In situ assembly of magnetic nanocrystals/graphene oxide nanosheets on tumor cells enables efficient cancer therapy

Nano Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1133-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyang Liu ◽  
Yang Lu ◽  
Qilin Yu ◽  
Shu-Hong Yu
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yugal Kishore Mohanta ◽  
Kunal Biswas ◽  
Pradipta Ranjan Rauta ◽  
Debashis De ◽  
Abeer Hashem ◽  
...  

Abstract Recent advances in nanotechnology and nano biomaterials have attracted considerable attention in the field of cancer therapy. The development of biocompatible nanotherapeutics that selectively target cancer cells is a prime area of interest and current research. The use of graphene is being explored in a variety of sciences, ranging from electronics to biomedical fields. In the present study, graphene oxide nanosheets were synthesized using a modified Hummer’s method. FTIR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and X-Ray Diffraction analyses were used to characterize the as-synthesized nanosheets. FE-SEM and HR-TEM were also used to examine the structure of the as-synthesized nanosheets. Surface topography and thickness measurements were also conducted by Atomic Force Microscopy. Results indicated that the lateral thickness of the graphene nanosheets was approximately 6.45 nm, which was corroborated by the TEM and AFM analyses. Characteristic defect peaks observed in Raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy images along with the respective EDAX calculations confirmed the formation of graphene nanosheets. The potential biomedical application of graphene nanosheets was evaluated by assessing the cytotoxicity of the graphene nanosheets against human breast adenocarcinoma [MDA-MB-231] and HaCaT normal cell lines. Two different in-vitro, anti-oxidant activity assays of Graphene Oxide [GO] were employed, namely DPPH radical and the H2O2 scavenging activity. Antioxidant activity of GO was assessed in a measured concentration-dependent manner to better understand the cytotoxicity of the GO sheets in the different cell lines. The in-vitro tests revealed that the GO sheets had a high level of cytotoxicity to the human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells that was concentration dependent. In contrast, the cytotoxicity of the GO sheets against the HaCaT normal cell line was marginal, suggesting that the graphene nanosheets could be safely used in cancer therapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Huang ◽  
Liping Zhong ◽  
Zhiming Deng ◽  
Pan Wu ◽  
Jian He ◽  
...  

Abstract In this study we show for the first time that a reduced graphene oxide (rGO) carrier has a 15-fold higher catalysis rate than graphene oxide (GO) in Ag+ reduction. Based on this, we constructed a tumor microenvironment-enabled in situ silver-based electrochemical oncolytic bioreactor (SEOB) which unlocked an Ag+ prodrug to generate silver nanoparticles and inhibited the growth of various tumors. In this bioreactor system, intratumoral H2O2 acted as the reductant and the rGO carrier acted as the catalyst. Chelation of aptamers to this prodrug increased the production of silver nanoparticles by tumor cells, especially in the presence of Vitamin C, which broke down in tumor cells to supply massive amounts of H2O2. Consequently, highly efficient silver nanoparticle-induced apoptosis was observed in HepG2 and A549 cells in vitro and in HepG2- and A549-derived tumors in vivo. The apoptosis was associated with ROS-induced changes in mitochondrial membrane potential and DNA damage. The specific aptamer targeting and intratumoral silver nanoparticle production guaranteed excellent biosafety, with no damage to normal cells, because the Ag+ prodrug was specifically unlocked in tumors. More significantly, there was no evident tissue damage in monkeys, which greatly increases the clinical translation potential of the SEOB system.


RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (85) ◽  
pp. 54031-54038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuefang Zhang ◽  
Jia Liu ◽  
Yahong Zhang ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Yuping Duan

Hierarchical nanocomposites of aligned polyaniline nanorods on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets are synthesized in an in situ polymerization process.


2014 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Dai ◽  
Luhua Lu ◽  
Changhao Liang ◽  
Jianming Dai ◽  
Qinzhuang Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document