scholarly journals PrEP Product Acceptability and Dual Process Decision-Making Among Men Who Have Sex with Men

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
José A. Bauermeister ◽  
Julie S. Downs ◽  
Douglas S. Krakower
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 733-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichole M. Scaglione ◽  
Brittney A. Hultgren ◽  
Racheal Reavy ◽  
Kimberly A. Mallett ◽  
Rob Turrisi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-595
Author(s):  
Trias Bratakusuma

Nowadays, although the pageraji village government has implemented e-government but more to increase services through the elimination of the old and complicated bureaukasi structure. In this case more information systems are used to speed up and automate processes. There is no information system yet focused on supporting the decision process. Pakkades.id is a type of information system intended to facilitate budgeting mechanisms. In the process of drafting village development budgets, community participation or aspirations are urgently needed. However, there are often obstacles to getting aspirations from the community because the mechanism that is implemented now only through deliberations implemented one day, this will narrow the reach. Therefore, with the implementation of Pakkades.id which is the result of the study authors of the Funding Ristek Dikti 2019 is expected to efficiency and effectively process decision making through the process of capturing the aspirations of the community better.  


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Pat Croskerry

Medical error is one of the leading causes of death, and most of these errors appear to occur in the ways that practitioners’ thoughts and feelings impact their decision making. Major gains have been made in the cognitive sciences in the past few decades that have provided a model for understanding how decisions are made—dual process theory. It is an excellent platform on which to examine the different ways decisions are made. Importantly, it allows for the examination of the pervasive influence of cognitive and affective biases on clinical decision making. Current medical training appears to fall short of what is needed to produce rational decision makers, due to what has been referred to as a mindware gap. Practitioners need to move from routine expertise to a higher level of expertise that will close this gap. A clear difficulty lies in finding ways of understanding and teaching the clinical decision-making process that do not violate the ecological characteristics of real-time clinical practice. By preserving as much as possible the rich clinical detail that makes up clinical medicine, this book attempts to offer important insights into the process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-600
Author(s):  
Gary Gregory ◽  
Liem Ngo ◽  
Ryan Miller

Purpose The purpose of this study develops and validates a model of new donor decision-making in the charity sector. Drawing upon dual process theory, the model incorporates brand salience and brand attitude as antecedents of brand choice intention, moderated by donor decision involvement. Design/methodology/approach Study 1 generates measures using interviews with marketing, media and research managers, and new donors from two international aid and relief organizations. Study 2 uses an experimental design to first test scenarios of disaster relief, and then validate and confirm a new donor decision model using large-scale consumer panels for the international aid and relief sector in Australia. Findings The results replicated across four leading international aid-related charities reveal that brand salience is positively related to brand choice intention through the mediating effect of brand attitude. Furthermore, the effect of brand salience on brand choice intention is significantly stronger when donor decision involvement is low. Conversely, the effect of brand attitude on brand choice intention is stronger for higher levels of donor decision involvement. Practical implications Managers should understand the importance of brand salience/attitudes and the implications for the communication strategy. Managers should also strive to understand the level of decision involvement and the relative influence of brand attitude/salience on brand choice intention. Originality/value This study advances the literature on charitable giving by proposing and testing a moderated mediation model of donor choice when selecting a charity for donation. Findings provide new insights into the extent to which brand salience, brand attitude and donor decision-making influence how new donors choose between charities for donation.


Author(s):  
Aaron J. Siegler ◽  
Alex de Voux ◽  
Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya ◽  
Linda-Gail Bekker ◽  
Patrick S. Sullivan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maggie Toplak ◽  
Jala Rizeq

There is a long tradition of studying children’s reasoning and thinking in cognitive development and education. The initial studies in the cognitive development of reasoning were motivated by Piagetian models, and developmental age was thought to bring the gradual onset of logical thinking. The introduction of heuristics and biases tasks in adults and dual process models have provided new perspectives for understanding the development of reasoning, judgment, and decision-making skills. These heuristics and biases tasks provided a way to operationalize the systematic errors that people make in their judgments. Dual process models have advanced our understanding of the basic processes implicated in both optimal and non-optimal responders on several types of paradigms, including heuristics and biases tasks and classic reasoning paradigms. Importantly, these skills and competencies are generally separable from the types of higher cognition assessed on measures of intelligence and executive function task performance. Given the history of the study of reasoning in cognitive development, there is a need to integrate our understanding across these somewhat separate literatures. This is especially true given the opposite predictions that seem to be suggested in these different research traditions. Specifically, there is a focus on increasing logical development in the classic cognitive developmental literature and alternatively, there has been a focus on systematic errors in judgment and decision-making in the study of reasoning in adults. This article provides an integration of the two aforementioned perspectives that are rooted in different empirical and historical traditions. These considerations are addressed by drawing upon their research traditions and by summarizing more recent developmental work that has investigated these paradigms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document