Pregnancy Morbidity in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: What Is the Impact of Treatment?

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme R. de Jesús ◽  
Gustavo Rodrigues ◽  
Nilson R. de Jesús ◽  
Roger A. Levy
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Treatment of Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Rationale of Current Management—An Insight into Future Approaches

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola ◽  
Tania Ubiali ◽  
Pier Luigi Meroni
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
Current Management ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Insight Into

Vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity represent the clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which is serologically characterized by the persistent positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents currently provide the mainstay of APS treatment. However, the debate is still open: controversies involve the intensity and the duration of anticoagulation and the treatment of stroke and refractory cases. Unfortunately, the literature cannot provide definite answers to these controversial issues as it is flawed by many limitations, mainly due to the recruitment of patients not fulfilling laboratory and clinical criteria for APS. The recommended therapeutic management of different aPL-related clinical manifestations is hereby presented, with a critical appraisal of the evidence supporting such approaches. Cutting edge therapeutic strategies are also discussed, presenting the pioneer reports about the efficacy of novel pharmacological agents in APS. Thanks to a better understanding of aPL pathogenic mechanisms, new therapeutic targets will soon be explored. Much work is still to be done to unravel the most controversial issues about APS management: future studies are warranted to define the optimal management according to aPL risk profile and to assess the impact of a strict control of cardiovascular risk factors on disease control.

scholarly journals Complementemia in pregnancies with antiphospholipid syndrome

Lupus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 1503-1509 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Tabacco ◽  
A Giannini ◽  
C Garufi ◽  
A Botta ◽  
S Salvi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Clinical Events ◽  
Low Dose Aspirin ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Patients Experience ◽  
The Impact

Prognosis of pregnancies in women with antiphospholipid syndrome has dramatically improved over the past two decades using conventional treatment with low molecular weight heparin and low-dose aspirin. However, despite this regimen, 10–15% of antiphospholipid syndrome patients experience pregnancy losses. Several studies have been performed in order to identify risk factors predictive of complications. Thrombosis has been generally accepted as the key pathogenetic mechanism underlying pregnancy morbidity. However, the thrombogenic state alone is not able to explain all the different mechanisms leading to pregnancy failure. In fact, emerging evidence shows that complement pathway could play an important role in mediating clinical events in antiphospholipid syndrome. However, the exact mechanism through which complement mediates antiphospholipid syndrome complications remains unknown. Low complement levels (C3 and C4) are associated with poor pregnancy outcome in women with antiphospholipid syndrome in different studies. Hypocomplementemia could be indicated as an early predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome, available at the beginning of pregnancy for starting, if necessary, additional treatment to conventional therapy. However, future studies need to better understand the impact of low complement level on antiphospholipid syndrome pregnancy outcome.

Maternal-Fetal Management in Trombophilia Related and Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 2396-2401
Author(s):  
Costin Berceanu ◽  
Elena Loredana Ciurea ◽  
Monica Mihaela Cirstoiu ◽  
Sabina Berceanu ◽  
Anca Maria Ofiteru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Pregnancy Complications ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Placental Insufficiency ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Specific Therapy ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Control Study

It is widely accepted that thrombophilia in pregnancy greatly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism. Pregnancy complications arise, at least partly, from placental insufficiency. Any change in the functioning of the gestational transient biological system, such as inherited or acquired thrombophilia, might lead to placental insufficiency. In this research we included 64 pregnant women with trombophilia and 70 cases non-trombophilic pregnant women, with or without PMPC, over a two-year period. The purpose of this multicenter case-control study is to analyze the maternal-fetal management options in obstetric thrombophilia, the impact of this pathology on the placental structure and possible correlations with placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. Maternal-fetal management in obstetric thrombophilia means preconceptional or early diagnosis, prevention of pregnancy morbidity, specific therapy as quickly as possible and fetal systematic surveilance to identify the possible occurrence of placenta-mediated pregnancy complications.

scholarly journals POS0712 “EXTRA”- CRITERIA ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN PATIENTS WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (PRELIMINARY DATA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 605.2-606
Author(s):  
F. Cheldieva ◽  
T. Reshetnyak ◽  
M. Cherkasova ◽  
N. Seredavkina ◽  
A. Lila
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Past History ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

Background:The study of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), not included in the Sydney diagnostic criteria, in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is poorly understood.Objectives:To determine the frequency of detection of IgA-aCL and IgA-aβ2GP1 and IgG antibodies to β2GP1 domain 1 (IgG-aβ2GP1-D1) in patients with APS with and without SLE.Methods:ELISA and chemiluminescence assays (CMA) were used to test 63 sera of patients: 22 (35%) with primary APS (pAPS) and 41 (65%) patients with APS and with SLE (secondary APS (sAPS)), with mean age 38,0 [33,0 – 43,0] years and disease duration 4,0 [0,1 – 9,9]. Both methods were used to test of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1. CMA was used for research IgG/IgM/IgA-aCL, IgG/IgM/IgA-aβ2GPI and IgG-aβ2GP1-D1. Of them 49 (78%) (18 – with pAPS; 31 – with sAPS) displayed major thrombotic events and 18 of 22 pregnant women had pregnancy morbidity in past history. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity was in 9 out of 12 patients who had it determined. LA was not investigated due to anticoagulant therapy in the remaining 52 patients.Results:IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aß2GP1 were recorded in 44/18 and 50/17 patients by ELISA and in 55/19 and 59/16 by CMA, respectively.IgA-aCL positivity was found in 35 (56%) of 63 patients. Thirty IgA-positive patients were positive for IgG-aCL by ELISA: 22 – IgG-aCL – highly positive, 6 – medium positive and 2 – low positive patients. IgM-aCL by ELISA was detected in 13 (37%) of 35 IgA-aCL positive patients: 11 – highly positive, 1 – medium positive and 1 – low positive. IgA-aCL was combined with IgG-aCL in 34 patients and with IgM-aCL in 16 patients in the CMA. IgG-aß2GP1 in ELISA was detected in 32 patients with IgA-aCL (24 –highly positive, 5 – medium positive and 3 – low positive) and in 34 – in CMA. IgM-aß2GP1 was combined with IgA-aß2GP1 with the same frequency in both methods (in 13 patients).IgA-aß2GP1 was detected in 30 (48%) of 63 patients. They were combined with both IgG-aCL and IgG-aß2GP1 in all cases in both methods. IgM-aCL and IgM-aß2GP1 were detected in 14 and 11 of 30 patients with IgA-aß2GP1, respectively. The combination of IgA-aß2GP1 with IgG-aCL by ELISA was in 27 (in most cases highly positive – 20) and with IgM-aCL – in 10 (highly positive - 8). IgG-aß2GP1 was detected in 28 patients with IgA-aß2GP1 (high positive – 21) and in 11 patients with IgM-aß2GP1 (high positive –7).IgG-aß2GP1-D1 was revealed in 48 (76%) patients. It was combined with IgG-aCL – in 38, with IgM-aCL – in 15 patients by the ELISA. The combination of IgG-aß2GP1-D1 by CMA was as follows: with IgG-aCL – in 46, with IgM-aCL – in 17, and with IgA-aCL – in 33 patients. In most cases, IgG-aß2gp1-D1 was combined with highly positive aCL levels. IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was associated with IgG-aß2GP1 positivity in 42 – by ELISA and 47 – by CMA, IgМ-aβ2GP1 – in 13 and 14 patients by ELISA and CMA, respectively, and IgA-aß2GP1 – in 29. Isolated IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was not observed.Conclusion:The frequency of IgA-aCL detection was 56% (35 patients out of 63), IgA-aβ2GP1 – 48% (30 patients out of 63), IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 – 76% (48 patients out of 63). There was not isolated positivity of this “extra” criterial antibodies. The presence of IgA-aCL, IgA-aβ2GP1, IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 was associated with highly positivity of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM- aβ2GP1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB1240 C4B BINDING PROTEIN AND WARFARIN IN THE ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1911.2-1911
Author(s):  
G. Grosso ◽  
K. Sandholm ◽  
I. Gunnarsson ◽  
A. Zickert ◽  
A. Vikerfors ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Mediation Analysis ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Protein Isoforms ◽  
Type I ◽  
Complement Inhibitor ◽  
Warfarin Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Background:Complement plays a role in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). C4b Binding Protein (C4BP) is a complement inhibitor with anticoagulant function (1). It belongs to the same protein family as β2GPI, the main antigen in APS. Its main isoform is bound to protein S in the circulation. Levels of both protein S and C4BP are known to be reduced by warfarin treatment (2) as well as by aPL, directly and indirectly.Objectives:To investigate the levels of C4BP in primary (p) and secondary (s) APS, also considering warfarin treatment.Methods:The total amount of C4BP (C4BPt) was measured by using magnetic carboxylated microspheres which were coupled with a monoclonal antibody against the α-chain of human-C4BP to capture the antigen. To detect C4BPt the same antibody was used, biotinylated. The binding of biotinylated antibodies was detected by streptavidin-phycoerythrin and data were collected using a MAGPIX Multiplex Reader. Using independent t-test, we compared C4BP in 118 SLE patients with repeated positivity for Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (39/118 on warfarin), 291 aPL negative SLE patients (16/291 on warfarin), 67 pAPS (33/67 on warfarin), and 322 controls (none on warfarin). We then performed an interaction and a mediation analysis (3) in the SLE group to study the impact of warfarin on C4BP levels: since warfarin is mostly prescribed to aPL+ patients, it is considered a mediator in the reducing effect of aPL on C4BP. Therefore we compared individuals exposed and non-exposed to the presence of aPL with or without the mediator warfarin and calculated the percentage of reduction in C4BP that could be attributed to aPL or warfarin.Results:Overall C4BP is 20% reduced in aPL+ patients (fig 1), independently of SLE, past thrombotic events and nephritis. Warfarin treated patients have lower levels of C4BP (fig 2). According to mediation analysis 11% of C4BP reduction is due to aPL and 9% to warfarin.Figure 1.C4BP in different subgroups (67 pAPS, 118 SLEaPL+, 291 SLEaPL-, 322 controls)Figure 2.C4BP in 67 pAPS patients, 33/67 on warfarinConclusion:Both aPL and warfarin decrease levels of C4BP, a complement and coagulation regulator. Reduction of this complement inhibitor could contribute to complement activation and thrombosis in APS. Our results raise new questions regarding the effects of warfarin treatment on complement and coagulation in APS.References:[1]Dahlbäck B. C4b-binding protein: a forgotten factor in thrombosis and hemostasis. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2011; 37(4): 355.[2]Zöller B, García de Frutos P, Dahlbäck B. Evaluation of the relationship between protein S and C4b-binding protein isoforms in hereditary protein S deficiency demonstrating type I and type III deficiencies to be phenotypic variants of the same genetic disease. Blood 1995; 85(12): 3524.[3]Vanderweele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Statistics and Its Interface 2009; 2(4): 457-68.Disclaimer:AV is employed at the Swedish Medical Products Agency, the views expressed in this paper are the personal views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the Governement AgencyAcknowledgments:Thanks to the Biostatistics Core Facility, Karolinska UniversityDisclosure of Interests:None declared

The antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome

2011 ◽  
pp. 343-352
Author(s):  
Alan J. Hakim ◽  
Gavin P.R. Clunie ◽  
Inam Haq
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

Introduction 344 Epidemiology and pathology 345 Clinical features of antiphospholipid syndrome 346 Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome 348 Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome 350 The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was first described in the 1980s and comprises arterial and venous thrombosis with or without pregnancy morbidity in the presence of anticardiolipin (ACL) antibodies or the lupus anticoagulant (LAC). It can be primary, or secondary to other autoimmune diseases, most commonly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (...

Central serous chorioretinopathy and antiphospholipid syndrome: Three cases report

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 096120332097973
Author(s):  
Paul Billoir ◽  
Adrien Michon ◽  
Luc Darnige
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent venous or arterial thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity, with persistently presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We report three cases of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) associated with APS.

scholarly journals Is there a role for immunosuppression in antiphospholipid syndrome?

Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 426-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ecem Sevim ◽  
Rohan Willis ◽  
Doruk Erkan
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Vascular Endothelial Cell ◽  
Autoimmune Disorder ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Rheumatologic Disease ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Disease Modifying Agents ◽  
Cell Inhibition

Abstract Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity, or nonthrombotic manifestations in patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Conventional APS treatment focuses on antithrombotic strategies, which are usually ineffective for the microvascular and nonthrombotic manifestations of aPL. Using a case-based presentation, this review focuses on the role of immunosuppression in nonobstetric APS, including B-cell inhibition (rituximab, belimumab, and bortezomib), complement inhibition (eculizumab), mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibition (sirolimus), vascular endothelial cell modulation (defibrotide), statins, and traditional rheumatologic disease–modifying agents (hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document