The risk of post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis treated with the direct oral anticoagulants

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Prandoni ◽  
◽  
Walter Ageno ◽  
Maurizio Ciammaichella ◽  
Nicola Mumoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Predictors of long-term post-thrombotic syndrome following high proximal deep vein thrombosis: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Engeseth ◽  
Tone Enden ◽  
Per Morten Sandset ◽  
Hilde Skuterud Wik
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a frequent chronic complication of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb, but predictors of PTS are not well established. We aimed to examine predictors of PTS in patients with long-term PTS following proximal DVT. Methods During 2006–09, 209 patients with a first time acute upper femoral or iliofemoral DVT were randomized to receive either additional catheter-directed thrombolysis or conventional therapy alone. In 2017, the 170 still-living participants were invited to participate in a cross-sectional follow-up study. In the absence of a gold standard diagnostic test, PTS was defined in line with clinical practice by four mandatory, predefined clinical criteria: 1. An objectively verified DVT; 2. Chronic complaints (> 1 month) in the DVT leg; 3. Complaints appeared after the DVT; and 4. An alternative diagnosis was unlikely. Possible predictors of PTS were identified with multivariate logistic regression. Results Eighty-eight patients (52%) were included 8–10 years following the index DVT, and 44 patients (50%) were diagnosed with PTS by the predefined clinical criteria. Younger age and higher baseline Villalta score were found to be independent predictors of PTS, i.e., OR 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–0.99), and 1.23 (95% CI, 1.02–1.49), respectively. Lack of iliofemoral patency at six months follow-up was significant in the bivariate analysis, but did not prove to be significant after the multivariate adjustments. Conclusions In long-term follow up after high proximal DVT, younger age and higher Villalta score at DVT diagnosis were independent predictors of PTS.

Risk Factors for Post-Thrombotic Syndrome in Patients With a First Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Angiology ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 000331972110708
Author(s):  
Luca Spiezia ◽  
Elena Campello ◽  
Chiara Simion ◽  
Anna Poretto ◽  
Fabio Dalla Valle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Minimum Period ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Deep Vein

The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a matter of debate. Hence, our endeavor to investigate a large cohort of patients with a first episode of proximal DVT treated with DOACs to ascertain the incidence and predisposing risk factors for PTS. All consecutive patients referred to the Thrombotic and Haemorrhagic Diseases Unit of Padova University Hospital (Italy) between January 2014 and January 2018 for a first episode of proximal DVT were considered for enrollment. Participants received DOACs for a minimum period of 3 months. PTS was assessed using the Villalta score up to 36 months after DVT diagnosis. Among 769 enrolled patients (M/F 353/416, age range 26–87 years), 152 (19.8%) developed PTS and 30 (3.9%) developed severe PTS. The adjusted hazard ratio was significant for obesity (1.64, 95% CI 1.28–2.39) and DVT site (femoral and/or iliac veins vs popliteal vein) (1.23, 95% CI 1.15–3.00). The incidence of PTS is not negligible in patients with proximal DVT despite the use of DOACs. We identified obesity and iliofemoral DVT as possible risk factors for PTS. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and optimize therapeutic strategies.

scholarly journals Variability in the management of line-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Cires-Drouet ◽  
Jashank Sharma ◽  
Tara McDonald ◽  
John D Sorkin ◽  
Brajesh K Lal
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Medical Specialists ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Question Survey

Objectives Central-venous devices are risk-factors for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. We surveyed physicians to identify practice-patterns and adherence to American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Methods The 13-question survey obtained physician-demographics and treatment-choices. Respondents were grouped into surgical and medical specialists. Data were reported as ratios and percentages, and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results We received 143 responses from physicians; 65% treated one-to-two new cases/month. Most physicians (69.2%) used anticoagulation; 36.4% retained the catheter and 32.9% removed it. Medical-specialists retained catheters more often than surgeons ( p = 0.027). For recurrences, 84% repeated anticoagulation; 50.3% retained the catheter. A majority anticoagulated upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis in long-term catheters for three months only (55.1%). Direct oral anticoagulants were used frequently (43.6%). Only 10% believed that existing guidelines were appropriate and only 2.8% followed all guidelines. Conclusion There is great variability in treatment-decisions for upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis. The existing guidelines are considered inadequate and not followed by most physicians.

Upper extremities deep vein thrombosis and DOAC treatment: a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C Vedovati ◽  
G Tratar ◽  
A Mavri ◽  
L Pierpaoli ◽  
G Agnelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Central Venous Line ◽  
Upper Extremities ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with upper extremities deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) are limited. Purpose To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in the treatment of UEDVT. Methods Data on patients with an objective diagnosis of acute UEDVT treated with DOACs were merged from prospective cohorts of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Study outcomes were recurrent VTE and major bleeding (MB) occurring during DOAC treatment. Results Overall, 132 patients were included: mean age was 47.7±18.0 years (range 18 to 97), males were 42.4%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had 2 or more risk factors for VTE, 29.5% had UEDVT complicating a central venous line or after pacemaker implantation (Table). Ninety-two patients (70%) were managed as outpatients. Increased age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.0–1.05) and anemia (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.70) were associated with in-patient management. Among patients treated with apixaban (40) or rivaroxaban (85) loading dose was used in 72%; in patients treated with dabigatran (5) or edoxaban (2) mean heparin pre-treatment was 8 days. DOACs were started after 1 month from UEDVT diagnosis in 12.9% of patients; active cancer was a main predictor for delayed initiation (OR 22.2, 95% CI 5.8–84.4). Mean treatment duration in patients with a scheduled stop was 4.9 months, while mean followup in those who continued DOACs was 9.3 months. No recurrence of VTE nor MBs occurred during DOAC treatment; one patient had acute limb ischemia (1.38% patient-year), 7 clinically relevant non-MBs (3 genital, 2 epistaxis, 1 gingival, 1 genital bleeding plus epistaxis; 10.51% patient-year), 5 deaths (4 cancer, 1 advanced age; 9.69% patient-year). Conclusions Our data support the effectiveness and safety of DOACs for the treatment of acute UEDVT. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with upper extremity deep vein thrombosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Sánchez Montiel ◽  
Raein Ghazvinian ◽  
Anders Gottsäter ◽  
Johan Elf
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Prevention of the post thrombotic syndrome with anticoagulation: a narrative review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilia Makedonov ◽  
Susan R Kahn ◽  
Jameel Abdulrehman ◽  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Aurélien Delluc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Compression Stockings ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Preventative Measures ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Deep Vein

The post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is chronic venous insufficiency secondary to a prior deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It is the most common complication of VTE and, while not fatal, it can lead to chronic, unremitting symptoms as well as societal and economic consequences. The cornerstone of PTS treatment lies in its prevention after DVT. Specific PTS preventative measures include the use of elastic compression stockings (ECS) and pharmacomechanical catheter directed thrombolysis (PCDT). However, the efficacy of these treatments has been questioned by large RCTs. So far, anticoagulation, primarily prescribed to prevent DVT extension and recurrence, appears to be the only unquestionably effective treatment for the prevention of PTS. In this literature review we present pathophysiological, biological, radiological and clinical data supporting the efficacy of anticoagulants to prevent PTS and the possible differential efficacy among available classes of anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists (VKA), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)). Data suggest that LMWHs and DOACs are superior to VKAs, but no head-to-head comparison is available between DOACs and LMWHs. Owing to their potentially greater anti-inflammatory properties, LMWHs could be superior to DOACs. This finding may be of interest particularly in patients with extensive DVT at high risk of moderate to severe PTS, but needs to be confirmed by a dedicated RCT.

scholarly journals Association between Sarcopenia/Lower Muscle Mass and Short-Term Regression of Deep Vein Thrombosis Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-794
Author(s):  
Yuta Torii ◽  
Kenya Kusunose ◽  
Robert Zheng ◽  
Hirotsugu Yamada ◽  
Rie Amano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Concomitant Use of Diosmin/Hesperidin and Oral Rivaroxaban Increases Deep Vein Recanalization and Reduces the Incidence of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome in Patients with Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 986-986
Author(s):  
Kirill Lobastov ◽  
Iliya Schastlivtsev ◽  
Victor Barinov
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
And Control ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aim: To assess the impact of long-term Diosmin/Hesperidin use in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: This study was a pilot randomized open-label study with blinded outcome assessor - enrolled patients with their first episodes of popliteal-femoral DVT confirmed by duplex ultrasound (DUS). All participants were randomized into two groups: 1.) control that received a standard treatment with oral Rivaroxaban, and 2.) experimental that required additional treatment with Diosmin/Hesperidin 450/50 mg twice a day. Both drugs were used for six months. Patients were followed-up for the whole treatment period with series DUS every two months in order to evaluate the degree of recanalization by popliteal (PV), superficial femoral (SFV), and common femoral (CFV) veins' compressibility. Thrombi extension was assessed by modified Marder score. At the end of the follow-up period, patients were assessed with Villalta and venous clinical severity scores. Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) was diagnosed in those who had ≥5 Villalta score. Results: Sixty patients were randomized to the control and experimental groups (n=30 in each group). There were 40 men and 20 women with mean age of 56.3±13.4. Clinically unprovoked DVT was recognized in 65% of cases and left side localization in 45%. The median of Marder baseline scores were 15.0±4.8 and 11.1±4.3 in the experimental and control groups, respectively (p=0.002). After six months of treatment, the Marder score decreased to 0.8±1.6 and 2.8±3.5 in the main control groups, respectively (p=0.006). The generalized linear model repeated measures found a greater reduction in the Marder score (р <0.0001) and increased speed of recanalization on SFV (р <0.0001) with a non-significant tendency in the CFV (p=0.130) and PV (p=0.204) in the experimental group compared to the control one. Full recanalization of the PV at six months was observed in 24 patients (80%), who had received Diosmin/Hesperidin, and only in 17 persons (57%) of the control group (p=0.047). The median of Villalta score in the group treated with Diosmin/Hesperidin was significantly lower compared to the control one (2.9±2.7 versus 5.8±3.0 [p <0.0001]). The same difference was found for VCSS score (2.3±1.9 versus 4.9±1.9 [p <0001]). According to the Villalta score, PTS was recognized in six patients (20%) and 17 patients (57%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (p=0.004). Conclusion: Long-term treatment with Diosmin/Hesperidin can increase the speed of deep vein recanalization and reduce the incidence of PTS diagnosed at six months in patients with proximal DVT treated with oral rivaroxaban. Disclosures Lobastov: Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schastlivtsev:Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Barinov:Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Treatment Failure of Venous Stenting With or Without Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) / Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Term of the Stent Patency: Protocol for a Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahram Mohebbi ◽  
Jamal Moosavi ◽  
Behshid Ghadrdoost ◽  
Ayatollah Bayatian ◽  
Hooman Bakhshandeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Patency Rate ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Venous Stenting ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background: Venous stenting plays a significant role in the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). But the adjuvant anti-coagulant therapy could also help to more successful patency rate. We hope to elucidate the differences in the patency rate of venous stenting with or without direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) / non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods: Studies that work on the stent patency rate in venous stent with or without DOAC / NOAC will be included. The primary studies (Cohort, case control, case-series or randomized/ non-randomized trials) will be included if the participants / patients have had acute or chronic DVT, with venous stenting (at least one study group or all of study subjects) who have received DOAC / NOAC agents. The stent patency rate should be reported in all of study subjects within a follow-up time, minimum for 1 year. We will perform an electronic search on published or in press articles, which have been published in MEDLINE / PubMed, Embase, the online Cochrane database, CENTRAL and searches of clinical trial registries: clinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials, ISRCTN registry, WHO network registry for trials. PROSPERO databases will be manually searched for protocols.After screening of the relevant articles, selection and data extraction will be conducted in duplicate and independently. Methodological quality of the selected studies will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool. We will use “Hazard Ratio” (HR) as the optimum Effect Size (ES) in this meta-analysis, otherwise we will use or calculate “Risk Ratio” (RR) or “Odds Ratio” (OR) ES measures as the selected study specific ES. Discussion: In this review, we hope to find the treatment failure/ success rate of venous stenting with or without DOAC / NOAC regards to the stent patency rate and will try to provide insights into the right choice of anti-coagulant therapy.Submitted to PROSPERO (20/9/2021): CRD42021274542

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document