Assessment of the effectiveness of group education on knowledge for women with newly diagnosed gestational diabetes

2017 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Alayoub ◽  
S. Curran ◽  
M. Coffey ◽  
M. Hatunic ◽  
M. Higgins
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
AmbikaGopalakrishnan Unnikrishnan ◽  
MonieRiju Simon ◽  
Nikita Sarkar ◽  
Suganthi Kumaran ◽  
Anil Chittake ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 754-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilgay Izci Balserak ◽  
Grace W. Pien ◽  
Bharati Prasad ◽  
Dimitrios Mastrogiannis ◽  
Chang Park ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caro Minschart ◽  
Kelly Amuli ◽  
Anouk Delameillieure ◽  
Peggy Calewaert ◽  
Chantal Mathieu ◽  
...  

The value of diabetes education, focusing on lifestyle measures, in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is acknowledged, but requires intensive education and input of resources if done on an individual basis. Group education could be a valuable alternative to individual education. This study aims to investigate the impact of multidisciplinary group education on women’s knowledge about GDM, education, treatment satisfaction, and emotional status. Two hundred women with GDM were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Dutch speaking women were offered group education at their first visit after GDM diagnosis. Non-Dutch speaking women or women for whom group education was not possible received individual education. Individual follow-up with a dietitian was planned within two weeks for all women. Women receiving individual education (n = 100) were more often from an ethnic minority background compared to women in group education (n = 100) (32.0% (n = 31) vs. 15.3% (n = 15), p = 0.01). Knowledge about GDM significantly improved after education, with few differences between the two education settings. Both patients in group and individual education were equally satisfied with the content and duration of the initial and follow-up education. Of all group participants, 91.8% (n = 90) were satisfied with group size (on average three participants) and 76.5% (n = 75) found that group education fulfilled their expectations. In conclusion, women diagnosed with GDM were overall satisfied with the education session’s content leading to a better understanding of their condition, independent of the education setting. Group education is a valuable alternative to better manage the increasing workload and is perceived as an added value by GDM patients.


Rheumatology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i112-i113
Author(s):  
Maureen Cox ◽  
Joanna C. Robson ◽  
Ishita Patel ◽  
Jessica Wilson ◽  
Jackie Sherwood ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002277
Author(s):  
Deborah A Randall ◽  
Jonathan M Morris ◽  
Patrick Kelly ◽  
Sarah J Glastras

IntroductionThe incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing in Australia, influenced by changed diagnostic criteria. We aimed to identify whether the diagnostic change was associated with improved outcomes and/or increased obstetric interventions using state-wide data in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.Research design and methodsPerinatal and hospital data were linked for singleton births, 33–41 weeks’ gestation, 2006–2015, NSW. An adjusted Poisson model was used to split pregnancies from 2011 onwards into those that would have been diagnosed under the old criteria (‘previous GDM’) and newly diagnosed cases (‘additional GDM’). We compared actual rates of total and early (<39 weeks) planned births, cesareans, and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes for GDM-diagnosed pregnancies using three predicted scenarios, where the ‘additional GDM’ group was assumed to have the same rates as: the ‘previous GDM’ group <2011 (scenario A); the ‘non-GDM’ group <2011 (scenario B); or the ‘non-GDM’ group ≥2011 (scenario C).ResultsGDM incidence more than doubled over the study period, with an inflection point observed at 2011. For those diagnosed with GDM since 2011, the actual incidence of interventions (planned births and cesareans) and macrosomia was consistent with scenario A, which meant higher intervention rates, but lower rates of macrosomia, than those with no GDM. Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia was lower than scenario A and closer to the other scenarios. There was a reduction in perinatal deaths among those with GDM, lower than that predicted by all scenarios, indicating an improvement for all with GDM, not only women newly diagnosed. Incidence of maternal and neonatal morbidity indicators was within the confidence bounds for all three predicted scenarios.ConclusionsOur study suggests that the widely adopted new diagnostic criteria for GDM are associated with increased obstetric intervention rates and lower rates of macrosomic babies, but with no clear impacts on maternal or neonatal morbidity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Saira Tasneem ◽  
Sanum Kashif

Objective: To determine the frequency of newly diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and common associated factors in recurrent GDM. Study Design: Cross sectional. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology unit A of Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from 27th July 2016 to 27th Jan 2017. Materials and Methods: 336 women meeting the eligibility criteria (18-45 years, of any gestational age with gestational diabetes mellitus history and diagnosed as recurrent gestational diabetes) were included in the study. All patients who were labeled as a case of recurrent gestational diabetes was further investigated for any risk factor associated with its recurrence. Results: The recurrence of Gestational Diabetes was observed in 99 (29.46%) patients, in which 77% of patients had family history positive. Conclusion: Keeping in view the recurrence of gestational diabetes proper screening and medical care for GDM in women during the childbearing years is highly recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document