scholarly journals Low-tension gas process in high-salinity and low-permeability reservoirs

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1329-1344
Author(s):  
Alolika Das ◽  
Nhut Nguyen ◽  
Quoc P. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Oxidative Degradation ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Fractional Flow ◽  
Hydrocarbon Gases ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Abstract Polymer-based EOR methods in low-permeability reservoirs face injectivity issues and increased fracturing due to near wellbore plugging, as well as high-pressure gradients in these reservoirs. Polymer may cause pore blockage and undergo shear degradation and even oxidative degradation at high temperatures in the presence of very hard brine. Low-tension gas (LTG) flooding has the potential to be applied successfully for low-permeability carbonate reservoirs even in the presence of high formation brine salinity. In LTG flooding, the interfacial tension between oil and water is reduced to ultra-low values (10−3 dyne/cm) by injecting an optimized surfactant formulation to maximize mobilization of residual oil post-waterflood. Gas (nitrogen, hydrocarbon gases or CO2) is co-injected along with the surfactant slug to generate in situ foam which reduces the mobility ratio between the displaced (oil) and displacing phases, thus improving the displacement efficiency of the oil. In this work, the mechanism governing LTG flooding in low-permeability, high-salinity reservoirs was studied at a microscopic level using microemulsion properties and on a macroscopic scale by laboratory-scale coreflooding experiments. The main injection parameters studied were injected slug salinity and the interrelation between surfactant concentration and injected foam quality, and how they influence oil mobilization and displacement efficiency. Qualitative assessment of the results was performed by studying oil recovery, oil fractional flow, oil bank breakthrough and effluent salinity and pressure drop characteristics.

Development of the Surfactant-Based Chemical EOR Formula for Low Permeability Reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Chun Zhou ◽  
Meng Lu ◽  
Fuchen Liu ◽  
Wenhong Li ◽  
Jianshen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Behavior ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Aqueous Solubility ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Chemical Flooding ◽  
Residual Oil ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Abstract Based on the results of the foam flooding for our low permeability reservoirs, we have explored the possibility of using low interfacial tension (IFT) surfactants to improve oil recovery. The objective of this work is to develop a robust low-tension surfactant formula through lab experiments to investigate several key factors for surfactant-based chemical flooding. Microemulsion phase behavior and aqueous solubility experiments at reservoir temperature were performed to develop the surfactant formula. After reviewing surfactant processes in literature and evaluating over 200 formulas using commercially available surfactants, we found that we may have long ignored the challenges of achieving aqueous stability and optimal microemulsion phase behavior for surfactant formulations in low salinity environments. A surfactant formula with a low IFT does not always result in a good microemulsion phase behavior. Therefore, a novel synergistic blend with two surfactants in the formulation was developed with a cost-effective nonionic surfactant. The formula exhibits an increased aqueous solubility, a lower optimum salinity, and an ultra-low IFT in the range of 10-4 mN/m. There were challenges of using a spinning drop tensiometer to measure the IFT of the black crude oil and the injection water at reservoir conditions. We managed the process and studied the IFTs of formulas with good Winsor type III phase behavior results. Several microemulsion phase behavior test methods were investigated, and a practical and rapid test method is proposed to be used in the field under operational conditions. Reservoir core flooding experiments including SP (surfactant-polymer) and LTG (low-tension-gas) were conducted to evaluate the oil recovery. SP flooding with a selected polymer for mobility control and a co-solvent recovered 76% of the waterflood residual oil. Furthermore, 98% residual crude oil recovery was achieved by LTG flooding through using an additional foaming agent and nitrogen. These results demonstrate a favorable mobilization and displacement of the residual oil for low permeability reservoirs. In summary, microemulsion phase behavior and aqueous solubility tests were used to develop coreflood formulations for low salinity, low temperature conditions. The formulation achieved significant oil recovery for both SP flooding and LTG flooding. Key factors for the low-tension surfactant-based chemical flooding are good microemulsion phase behavior, a reasonably aqueous stability, and a decent low IFT.

scholarly journals Study on three phase foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery in extra-low permeability reservoirs

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Zhou ◽  
Juncheng Bu ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Xiao Guo ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Foam Stability ◽  
Temperature Tolerance ◽  
Resistance Coefficient ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Profile Control ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Poly (MSt-MMA) nanosphere as foam stabilizing agent was synthesized by emulsion polymerization. The three phase foam was prepared with Disodium 4-Dodecyl-2,4′-Oxydiben Zenesulfonate (DOZS) as foaming agent, Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide (HPAM) and synthesized poly (MSt-MMA) nanospheres as the mixed foam stabilizing agents. It had outstanding foaming performance and foam stability. The optimal three phase foam system consisting of 0.12 wt% HPAM, 0.04 wt% poly (MSt-MMA) nanospheres and 0.12 wt% DOZS by orthogonal experiment, had high apparent viscosity, which showed that three components had a very good synergistic effect. The three phase foam’s temperature tolerance and salt tolerance were researched in laboratory tests. Flooding oil experiment showed that the average displacement efficiency of three phase foam system was 16.1 wt% in single core experiments and 21.7 wt% in double core experiments. Resistance coefficient of low permeability core was more than those of high permeability core, but their residual resistance coefficients were small. The results of core experiment and pilot test indicated that the three phase foam had good profile control ability and generated low damage to the low permeability layer for extra-low permeability reservoirs. Three phase foam flooding has great prospects for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in extra-low permeability reservoirs.

Lab Studies of MEOR Strains Optimization for High Salinity Reservoirs

2011 ◽  
Vol 343-344 ◽  
pp. 844-848
Author(s):  
Jing Chun Wu ◽  
Xiao Ming Lv ◽  
Zhi Jie Ou ◽  
Dai Yin Yin
Keyword(s):  
Crude Oil ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Produced Water ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Displacement Effect ◽  
Physical Experiments ◽  
Fermentation Liquor ◽  
Laboratory Results ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

.Aiming at the high salinity at low-permeability reservoirs, a strain named S-4 that can yield a kind of bio-surfactants was screened from the produced water of oil wells in use of the Hemolysis of the bio-surfactants and its characteristics of making the color of blue gel plate change in its formation process. The laboratory results show that the surface tension of the strains fermentation liquor becomes less than 30mN/m after cultured by crude oil as the carbon source, and it would remain at the value of 31mN/m even if the concentration becomes a half; this bio-surfactant keeps stable when the salinity is in the range of 4000mg/L～50000mg/L; In physical experiments the strains can improve crude oil recovery ratio by 4% which shows a good oil displacement effect.

Low Tension Gas Process in High Salinity and Low Permeability Reservoirs

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alolika Das ◽  
Nhut Nguyen ◽  
Abdullah Alkindi ◽  
Rouhi Farajzadeh ◽  
Nasser Azri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Salinity ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Low Tension ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Low tension gas flooding for secondary oil recovery in low-permeability, high-salinity reservoirs

Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 116601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alolika Das ◽  
Nhut Nguyen ◽  
Quoc P. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Gas Flooding ◽  
Secondary Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Tension

ASSESSMENT OF OIL WELL PRODUCTIVITY IN LOW-PERMEABILITY RESERVOIRS IN THE FIELDS OF EASTERN SIBERIA

2017 ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
R. V. Urvantsev ◽  
S. E. Cheban
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil Extraction ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Oil Well ◽  
Eastern Siberia ◽  
Development Costs ◽  
Traditional Fields ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

The 21st century witnessed the development of the oil extraction industry in Russia due to the intensifica- tion of its production at the existing traditional fields of Western Siberia, the Volga region and other oil-extracting regions, and due discovering new oil and gas provinces. At that time the path to the development of fields in Eastern Siberia was already paved. The large-scale discoveries of a number of fields made here in the 70s-80s of the 20th century are only being developed now. The process of development itself is rather slow in view of a number of reasons. Create a problem of high cost value of oil extraction in the region. One of the major tasks is obtaining the maximum oil recovery factor while reducing the development costs. The carbonate layer lying within the Katangsky suite is low-permeability, and its inventories are categorised as hard to recover. Now, the object is at a stage of trial development,which foregrounds researches on selecting the effective methods of oil extraction.

The Combined Flooding of Dispersed Particle Gel and Surfactant for Conformance Control and EOR: From Experiment to Pilot Test

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xia Yin ◽  
Tianyi Zhao ◽  
Jie Yi
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Formation Energy ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Surfactant Solution ◽  
Pilot Test ◽  
Control Performance ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Displacement Efficiency ◽  
Conformance Control ◽  
And Performance

Abstract The water channeling and excess water production led to the decreasing formation energy in the oilfield. Therefore, the combined flooding with dispersed particle gel (DPG) and surfactant was conducted for conformance control and enhanced oil recovery in a high temperature (100-110°C) high salinity (>2.1×105mg/L) channel reservoir of block X in Tahe oilfield. This paper reports the experimental results and pilot test for the combined flooding in a well group of Block X. In the experiment part, the interfacial tension, emulsifying capacity of the surfactant and the particle size during aging of DPG were measured, then, the conformance control and enhanced oil recovery performance of the combined flooding was evaluated by core flooding experiment. In the pilot test, the geological backgrounds and developing history of the block was introduced. Then, an integrated study of EOR and conformance control performance in the block X are analyzed by real-time monitoring and performance after treatment. In addition, the well selection criteria and flooding optimization were clarified. In this combined flooding, DPG is applied as in-depth conformance control agent to increase the sweep efficiency, and surfactant solution slug following is used for improve the displacement efficiency. The long term stability of DPG for 15 days ensures the efficiency of in-depth conformance control and its size can increase from its original 0.543μm to 35.5μm after aging for 7 days in the 2.17×105mg/L reservoir water and at 110°C. In the optimization, it is found that 0.35% NAC-1+ 0.25% NAC-2 surfactant solution with interfacial tension 3.2×10-2mN/m can form a relatively stable emulsion easily with the dehydrated crude oil. In the double core flooding, the conformance control performance is confirmed by the diversion of fluid after combined flooding and EOR increases by 21.3%. After exploitation of Block X for 14 years, the fast decreasing formation energy due to lack of large bottom water and water fingering resulted in a decreasing production rate and increasing watercut. After combined flooding in Y well group with 1 injector and 3 producers, the average dynamic liquid level, daily production, and tracing agent breakthrough time increased, while the watercut and infectivity index decreased. The distribution rate of injected fluid and real-time monitoring also assured the conformance control performance. The oil production of this well group was increased by over 3000 tons. Upon this throughout study of combined flooding from experiment to case study, adjusting the heterogeneity by DPG combined with increasing displacement efficiency of surfactant enhanced the oil recovery synergistically in this high salinity high temperature reservoir. The criteria for the selection and performance of combined flooding also provides practical experiences and principles for combined flooding.

The Research and Evaluation of Finely Layered Water Injection Standard in Low-Permeability Reservoirs - A Case from Block A in one Low-Permeability Reservoir

2014 ◽  
Vol 1073-1076 ◽  
pp. 2310-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Xian Wang ◽  
Wan Jing Luo ◽  
Jie Ding
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Injection Pressure ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Reservoir Permeability ◽  
Engineering Parameters ◽  
The Common ◽  
Common Problems ◽  
Low Permeability Reservoirs

Due to the common problems of waterflood in low-permeability reservoirs, the reasearch of finely layered water injection is carried out. This paper established the finely layered water injection standard in low-permeability reservoirs and analysed the sensitivity of engineering parameters as well as evaluated the effect of the finely layered water injection standard in Block A with the semi-quantitative to quantitative method. The results show that: according to the finely layered water injection standard, it can be divided into three types: layered water injection between the layers, layered water injection in inner layer, layered water injection between fracture segment and no-fracture segment. Under the guidance of the standard, it sloved the problem of uneven absorption profile in Block A in some degree and could improve the oil recovery by 3.5%. The sensitivity analysis shows that good performance of finely layered water injection in Block A requires the reservoir permeability ratio should be less than 10, the perforation thickness should not exceed 10 m, the amount of layered injection layers should be less than 3, the surface injection pressure should be below 14 MPa and the injection rate shuold be controlled at about 35 m3/d.

Application of Miscible Ethane Foam for Gas EOR Conformance in Low-Permeability Heterogeneous Harsh Environments

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 1871-1883
Author(s):  
Mohamad Salman ◽  
Konstantinos Kostarelos ◽  
Pushpesh Sharma ◽  
Jae Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Total Dissolved Solids ◽  
Harsh Environments ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Type I ◽  
Fracture Networks ◽  
Operational Conditions ◽  
Minimum Miscibility Pressure ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

Summary Unconventional plays pose a challenging set of operational conditions, including high temperature, high salinity, low permeability, and fracture networks. Aggressive development of these plays and the low primary recovery factors present an opportunity for using enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. This work presents a laboratory investigation of miscible ethane (C2H6) foam for gas EOR conformance in low-permeability, heterogeneous, harsh environments [<15 md, 136,000 ppm total dissolved solids (TDS) with divalent ions, 165°F]. The use of C2H6 as an alternative to carbon dioxide (CO2) offers several operational and availability strengths, which might expand gas EOR applications to depleted or shallower wells. Coupling gas conformance also helps improve displacement efficiencies and maximize overall recovery. Minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) displacement tests were performed for dead crude oil from the Wolfcamp Spraberry Trend area using C2H6 and CO2. Aqueous stability, salinity scan, and static foam tests were performed to identify a formulation. Subsequent foam quality and coreflood displacement tests in heterogeneous carbonate outcrop cores were conducted to compare the recovery efficiencies of three processes: gravity-unstable, miscible C2H6 foam; gravity-stable, miscible C2H6; and gravity-unstable, miscible C2H6 processes. Slimtube tests comparing C2H6 to CO2 resulted in a lower MMP value for C2H6. We identified a stable surfactant blend capable of Type I microemulsion and persistent foams in the presence of oil. Corefloods conducted with gravity-unstable miscible C2H6 foam, gravity-stable miscible C2H6, and gravity-unstable miscible C2H6 recovered 98.4, 61.9, and 42.6% oil originally in place, respectively. Our work shows that miscible C2H6 injection processes achieved significant recoveries even under gravity-unstable conditions. The addition of foam provides better conformance control, enhancing overall recovery at the laboratory scale, showing promise for field applications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document