scholarly journals Antiangiogenic therapy in breast cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Peter Gampenrieder ◽  
Theresa Westphal ◽  
Richard Greil
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy

scholarly journals Antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer with triple negative phenotype

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Inna P. Ganshina ◽  
Kristina A. Ivanova ◽  
Olga O. Gordeeva ◽  
Aleksandr V. Arkhipov ◽  
Liudmila G. Zhukova
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Triple Negative Phenotype ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Negative Phenotype

Triple-negative breast cancer is 1024% of all cases of breast cancer and is characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2 receptors in the tumor. The therapy of this illness is a difficult clinical case. In contrast to hormone-positive and HER-2-positive phenotypes, in which we successfully use targeted drugs (antiestrogens and anti-HER-2 drugs), for triple-negative breast cancer we have not had such targets for a long time. Thus, despite the impressive results of immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer, there remains a fairly large group of patients with negative PD-L1 status, for whom it is necessary to develop other treatment strategies. One of the approaches in the treatment of malignant tumors includes not the impact on tumor cells, but the process of angiogenesis. Antiangiogenic drugs have positively proven themselves in the treatment of a large number of malignant tumors but are underestimated for breast cancer (including triple-negative phenotype). The use of bevacizumab in combinations with cytostatic drugs in breast cancer therapy (including triple-negative breast cancer) has been studied in a large number of clinical trials but was undeservedly forgotten in some countries due to the revoked FDA registration. This review presents the role of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer and suggests the conditions when the administration of this drug is justified and leads to better results.

Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using sinapic acid: an underpinning step towards antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desingh Raj Preeth ◽  
Manickaraj Shairam ◽  
Natarajan Suganya ◽  
Roshandel Hootan ◽  
Ravishankar Kartik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Copper Oxide ◽  
Green Synthesis ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Sinapic Acid ◽  
Copper Oxide Nanoparticles ◽  
Oxide Nanoparticles

Changes in circulating endothelial cells (CEL) in patients receiving trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer predict response to treatment

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 579-579
Author(s):  
P. Spadaro ◽  
M. Ingemi ◽  
G. Dottore ◽  
G. Toscano ◽  
R. Maisano
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her 2

579 Background: Amplification or overexpression of HER-2/neu has been identified in 10–20% of invasive breast cancers and is associated with shorter overall survival times; furthermore HER-2/neu is a predictive factor with regard to monoclonal antibody therapy with Trastuzumab. The observed association between the overexpression of HER-2/neu and higher VEGF expression indicates that HER-2/neu is involved, at least partly, in the regulation of angiogenesis in human breast cancer. Recently circulating endothelial cells (CECs) have been proposed as a marker of tumor progression and/or a response to antiangiogenic therapy; thus, we have performed a phase II study to explore the correlation between CECs and treatment with Trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer Methods: 22 women aged ≥ 18 years with histologically proven Her-2-positive, ECOG performance status 0 to 2 who were not eligible for, or who wished to delay receiving chemotherapy received a standard loading dose of Trastuzumab 4 mg/Kg followed by 2 mg/Kg weekly. The weekly maintenance dose was continued until disease progression. A panel of monoclonal antibodies including anti CD45 to exclude hematopoietic cells, anti CD31, CD34, CD36, CD105, CD106, CD133, and KDR and appropriate analysis gates were used to enumerate resting and activated circulating endothelial cells Results: The overall response rate (RC + RP) to treatment was 25% (2 RC + 3RP). In healthy controls (N° 20) mean values of resting and activated CECs were 7.6/μL (4.6 - 11.2/μL) and 1.3/μL (0.1 - 2.4 /μL) respectively. Before treatment with Trastuzuamb the mean resting and activated CECs were 41.1/μL (16.4 - 60.5/μL) and 6.9/μL (5.1 - 8.7/μL). At a first assessment (6 wks) a significant decrease in CECs (p<0.001)was found in patients responding to treatment but not in the patients who did not achieve a remission Conclusions: Our finding has shown that resting and activated CECs are increased in metastatic breast cancer patients and decline during treatment in responding patients, furthermore, these data underline the crucial role of angiogenesis in this setting and support the rationale for a combination of Bevacizumab with Trastuzumab. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I dose escalation study of sunitinib plus capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3592-3592 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sweeney ◽  
C. Verschraegen ◽  
G. Chiorean ◽  
F. Lee ◽  
S. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

3592 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, approved internationally for the treatment of advanced RCC and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GIST. This phase I study assesses the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SU in combination with capecitabine (C). Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative therapy, previously treated with =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, and ECOG PS =1 were eligible. Prior antiangiogenic therapy was not permitted. Three SU schedules were evaluated: 4 wks on treatment followed by 2 wks off in 6-wk cycles (4/2 schedule); 2 wks on followed by 1 wk off in 3-wk cycles (2/1 schedule), and continuous dosing (CD schedule). In all cases C was administered orally bid on days 1–14. SU and C doses were alternately escalated in serial pt cohorts to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SU for all schedules using a standard 3 + 3 design. PK and antitumor efficacy were also assessed. Results: A total of 50 pts have been enrolled; 28 pts have been treated on the 4/2 schedule: SU 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2, and SU 37.5 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 were not tolerated. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: grade 3 myalgia (n=1), grade 3 fatigue (n=2), and grade 3 hand- foot syndrome (n=2). The MTD for the 4/2 schedule was SU 37.5 mg/day + C 1,000 mg/m2. No DLTs nor dose reductions were observed among 9 pts treated at the MTD. Preliminary PK data do not indicate drug-drug interactions between SU and C. 3 pts (1 each with breast cancer, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma) achieved confirmed partial responses. On the 2/1 schedule patients are being accrued to SU 37.5 or 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 and doses of SU 37.5 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 or SU 25 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 are being explored on the CD schedule. Conclusions: The combination of SU 37.5 mg/day (4/2 schedule) with C 1,000 mg/m2 in pts with advanced solid tumors appears tolerable. SU may be administered in combination with C with no apparent drug-drug interaction. Subsequent cohorts will define the MTD of SU administered on the 2/1 and CD schedules. Further studies of this combination in breast cancer are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

VEGFR2 cytoplasmic expression (VEGFR2ce) in relation to survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab (Bev).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11523-11523
Author(s):  
Roseana Melo Borba ◽  
Tiago Cordeiro Felismino ◽  
Alexandre Andre B. A. Da Costa ◽  
Vladmir C. Lima ◽  
Marcelo Corassa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Tumor Subtypes

11523 Background: Bev is a monoclonal antibody that binds to VEGFA that demonstrated improved progression free survival (PFS) in MBC clinical trials. VEGFR2, NOTCH1, Integrin a1b2 and ILK are angiogenesis-related proteins possibly related with Bev efficacy. The correlation of these proteins expression and Bev survival variables was evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1st line chemotherapy in two HER2 negative MBC cohorts. Pts were treated between May-07 and July-14. Cohort 1 (C1) was treated with paclitaxel and Cohort 2 (C2) with paclitaxel and Bev. Expression of biomarkers was determined by immunohistochemistry. Tumor samples were arranged on a tissue microarray. Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox model was used in multivariate analysis. Results: C1 had 42 pts. Median age was 63y. Tumor subtypes were divided in luminal (92.9%) and triple negative (TN) (7.1%). Visceral metastasis (mets) were present in 71.4%. Median follow-up (mFUP) time was 32.1m. mPFS was 8.0m and mOS was 33.5m. C2 had 29 pts. Median age was 57y. Luminal 79.3%; TN 20.7%; Visceral mets 79.3%; mFUP 38m. mPFS was 10.5m and mOS was 47m. In C2, high VEGFR2ce was correlated with improved PFS (high VEGFR2 16.5m x low VEGFR2 6.8m, p = 0.025). Breast cancer subtype, metastasis pattern and VEGFR2 expression were included in the multivariate analysis for PFS. VEGFR2 remained as independent factor (HR 0.35; IC95% 0.14 – 0.85, p = 0.021). In C1, VEGFR2 was not correlated with improved PFS (high VEGFR2 8.6m x low VEGFR2 8.0m, p = 0.24). Other markers were not associated with PFS. Conclusions: High VEGFR2ce was associated with increased PFS in patients treated with Bev. In MBC VEGFR2 may have a role as a predictive tool on benefit of antiangiogenic therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document