Effects of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Seminiferous Tubules and SelW, GPx4, LHCGR, and ACE Expression in Chicken Testis

2016 ◽  
Vol 173 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Khalid ◽  
Nagam Khudhair ◽  
Huang He ◽  
Zheng Peng ◽  
Tian Yaguang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
He Huang ◽  
Xiaoyan Jiao ◽  
Yanmin Xu ◽  
Qi Han ◽  
Wanying Jiao ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. FISHER ◽  
J. MONTEMURRO ◽  
C. HOOGENDOORN

Three sets of identical twin cows were used to quantitate the excretion of selenium in feces, urine and milk in response to increments of dietary selenium. The first trial consisted of three test periods, each 8 days long, separated by recovery periods of 5 days. A solution of sodium selenite was applied to the grain portion of the ration to provide 0, 6.0, 12.0, 24.0 and 48.0 or 100.0 mg of sodium selenite per day. Samples of milk, urine and feces were collected on the last 2 days of each treatment period and analyzed for selenium. There was a significant, positive linear (P < 0.05) response between excretion of selenium in feces and increments of dietary selenium. There was a marked but variable response in selenium content of urine to dietary intake but selenium levels in milk were not increased above those of control animals. In a second trial, sodium selenite was fed at the rate of 170 and 260 mg per day for 10 days. These theoretically toxic levels resulted in 10- and 40-fold increases in the selenium levels of feces and urine, respectively, but only a 3-fold increase in selenium content of milk. At these high levels of selenium supplementation the amounts of selenium in the kidney and liver were increased above the normal values. This study shows that selenium in the form of sodium selenite would have to be fed at levels toxic to the cow before there would be any measurable increase of selenium in milk.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iqra Bano ◽  
◽  
M. Malhi ◽  
S.A. Soomro ◽  
Safia Kandhro ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabiha Seboussi ◽  
Bernard Faye ◽  
Ghaleb Alhadrami ◽  
Mustafa Askar ◽  
Wissam Ibrahim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Davide Nacamulli ◽  
Caterina Mian ◽  
Daniela Petricca ◽  
Francesca Lazzarotto ◽  
Susi Barollo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. I. Muhammad ◽  
A. M. Dalia ◽  
T. C. Loh ◽  
H. Akit ◽  
A. A. Samsudin

Abstract Background The oviduct of a hen provides a conducive environment for egg formation, which needs a large amount of mineral elements from the blood via trans-epithelial permeability. Eggshell is the calcified layer on the outside of an egg that provides protection and is critical for egg quality. However, little is known about the genes or proteins involved in eggshell formation, and their relationship to dietary microminerals. We hypothesized that dietary selenium supplementation in chickens will influence genes involved in eggshell biomineralization, and improve laying hen antioxidant capacity. The objective of this research was to investigate how organic and inorganic dietary selenium supplementation affected mRNA expression of shell gland genes involved in eggshell biomineralization, and selenoproteins gene expression in Lohman Brown-Classic laying hens. Results Shell gland (Uterus) and liver tissue samples were collected from hens during the active growth phase of calcification (15–20 h post-ovulation) for RT-PCR analysis. In the oviduct (shell gland and magnum) and liver of laying hens, the relative expression of functional eggshell and hepatic selenoproteins genes was investigated. Results of qPCR confirmed the higher (p < 0.05) mRNA expression of OC-17 and OC-116 in shell gland of organic Se hen compared to inorganic and basal diet treatments. Similarly, dietary Se treatments affected the mRNA expression of OCX-32 and OCX-36 in the shell gland of laying hens. In the magnum, mRNA expression of OC-17 was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in hens fed-bacterial organic, while OC-116 mRNA expression was down-regulated in dietary Se supplemented groups compared to non-Se supplemented hens. Moreover, when compared to sodium selenite, only ADS18 bacterial Se showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher mRNA levels in GPX1, GPX4, DIO1, DIO2 and SELW1, while Se-yeast showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher mRNA levels in TXNRD1 than the non-Se group. Conclusions Dietary Se supplementation especially that from a bacterial organic source, improved shell gland and hepatic selenoproteins gene expression in laying hens, indicating that it could be used as a viable alternative source of Se in laying hens. The findings could suggest that organic Se upregulation of shell gland genes and hepatic selenoproteins in laying hens is efficient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document