores ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards

Background: Anticoagulation with either with a vitamin K antagonist or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) may be associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Our objective was to assess the risk of AKI among elderly individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) newly prescribed a DOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) versus warfarin. Methods: A population-based cohort study of 20,683 outpatients in Ontario, Canada, ≥66 years, with atrial fibrillation who were prescribed warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban between 2009- 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on derived propensity scores for the treatment with each DOAC was used to balance baseline characteristics among patients receiving each of the three DOACs, compared to warfarin. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in the weighted population to compare the association between the prescribed anticoagulant and the outcomes of interest. The exposure was an outpatient prescription of warfarin, or one of the DOACs. The primary outcome was a hospital encounter with AKI, defined using KDIGO thresholds. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) category, and by the percentage of international normalized ratio measurements in range, a validated marker of anticoagulation control. Results: : Each DOAC was associated with a significantly lower risk of AKI compared to warfarin (weighted HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.80 for dabigatran, weighted HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98 for rivaroxaban; and weighted HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93 for apixaban). In subgroup analysis, the lower risk of AKI associated with each DOAC was consistent across each eGFR strata. The risk of AKI was significantly lower among users of each of the DOACs compared to warfarin users who had a percentage of international normalized ratio measurements ≤56.1%. Conclusions: DOACs were associated with a lower risk of AKI compared to warfarin.

The Association between Oral Anticoagulants and Cancer Incidence among Individuals with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 1384-1394
Author(s):  
Devin Abrahami ◽  
Christel Renoux ◽  
Hui Yin ◽  
Jean-Pascal Fournier ◽  
Laurent Azoulay
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract Objective Existing evidence on the association between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and cancer is limited and contradictory. No observational studies have been conducted to simultaneously address the cancer safety of VKAs and DOACs. The objective of this study was to determine whether use of VKAs and DOACs, separately, when compared with nonuse, is associated with cancer overall and prespecified site-specific incidence. Methods Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified patients newly diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) between 2011 and 2017. Using a time-varying exposure definition, each person-day of follow-up was classified as use of (1) VKAs, (2) DOACs, (3) VKAs and DOACs (drug switchers), and (4) nonuse of anticoagulants (reference). We also conducted a head-to-head comparison of new users of DOACs versus VKAs using propensity score fine stratification weighting. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer overall and prespecified subtypes were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Compared with nonuse, use of VKAs was not associated with cancer overall (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.91–1.22) or cancer subtypes. Similarly, use of DOACs was not associated with cancer overall (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93–1.37), but an association was observed for colorectal cancer (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.01–2.99), and pancreatic cancer generated an elevated, though nonsignificant HR (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 0.72–6.44). Results were consistent in the head-to-head comparison. Conclusion Use of oral anticoagulants is not associated with the incidence of cancer overall among patients with NVAF. Possible associations between DOACs and colorectal and pancreatic cancer warrant further study.

Abstract 17609: Comparison of All-cause and Bleeding-related Hospitalizations Among Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulants

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Deitelzweig ◽  
Amanda Bruno ◽  
Kiran Gupta ◽  
Jeffrey Trocio ◽  
Natalie Tate
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Prescription Date

To compare the risk of hospitalization among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients newly initiated with an oral anticoagulant (OAC): apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. Retrospective cohort study using Humana Medicare Advantage data from 7/1/2009 - 9/30/2014. NVAF patients ≥18 years receiving one OAC on the index date with 6 months continuous enrollment prior to index prescription date and 3 months post-index were eligible. Hospitalizations were identified by standard codes for inpatient admission. Bleeding-related hospitalizations required an additional code for major/clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. A cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of hospitalizations adjusted for age, sex, region, comorbidities and comedications. Adherence for each OAC was also calculated using a proportion of days covered approach to understand medication taking behaviors. Among the 53,168 patients initiated on an OAC, 2,028 (3.8%) apixaban, 5,644 (10.6%) dabigatran, 7,667 (14.4%) rivaroxaban and 37,829 (71.1%) warfarin. Patients in apixaban cohort were older (mean 75.5 years, P <0.05) with higher mean CHA 2 DS 2- VASc score (P <0.05). Abixaban patients had a higher mean HAS-BLED score vs. dabigatran (P <0.0001), lower mean score vs. warfarin (P <0.0001) and did not differ significantly vs. rivaroxaban (P =0.46). Patients receiving apixaban had a significantly lower risk for all-cause hospitalization across cohorts, and a sig. lower risk for bleeding-related hospitalization vs. patients receiving rivaroxaban or warfarin (Table). Adherence ranged from 87.8% to 90.4% across cohorts. In a real-world setting, initiation with apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk for all-cause hospitalization, and a significantly lower risk of bleeding-related hospitalization compared to rivaroxaban or warfarin. Table: Adjusted Hazard Ratios of All-cause and Bleeding-related Hospitalizations

scholarly journals Risks and Benefits of Direct Oral Anticoagulants across the Spectrum of GFR among Incident and Prevalent Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1144-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Im Shin ◽  
Alex Secora ◽  
G. Caleb Alexander ◽  
Lesley A. Inker ◽  
Josef Coresh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Background and objectivesAll randomized trials of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation excluded patients with severe kidney disease. The safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants across the range of eGFR in real-world settings is unknown. Our objective is to quantify the risk of bleeding and benefit of ischemic stroke prevention for direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without CKD.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe created a propensity score–matched cohort of 3206 patients with atrial fibrillation and direct oral anticoagulant use and 3206 patients with atrial fibrillation using warfarin from October of 2010 to February of 2017 in an electronic health record (Geisinger Health System). The risks of bleeding and ischemic stroke were compared between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users using Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by eGFR (≥60 and <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2).ResultsThe mean (SD) age of the 6412 participants was 72 (12) years, 47% were women, and average eGFR was 69 (21) ml/min per 1.73 m2. There were 1181 bleeding events and 466 ischemic strokes over 7391 person-years of follow-up. Compared with warfarin use, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulant use were 1.01 (0.88 to 1.17) and 1.23 (1.02 to 1.48) for those with eGFR≥60 and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively (P-interaction=0.10). There was no difference between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users in the risk of ischemic stroke: HRs (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.74 to 1.18) and 1.02 (0.76 to 1.37) for those with eGFR≥60 and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively (P-interaction=0.70). Similar findings were observed with individual drugs.ConclusionsIn a large health care system, patients with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 who took direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation had slightly higher risk of bleeding compared with those on warfarin, but similar benefits from prevention of ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals The “Obesity Paradox” in Patients With HFpEF With or Without Comorbid Atrial Fibrillation

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linjuan Guo ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
Peng Yu ◽  
Wengen Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Obesity Paradox ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Background: Overweight and mildly obese individuals have a lower risk of death than their normal-weight counterparts; this phenomenon is termed “obesity paradox.” Whether this “obesity paradox” exists in patients with heart failure (HF) or can be modified by comorbidities is still controversial. Our current study aimed to determine the association of body mass index (BMI) with outcomes with patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods: Patients with HFpEF from the Americas in the TOPCAT trial were categorized into the 3 groups: normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30 kg/m2). The Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and CIs.Results: We identified 1,749 patients with HFpEF, 42.1% of which had baseline AF. In the total population of HFpEF, both overweight (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42–0.83) and obesity (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35–0.69) were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death. Among patients with HFpEF without AF, overweight (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27–0.95) and obesity (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.98) were associated with a lower risk of all-cause death. In those with AF, obesity (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40–0.95) but not overweight (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.54–1.21) was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause death.Conclusions: The “obesity paradox” assessed by BMI exists in patients with HFpEF regardless of comorbid AF.Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00094302.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document