The Dynamic Control Bound of Flood Limited Water Level Considering Capacity Compensation Regulation and Flood Spatial Pattern Uncertainty

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao-feng Tan ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Pan Liu ◽  
Xiao-hui Lei ◽  
Si-yu Cai ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 01055
Author(s):  
Xin Wu ◽  
Ping Zhong

This paper briefly introduces the method, content and approval process of the dynamic control of the flood limited level in Wuqiangxi reservoir, and summarizes the benefits since the implementation of dynamic control. The relevant research results of this paper can be used as reference for production technology management personnel.


2013 ◽  
Vol 830 ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Jian Tang ◽  
Liang Ren ◽  
Hui Xu ◽  
Bo Hu ◽  
Zhan Feng Ding ◽  
...  

The contradiction between water shortage and social needs has become an important factor restricting economic development. As freshwater, flood could be used as the natural resources to resolve the problem of water shortage, and also has some environmental benefits. Taking Danjiangkou reservoir as example, we adopt dynamic control method of limited water level to discuss the potential socioeconomic benefits of flood utilization.


2013 ◽  
Vol 726-731 ◽  
pp. 3359-3363
Author(s):  
Mi Zhou ◽  
Ya Li Wang ◽  
Yan Sheng Feng ◽  
Qing Qing Zhang

t is important to reasonably raise the reservoir flood limited water level in order to increase the utilization of the rainwater resources. The methods to set the flood limited water level include the static control and the dynamic control. And the dynamic control methods include the multiple duration method and the dynamic control method. All those methods were summarized and analyzed in this paper, especially the dynamic control. The advantages of the multiple duration method and the dynamic control method for the flood were indicated respectively. Those two methods were contrastively analyzed from the design principles, the application conditions, the actual operation complexity and the risk control factors. Then the conclusion was obtained, that the dynamic control method will be more advantageous and popular than the multiple duration the in the future.


Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanjun Liu ◽  
Hui Qin ◽  
Qin Shen ◽  
Rui Tian ◽  
Yongqi Liu

Reservoirs play a significant role in water resources management and water resource allocation. Traditional flood limited water level (FLWL) of reservoirs is set as a fixed value which over-considers the reservoir flood control and limits the benefits of reservoirs to a certain extent. However, the dynamic control of the reservoir FLWL is an effective solution. It is a method to temporarily increase the water level of the reservoir during the flood season by using forecast information and discharge capacity, and it can both consider flood control and power generation during the flood season. Therefore, this paper focuses on multi-objective optimal scheduling of dynamic control of FLWL for cascade reservoirs based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to get the trade-off between flood control and power generation. A multi-objective optimal scheduling model of dynamic control of FLWL for cascade reservoirs which contains a new dynamic control method is developed, and the proposed model consists of an initialization module, a dynamic control programming module and an optimal scheduling module. In order to verify the effectiveness of the model, a cascade reservoir consisting of seven reservoirs in the Hanjiang Basin of China were selected as a case study. Twenty-four-hour runoff data series for three typical hydrological years were used in this model. At the same time, two extreme schemes were chosen for comparison from optimized scheduling schemes. The comparison result showed that the power generation can be increased by 9.17 × 108 kW·h (6.39%) at most, compared to the original design scheduling scheme, while the extreme risk rate also increased from 0.1% to 0.268%. In summary, experimental results show that the multi-objective optimal scheduling model established in this study can provide decision makers with a set of alternative feasible optimized scheduling schemes by considering the two objectives of maximizing power generation and minimizing extreme risk rate.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanlai Zhou ◽  
Shenglian Guo ◽  
Jijun Xu ◽  
Xiaofeng Zhao ◽  
Lini Zhai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document