BACKGROUND
Standard behavioral weight loss interventions often set uniform physical activity (PA) goals and promote PA self-monitoring; however, adherence remains a challenge and recommendations may not accommodate all individuals. Identifying patterns of PA goal attainment and self-monitoring behavior will offer a deeper understanding of how individuals adhere to different types of commonly prescribed PA recommendations (ie., minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA] and daily steps) and guide future recommendations for improved intervention effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined weekly patterns of adherence to steps-based and minutes-based PA goals and self-monitoring behavior during a 6-month online behavioral weight loss intervention.
METHODS
Participants were prescribed weekly PA goals for steps (7,000 to 10,000 steps/day) and minutes of MVPA (50 to 200 minutes/week) as part of a lifestyle program. Goals gradually increased during the initial 2 months, followed by 4 months of fixed goals. PA was self-reported daily on the study website. For each week, participants were categorized as “adherent” if they self-monitored their PA and met the program PA goal, “suboptimally adherent” if they self-monitored but did not meet the program goal, or “nonadherent” if they did not self-monitor. The probability of transitioning into a less adherent status was examined using multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS
Individuals (N=212) were predominantly middle-aged females with obesity, and 31.6% self-identified as a racial/ethnic minority. Initially, 34.4% were categorized as “adherent” to steps-based goals (51.9% “suboptimally adherent” and 13.7% “nonadherent”), and there was a high probability of either remaining “suboptimally adherent” from week-to-week or transitioning to a “nonadherent” status. On the other hand, 70.3% of individuals started out “adherent” to minutes-based goals (16.0% “suboptimally adherent” and 13.7% “nonadherent”), with “suboptimally adherent” seen as the most variable status. During the graded goal phase, individuals were more likely to transition to a less adherent status for minutes-based goals (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.31-1.48) compared to steps-based goals (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.30); however, no differences were seen during the fixed goal phase (minutes-based goals: OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05, 1.08 versus steps-based goals: OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.08).
CONCLUSIONS
States of vulnerability to poor PA adherence can emerge rapidly and early in obesity treatment. There is a window of opportunity within the initial two months to bring more people towards “adherent” behavior, especially those who fail to meet the prescribed goals but engage in self-monitoring. While this study describes the probability of adhering to steps-based and minutes-based targets, it will be prudent to determine how individual characteristics and contextual states relate to these behavioral patterns, which can inform how best to adapt interventions.
CLINICALTRIAL
This study was a secondary analysis of a pre-registered randomized trial (Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02688621).
Improvement in 6-min Walk Test Distance Following Treatment for Behavioral Weight Loss and Disinhibited Eating: an Exploratory Secondary Analysis
