Rapid and simple method for DNA extraction from plant and algal species suitable for PCR amplification using a chelating resin Chelex 100

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwon HwangBo ◽  
Su Hyun Son ◽  
Jong Suk Lee ◽  
Sung Ran Min ◽  
Suk Min Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Algal Species ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Chelating Resin ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Chelex 100

Simple Method for DNA Extraction from Pancreatic Juice for PCR Amplification Assays

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Müller ◽  
Ralf Jesnowski ◽  
Stefan Liebe ◽  
Arndt Rolfs ◽  
Matthias Löhr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Pancreatic Juice ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Simple Method

scholarly journals A SIMPLE METHOD OF DNA EXTRACTION OF MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS FROM SPUTUM CULTURES FOR SEQUENCING ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2s) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Maharani Pertiwi Koentjoro ◽  
Adyan Donastin ◽  
Endry Nugroho Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Sequencing Analysis ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Molecular Tests ◽  
Mycobacterial Genome ◽  
Complex Procedure ◽  
Species Specific

Background: Concern has been raised about DNA extraction from Mycobacterium tuberculosis due to its complex procedure. This study demonstrates a simple and fast DNA extraction method of mycobacterial genome to subsequent molecular investigation, such as Polymerization Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification, with species-specific primers and sequencing. Materials and Methods: Total DNA was isolated from M. tuberculosis cultured by using boil method. DNA was evaluated via measures of DNA quantity and quality (absorbance at 230, 260 and 280 nm), DNA integrity (electrophoresis). Molecular tests were tested namely PCR and sequencing. Conclusions: The quality of DNA obtained is acceptable for PCR and sequencing analysis. These findings demonstrate that the method used is inexpensive and suitable for minimum infrastructure facilities.

Development of rapid and simple method for DNA extraction from cannabis resin based on the evaluation of relative PCR amplification ability

2018 ◽  
Vol 287 ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadashi Yamamuro ◽  
Yuko T. Iwata ◽  
Hiroki Segawa ◽  
Kenji Kuwayama ◽  
Kenji Tsujikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Simple Method

OPTIMIZATION OF DNA EXTRACTION METHODS FROM BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS OF HONEY BEES IN A DIFFERENT METAMOTPHOSIS PHASE

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
M. Palkina ◽  
O. Metlitska
Keyword(s):  
Ion Exchange ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Biological Material ◽  
Exchange Resin ◽  
Ion Exchange Resin ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Chelex 100 ◽  
Drone Brood ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

The aim of the research – adaptation, optimization and using of existing DNA extraction methods from bees’ biological material with the reagent «Chelex-100" under complex economic conditions of native laboratories, which will optimize labour costs and improve the economic performance of DNA extraction protocol. Materials and methods. In order to conduct the research the samples of honey bees’ biological material: queen pupae exuviae, larvae of drone brood, some adult bees’ bodies (head and thorax) were selected. Bowl and drone brood were obtained from the experimental bee hives of Institute of Apiculture nd. a. P. I. Prokopovich of NAAS. DNA extraction from biosamples of Apis mellifera ssp. was carried out using «Chelex-100®» ion exchange resin in different concentrations and combinations. Before setting tests for determination of quantitative and quality indexes, dilution of DNA samples of the probed object was conducted in ratio 1:40. The degree of contamination with protein and polysaccharide fractions (OD 260/230), quantitative content of DNA (OD 260/280) in the extracted tests were conducted using spectrophotometer of «Biospec – nano» at the terms of sample volume in 2 µl and length of optical way in 0,7 mm [7]. Verification of DNA samples from biological material of bees, isolated by «Chelex-100®», was conducted after cold keeping during 24 hours at 20°C using PСR with primaries to the fragment of gene of quantitative trait locus (QTL) Sting-2 of next structure [8]:  3' – CTC GAC GAG ACG ACC AAC TTG – 5’; 3' – AAC CAG AGT ATC GCG AGT GTT AC – 5’ Program of amplification: 94 °C – 5 minutes – 1 cycle; 94 °C – 1 minute, 57°C – 1 minute, 72 °C – 2 minutes – 30 cycles; elongation after 72°C during 2 minutes – 1 cycle. The division of obtained amplicons was conducted by gel electrophoresis at a low current – 7 µÀ, in 1,5 % agarose gel (Sigma ®) in TAE buffer [7]. The results. At the time of optimization of DNA isolation methods, according to existing methods of foreign experts, it was found optimal volume of ion exchange resin solution was in the proposed concentration: instead of 60 µl of solution used 120 µl of «Chelex-100®», time of incubation was also amended from 30 minutes to 180 minutes [9]. The use of the author's combination of method «Chelex-100®» with lysis enzymes, proteinase K and detergents (1M dithiothreitol), as time of incubation was also amended, which was reduced to 180 minutes instead of the proposed 12 hours [10]. Changes in quality characteristics of obtained DNA in samples after reduction in incubation time were not found. Conclusions. The most economical method of DNA isolation from bees’ biological material is 20% solution of «Chelex-100» ion exchange resin with the duration of the incubation period of 180 minutes. It should also be noted that the best results can be obtained from exuviae, selected immediately after the queen’s exit from bowl, that reduces the likelihood of DNA molecules destruction under the influence of nucleases activation, but not later than 12 hours from release using the technology of isolated obtain of queens.

scholarly journals A Rapid Bacteriophage DNA Extraction Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Džiuginta Jakočiūnė ◽  
Arshnee Moodley
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Illumina Miseq ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Phage Dna ◽  
Specialized Equipment ◽  
Miseq Platform ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Bacteriophages (phages) are intensely investigated as non-antibiotic alternatives to circumvent antibiotic resistance development as well as last resort therapeutic options against antibiotic resistant bacteria. As part of gaining a better understanding of phages and to determine if phages harbor putative virulence factors, whole genome sequencing is used, for which good quality phage DNA is needed. Traditional phage DNA extraction methods are tedious and time consuming, requiring specialized equipment e.g., an ultra-centrifuge. Here, we describe a quick and simple method (under four hours) to extract DNA from double stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages at titers above 1.0 × 1010 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL. This DNA was suitable for library preparation using the Nextera XT kit and sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform.

scholarly journals Assessing Quality and Functionality of DNA from Fresh and Archival Dried Blood Spots and Recommendations for Quality Control Guidelines

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 1401-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malin Ida Linnea Sjöholm ◽  
Joakim Dillner ◽  
Joyce Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Multiple Displacement Amplification ◽  
Dried Blood Spots ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Alkaline Lysis ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Blood Spots ◽  
Dna Yield ◽  
Chelex 100

Abstract Background: Dried blood spots (DBS) are a convenient and inexpensive method for biobanking. Although many countries have established population-based DBS biobanks from neonatal screening programs, the quality and usefulness of DNA from DBS have not been extensively assessed. Methods: We compared 4 common DNA extraction methods (Qiagen, EZNA, Chelex 100, and alkaline lysis) in a pilot study using fresh DBS with known lymphocyte count. We assessed suitability for multiple displacement amplification (MDA) and subsequent single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses. We selected the EZNA method for DNA extraction from archival samples up to 27 years old, stored at room temperature or −20 °C, and SNP analyses were performed after MDA. Results: Extraction using alkaline lysis failed in most tests, and Chelex 100 was unsuccessful in real-time PCR, whereas the EZNA and Qiagen methods were successful by all evaluated quality indices. DNA extraction by EZNA, MDA, and SNP analyses were successful for the archival samples stored at −20 °C. Conclusion: Routine protocols for evaluation of the quality and functional integrity of DNA based on DNA yield, DNA size, and quantification of amplifiable DNA allow use of sufficient template for MDA and successful SNP analyses from both primary DBS extract and MDA product. A single 3-mm disc can yield sufficient DNA for several thousand SNP analyses. DNA from DBS is thus suitable for genetic epidemiology studies.

Determination of Silver Speciation in Natural Waters. 1. Laboratory Tests of Chelex-100 Chelating Resin as a Competing Ligand

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1953-1958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell T. Herrin ◽  
Anders W. Andren ◽  
David E. Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Natural Waters ◽  
Chelating Resin ◽  
Chelex 100

scholarly journals The Nature of the Muscle-Relaxing Factor

1963 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 893-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin Fuchs ◽  
F. Norman Briggs
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Gel Filtration ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Calcium Deficiency ◽  
Chelating Resin ◽  
Prolonged Heating ◽  
Relaxing Factor ◽  
Chelex 100 ◽  
High Molecular Weight Material

High speed centrifugal fractionation of homogenates of rabbit skeletal muscle has led to the discovery of a soluble muscle-relaxing factor in the homogenate. Assay of the relaxing activity with deoxycholate-treated myofibrils and reconstituted actomyosin systems has established that the activity is not produced by the presence of contaminants. Relaxing activity could be removed or destroyed by charcoal, dialysis, prolonged heating, and treatment with the chelating resin, chelex-100, making it improbable that the effect is due simply to calcium deficiency. Many of the characteristics of this muscle-relaxing factor suggest that it is very similar to or the same as the factor formed by the incubation of muscle granule fractions and ATP. Evidence is presented that some soluble protein component is involved in the stabilization of the factor. The relaxing activity could be separated from the high molecular weight material in the supernatant by the technique of gel filtration. On the basis of the gel used, the molecular weight of the active agent should be less than 4000.

scholarly journals Method Comparison of DNA Isolation and Quantification for Fish and Seafood Authenticity Determination

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Dwiyitno Dwiyitno ◽  
Stefan Hoffman ◽  
Koen Parmentier ◽  
Chris Van Keer
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Dna Isolation ◽  
Blue Mussel ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Amplification Efficiency ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Seafood Products ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Commercial Kit

Fish and seafood products has been commonly targeted for fraudulent activities. For that reason, authentication of fish and seafood products is important to protect consumers from fraudulent and adulteration practices, as well as to implement traceability regulation. From the viewpoint of food safety, authenticity is beneficial to protect public from serious food poisoning incidents, such as due to ingestion of toxic species. Since DNA based identification depends on the nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the quantity and quality/purity of DNA will contribute significantly to the species authentication. In the present study, different DNA extraction and purification methods (3 classical methods and one commercial kit) were compared to produce the better isolated DNA for PCR amplification. Additionally, different methods for the estimation of DNA concentration and purity which is essential for PCR amplification efficiency were also evaluated. The result showed that classical DNA extraction methods (based on TNES-Urea) yielded a higher amount of DNA (11.30-323.60 ng/g tissue) in comparison to commercial kit/Wizard Promega (5.70-83.45 ng/g tissue). Based on the purity of DNA extract (A260/280), classical DNA extraction method produced relatively similar on DNA quality to the commercial kit (1.79-2.12). Interestingly, all classical methods produced DNA with A260/280 ratio of more than 2.00 on the blue mussel, in contrast with commercial kit. The commercial kit also produced better quality of DNA compared to the classical methods, showing the higher efficiency in PCR amplification. NanoDrop is promising as cheap, robust and safe UV-spectrophotometer method for DNA quantification, as well as the purity evaluation.Keywords: seafood authenticity, DNA isolation, polymerase chain reaction, NanoDrop, Picogreen

scholarly journals The Fellowship of the Ring Test: DNAqua-Net WG2 initiative to compare diatom metabarcoding protocols used in routine freshwater biomonitoring for standardisation

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Vasselon ◽  
Éva Ács ◽  
Salomé Almeida ◽  
Karl Andree ◽  
Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Aquatic Ecosystems ◽  
Quality Index ◽  
Ecological Status ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Ring Test ◽  
Dna Metabarcoding ◽  
Ecological Status Assessment ◽  
Status Assessment

During the past decade genetic approaches have been developed to monitor biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems. These enable access to taxonomic and genetic information from biological communities using DNA from environmental samples (e.g. water, biofilm, soil) and methods based on high-throughput sequencing technologies, such as DNA metabarcoding. Within the context of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), such approaches could be applied to assess Biological Quality Elements (BQE). These are used as indicators of the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems as part of national monitoring programs of the european network of 110,000 surface water monitoring sites with 79.5% rivers and 11% lake sites (Charles et al. 2020). A high-throughput method has the potential to increase our spatio-temporal monitoring capacity and to accelerate the transfer of information to water managers with the aim to increase protection of aquatic ecosystems. Good progress has been made with developing DNA metabarcoding approaches for benthic diatom assemblages. Technological innovation and protocol optimization have allowed robust taxonomic (species) and genetic (OTU, ESV) information to be obtained from which diatom quality indices can be calculated to infer ecological status to rivers and lakes. Diatom DNA metabarcoding has been successfully applied for biomonitoring at the scale of national river monitoring networks in several countries around the world and can now be considered technically ready for routine application (e.g. Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil et al. 2017, Bailet et al. 2019, Mortágua et al. 2019, Vasselon et al. 2019, Kelly et al. 2020, Pérez-Burillo et al. 2020, Pissaridou et al. 2021). However, protocols and methods used by each laboratory still vary between and within countries, limiting their operational transferability and the ability to compare results. Thus, routine use of DNA metabarcoding for diatom biomonitoring requires standardization of all steps of the metabarcoding procedure, from the sampling to the final ecological status assessment in order to define good practices and standards. Following previous initiatives which resulted in a CEN technical report for biofilm sampling and preservation (CEN 2018), a set of experiments was initiated during the DNAqua-Net WG2 diatom workshop (Cyprus, 2019) to focus on DNA extraction and PCR amplification steps in order to evaluate: i) the transferability and reproducibility of a protocol between different laboratories; ii) the variability introduced by different protocols currently applied by the scientific community. 19 participants from 14 countries performed DNA extraction and PCR amplification in parallel, using i) the same fixed protocol and ii) their own protocol. Experiments were performed by each participant on a set of standardized DNA and biofilm samples (river, lake, mock community). In order to specifically test the variability of DNA extraction and PCR amplification steps, all other steps of the metabarcoding process were fixed and the preparation of the Miseq sequencing was performed by only one laboratory. The variability within and between participants will be evaluated on DNA extracts quantity, taxonomic (genus, species) and genetic richness, community structure comparison and diatom quality index scores (IPS). We will also evaluate the variability introduced by different DNA extraction and PCR amplification protocols on diatom quality index scores and the final ecological status assessment. The results from this collaborative work will not serve to define “one protocol to rule them all”, but will provide valuable information to define guidelines and minimum requirements that should be considered when performing diatom metabarcoding for biomonitoring.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document