Time Perspective, Intended Academic Engagement, and Academic Performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 761-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Barnett ◽  
Patrick R. Melugin ◽  
Joseph Hernandez
2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 2320-2330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Barnett ◽  
Joseph Hernandez ◽  
Patrick R. Melugin

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether contact with future possible selves impacts individuals’ outcome expectancies, intended behaviors, and long-term outcomes with regard to academic performance. Specifically, we investigated whether having college students attempt to connect with an academically successful or unsuccessful future possible self through a message composition activity would impact their perceived likelihood of getting a good grade point average, intended academic engagement (i.e., intentions to attend class, study, etc.), and academic performance as measured by grade point average over two subsequent semesters. The study was novel in that we considered the role of temporal position—that is, the current self contacting a future possible self or a future possible self contacting the current self. Results found that students who composed a message from an academically unsuccessful future possible self to their current self had lower outcome expectancies—that is, they believed that they had less chance of obtaining a good grade point average—and lower intended academic engagement than a control group that composed a message to a friend; however, the groups did not vary in academic performance. It is possible that contact with a future possible self that was academically unsuccessful introduced a form of learned helplessness in those participants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany A. Bugbee ◽  
Kenneth H. Beck ◽  
Craig S. Fryer ◽  
Amelia M. Arria

Author(s):  
Maria Francesca Freda ◽  
De Luca Picione Raffaele ◽  
Giovanna Esposito ◽  
Giancarlo Ragozini ◽  
Italo Testa

AbstractDespite the growing interest on the notion of academic engagement (AE) and its relevance for students’ success, a few valid and reliable instruments on AE have been developed. Moreover, most of the available measures consider AE as a student’s trait rather than a relational and situated dynamic process. This study presents the development and validation of a new instrument, the SInAPSi Academic Engagement Scale (SAES), which was developed within a project coordinated by the SInAPSi center of the Authors’ University and it aims to measure AE. The main sample was constituted by 680 students and a convenience sample of 312 biology and biotechnologies students was also involved to perform the confirmatory factor analysis of the initial factor structure of the SAES. Construct validity was assessed using the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI), while criterion-related validity was established with the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS), the students’ confidence in one’s own preparation for academic studies and their academic performance. Results show that the SAES presents a robust factor structure, a good convergent and discriminant validity, and satisfactory psychometric properties. Furthermore, the SAES shows a positive correlation with the USEI and the AMS, the students’ confidence in their preparation for academic studies and their academic performance. The results indicate that the SAES can produce valid and reliable data on AE and it may have strong implications for assessing AE and implementing intervention programs for university students.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Ian Clark

This article has two inseparable aims: (a) to analyse the relative merits of single-sex and co-educational constructs on self-concept, academic performance and academic engagement; (b) to investigate the manner in which each type of schooling interacts with the individual student; student “peers,” close family, and teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document