Effect of Intracoronary and Intravenous Melatonin on Myocardial Salvage Index in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 470-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Ekeloef ◽  
Natalie Halladin ◽  
Siv Fonnes ◽  
Svend Eggert Jensen ◽  
Tomas Zaremba ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Mokhtari ◽  
Mahin Akbarzadeh ◽  
David Sparv ◽  
Pallonji Bhiladvala ◽  
Håkan Arheden ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Oxygen (O2) treatment has been a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with myocardial infarction. Recent studies, however, state that supplemental O2 therapy may have no effect or harmful effects in these patients. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the effect of O2 therapy in patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) based on the culprit vessel; Left Anterior Descending Artery (LAD) or Non-LAD. Methods This was a two-center, investigator-initiated, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial at the Skåne university hospital, Sweden. A simple computer-generated randomization was used. Patients were either randomized to standard care with O2 therapy (10 l/min) or air until the end of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The patients underwent a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) days 2–6. The main outcome measures were Myocardium at Risk (MaR), Infarct Size (IS) and Myocardial Salvage Index (MSI) as measured by CMRI, and median high-sensitive troponin T (hs-cTnT). Results A total of 229 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 160 of them were randomized to the oxygen or air arm. Because of primarily technical problems with the CMRI, 95 patients were included in the final analyses; 46 in the oxygen arm and 49 in the air arm. There were no significant differences between patients with LAD and Non-LAD as culprit vessel with regard to their allocation (oxygen or air) with regards to MSI, MaR, IS and hs-cTnT. Conclusion The results indicate that the location of the culprit vessel has probably no effect on the role of supplemental oxygen therapy in STEMI patients. Trial registration Swedish Medical Products Agency (EudraCT No. 2011–001452-11) and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT01423929).


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henricus J Duckers ◽  
Piotr Musialiek ◽  
Daiusz Dudek ◽  
Janusz Kochman ◽  
Steven Kesten ◽  
...  

Objectives: The ADVANCE clinical trial sought to define the safety, feasibility and efficacy of an intracoronary infusion of adipose derived regenerative cells in patients admitted with an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 24 hours of successful primary PCI. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (n=23, 2:1 randomization), within 24 hours of successful primary PCI following STEMI, a small volume liposuction was performed for fat harvest and ADRC isolation by an automated Celution® System, and intracoronary infusion within 12 hours of the liposuction. Results: 23 patients were enrolled to date (all male, age 58 years, BMI 28 kg/m 2 ). The liposuction procedure data are shown in the table TEMI patients were routinely treated with dual anti platelets and heparin. The decline in hemoglobin following the liposuction procedure from baseline over the 10 hours following the procedure was 10.2% ±7.6 (mean ± SD) Although two patients had >20% of Hb decline at anytime (maximum 20.8%), one of these patients returned to within 10% of baseline by 10 hours without transfusion. The liposuction procedure was completed in all but one patient (terminated early due to hypotension - resolved with termination of procedure). IC infusion of the ADRC suspension was performed successfully in all patients. No impediment of coronary TIMI flow was observed during or following cell infusion of these mesenchymal-like cells. No ventricular arrhythmias were observed during cell infusion. No major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCE) occurred within 30 days of the procedures. Conclusion: Limited liposuction to harvest fat for ADRC stem cell isolation and subsequent intracoronary infusion of these autologous ADRCs can be performed safely in patients with acute STEMI under dual antiplatelets therapy, demonstrating feasibility of the therapeutic application of point-of-care cell therapy using ADRCs.


Open Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo M van Dongen ◽  
Joëlle Elias ◽  
K Gert van Houwelingen ◽  
Pierfrancesco Agostoni ◽  
Bimmer E P M Claessen ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe impact on cardiac function of collaterals towards a concomitant chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been investigated yet. Therefore, we have evaluated the impact of well-developed collaterals compared with poorly developed collaterals to a concomitant CTO in STEMI.Methods and resultsIn the EXPLORE trial, patients with STEMI and a concomitant CTO were randomised to either CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or no-CTO PCI. Collateral grades were scored angiographically using the Rentrop grade classification. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) at 4 months were measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Well-developed collaterals (Rentrop grades 2–3) to the CTO were present in 162 (54%) patients; these patients had a significantly higher LVEF at 4 months (46.2±11.4% vs 42.1±12.7%, p=0.004) as well as a trend for a lower LVEDV (208.2±55.7 mL vs 222.6±68.5 mL, p=0.054) when compared with patients with poorly developed collaterals to the CTO. There was no significant difference in the total amount of scar in the two groups. Event rates were statistically comparable between patients with well-developed collaterals and poorly developed collaterals to the CTO at long-term follow-up.ConclusionsIn patients with STEMI and a concomitant CTO, the presence of well-developed collaterals to a concomitant CTO is associated with a better LVEF at 4 months. However, this effect on LVEF did not translate into improvement in clinical outcome. Therefore, the presence of well-developed collaterals is important, but should not solely guide in the clinical decision-making process regarding any additional revascularisation of a concomitant CTO in patients with STEMI.Clinical trial registrationNTR1108.


Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Paul M. Haller ◽  
Bernhard Jäger ◽  
Edita Piackova ◽  
Larissa Sztulman ◽  
Claudia Wegberger ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as a cellular communication tool with cardioprotective properties; however, it is unknown whether cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) involves EVs. (2) Methods: We randomized patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to additionally receive a protocol of RIC or a sham-intervention. Blood was taken before and immediately, 24 h, four days and one month after PCI. Additionally, we investigated EVs from healthy volunteers undergoing RIC. EVs were characterized by a high-sensitive flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Cytoflex S, Krefeld, Germany). (3) Results: We analyzed 32 patients (16 RIC, 16 control) and five healthy volunteers. We investigated platelet-, endothelial-, leukocyte-, monocyte- and granulocyte-derived EVs and their pro-thrombotic sub-populations expressing superficial phosphatidylserine (PS+). We did not observe a significant effect of RIC on the numbers of circulating EVs, although granulocyte-derived EVs were significantly higher in the RIC group. In line, RIC had not impact on EVs in healthy volunteers. Additionally, we observed changes of PS+/PEV, EEVs and PS+/CD15+ EVs irrespective of RIC with time following STEMI. 4) Conclusion: We provide further insights into the course of different circulating EVs during the acute and sub-acute phases of STEMI. With respect to the investigated EV populations, RIC seems to have no effect, with only minor differences found for granulocyte EVs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document