adaptive intervention
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

84
(FIVE YEARS 46)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 2)

10.2196/33568 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e33568
Author(s):  
Stephanie P Goldstein ◽  
Fengqing Zhang ◽  
Predrag Klasnja ◽  
Adam Hoover ◽  
Rena R Wing ◽  
...  

Background Behavioral obesity treatment (BOT) is a gold standard approach to weight loss and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, frequent lapses from the recommended diet stymie weight loss and prevent individuals from actualizing the health benefits of BOT. There is a need for innovative treatment solutions to improve adherence to the prescribed diet in BOT. Objective The aim of this study is to optimize a smartphone-based just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) that uses daily surveys to assess triggers for dietary lapses and deliver interventions when the risk of lapse is high. A microrandomized trial design will evaluate the efficacy of any interventions (ie, theory-driven or a generic alert to risk) on the proximal outcome of lapses during BOT, compare the effects of theory-driven interventions with generic risk alerts on the proximal outcome of lapse, and examine contextual moderators of interventions. Methods Adults with overweight or obesity and cardiovascular disease risk (n=159) will participate in a 6-month web-based BOT while using the JITAI to prevent dietary lapses. Each time the JITAI detects elevated lapse risk, the participant will be randomized to no intervention, a generic risk alert, or 1 of 4 theory-driven interventions (ie, enhanced education, building self-efficacy, fostering motivation, and improving self-regulation). The primary outcome will be the occurrence of lapse in the 2.5 hours following randomization. Contextual moderators of intervention efficacy will also be explored (eg, location and time of day). The data will inform an optimized JITAI that selects the theory-driven approach most likely to prevent lapses in a given moment. Results The recruitment for the microrandomized trial began on April 19, 2021, and is ongoing. Conclusions This study will optimize a JITAI for dietary lapses so that it empirically tailors the provision of evidence-based intervention to the individual and context. The finalized JITAI will be evaluated for efficacy in a future randomized controlled trial of distal health outcomes (eg, weight loss). Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04784585; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04784585 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/33568


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
Caitlin Connelly ◽  
Kyungmin Kim ◽  
Yin Liu ◽  
Steven Zarit

Abstract Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are taxing for both the person with dementia (PWD) and their family caregivers. Yet, little is known about how BPSD fluctuates throughout the day (i.e., morning, daytime, evening, and night; e.g., sundowning) and how caregivers perceive BPSD at different times of the day. Using 8-day daily diary data from 173 family caregivers whose relatives were using Adult Day Services (ADS), this study investigated temporal patterns of BPSD and caregivers’ stress responses to BPSD throughout the day. Overall, the number of BPSD was highest in the evening, and caregivers’ stress reactivity to BPSD increased throughout the phases of the day (i.e., most stressful at night). However, caregivers showed lower reactivity to BPSD in the mornings and at night on days when the PWD used ADS. Our findings about fluctuations of (caregiver reactions to) BPSD throughout the day suggest target windows for just-in-time adaptive intervention.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e055930
Author(s):  
Constance P Fontanet ◽  
Niteesh K Choudhry ◽  
Wendy Wood ◽  
Ted Robertson ◽  
Nancy Haff ◽  
...  

IntroductionMedication adherence for patients with chronic conditions such as gout, a debilitating form of arthritis that requires daily medication to prevent flares, is a costly problem. Existing interventions to improve medication adherence have only been moderately effective. Habit formation theory is a promising strategy to improve adherence. The cue-reward-repetition principle posits that habits are formed by repeatedly completing an activity after the same cue and having the action rewarded every time. Over time, cues become increasingly important whereas rewards become less salient because the action becomes automatic. Leveraging the cue-reward-repetition principle could improve adherence to daily gout medications.Methods and analysisThis three-arm parallel randomised controlled trial tests an adaptive intervention that leverages the repetition cue-reward principle. The trial will began recruitment in August 2021 in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Eligible patients are adults with gout who have been prescribed a daily oral medication for gout and whose most recent uric acid is above 6 mg/dL. Participants will be randomised to one of three arms and given electronic pill bottles. In the two intervention arms, participants will select a daily activity to link to their medication-taking (cue) and a charity to which money will be donated every time they take their medication (reward). Participants in Arm 1 will receive reminder texts about their cue and their charity reward amount will be US$0.50 per day of medication taken. Arm 2 will be adaptive; participants will receive a US$0.25 per adherent-day and no reminder texts. If their adherence is <75% 6 weeks postrandomisation, their reward will increase to US$0.50 per adherent-day and they will receive reminder texts. The primary outcome is adherence to gout medications over 18 weeks.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has ethical approval in the USA. Results will be published in a publicly accessible peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT04776161


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Trippler ◽  
Jan Hattendorf ◽  
Said Mohammed Ali ◽  
Shaali Makame Ame ◽  
Saleh Juma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Global elimination of schistosomiasis as a public health problem is set as target in the new World Health Organization’s Neglected Tropical Diseases Roadmap for 2030. Due to a long history of interventions, the Zanzibar islands of Tanzania have reached this goal since 2017. However, challenges occur on the last mile towards interruption of transmission. Our study will investigate new tools and strategies for breaking schistosomiasis transmission. Methods The study is designed as an intervention study, documented through repeated cross-sectional surveys (2020–2024). The primary endpoint will be the sensitivity of a surveillance-response approach to detect and react to outbreaks of urogenital schistosomiasis over three years of implementation. The surveys and multi-disciplinary interventions will be implemented in 20 communities in the north of Pemba island. In low-prevalence areas, surveillance-response will consist of active, passive and reactive case detection, treatment of positive individuals, and focal snail control. In hotspot areas, mass drug administration, snail control and behaviour change interventions will be implemented. Parasitological cross-sectional surveys in 20 communities and their main primary schools will serve to adapt the intervention approach annually and to monitor the performance of the surveillance-response approach and impact of interventions. Schistosoma haematobium infections will be diagnosed using reagent strips and urine filtration microscopy, and by exploring novel point-of-care diagnostic tests. Discussion Our study will shed light on the field applicability and performance of novel adaptive intervention strategies, and standard and new diagnostic tools for schistosomiasis elimination. The evidence and experiences generated by micro-mapping of S. haematobium infections at community level, micro-targeting of new adaptive intervention approaches, and application of novel diagnostic tools can guide future strategic plans for schistosomiasis elimination in Zanzibar and inform other countries aiming for interruption of transmission. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISCRCTN91431493. Registered 11 February 2020, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN91431493


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie P Goldstein ◽  
Fengqing Zhang ◽  
Predrag Klasnja ◽  
Adam Hoover ◽  
Rena R Wing ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Behavioral obesity treatment (BOT) is a gold standard approach to weight loss and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, frequent lapses from the recommended diet stymie weight loss and prevent individuals from actualizing the health benefits of BOT. There is a need for innovative treatment solutions to improve adherence to the prescribed diet in BOT. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to optimize a smartphone-based just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) that uses daily surveys to assess triggers for dietary lapses and deliver interventions when the risk of lapse is high. A microrandomized trial design will evaluate the efficacy of any interventions (ie, theory-driven or a generic alert to risk) on the proximal outcome of lapses during BOT, compare the effects of theory-driven interventions with generic risk alerts on the proximal outcome of lapse, and examine contextual moderators of interventions. METHODS Adults with overweight or obesity and cardiovascular disease risk (n=159) will participate in a 6-month web-based BOT while using the JITAI to prevent dietary lapses. Each time the JITAI detects elevated lapse risk, the participant will be randomized to no intervention, a generic risk alert, or 1 of 4 theory-driven interventions (ie, enhanced education, building self-efficacy, fostering motivation, and improving self-regulation). The primary outcome will be the occurrence of lapse in the 2.5 hours following randomization. Contextual moderators of intervention efficacy will also be explored (eg, location and time of day). The data will inform an optimized JITAI that selects the theory-driven approach most likely to prevent lapses in a given moment. RESULTS The recruitment for the microrandomized trial began on April 19, 2021, and is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS This study will optimize a JITAI for dietary lapses so that it empirically tailors the provision of evidence-based intervention to the individual and context. The finalized JITAI will be evaluated for efficacy in a future randomized controlled trial of distal health outcomes (eg, weight loss). CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04784585; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04784585 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/33568


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Lara N. Coughlin ◽  
Inbal Nahum-Shani ◽  
Erin E. Bonar ◽  
Meredith L. Philyaw-Kotov ◽  
Mashfiqui Rabbi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Guofa Zhou ◽  
Ming-chieh Lee ◽  
Xiaoming Wang ◽  
Daibin Zhong ◽  
Elizabeth Hemming-Schroeder ◽  
...  

There are a number of available and emerging malaria intervention tools that require innovative trial designs to find the optimal combinations at given epidemiologic settings. We simulated intervention strategies based on adaptive interventions, which included long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), piperonyl butoxide–treated LLINs (PBO-LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and long-lasting microbial larviciding (LLML). The aims were to determine if PBO-LLINs or LLIN+IRS combination is more effective for initial interventions than LLINs and to identify the most effective intervention. We used a clustered, randomized adaptive trial design with malaria infection prevalence (MIP) as the outcome variable. The results indicate that during the initial stage of interventions, compared with regular LLINs, PBO-LLINs (relative reduction [RR]: 29.3%) and LLIN plus IRS with alternative-insecticide (RR: 26.8%) significantly reduced MIP. In the subsequent interventions, adding alternative insecticide IRS (RR: 23.8%) or LLML (RR: 31.2%) to existing PBO-LLIN was effective in further reducing MIP. During the next stage of interventions, adding LLML on top of PBO-LLIN+IRS (with alternative insecticides) had a significant impact on MIP (RR: 39.2%). However, adding IRS (with alternative insecticides) on top of PBO-LLIN+LLML did not significantly reduce MIP (11.6%). Overall, in clusters initiated with PBO-LLIN, adding LLML would be the most effective strategy in reducing MIP; in clusters initiated with LLIN+IRS, replacing LLIN+IRS with PBO-LLIN and LLML would be the most effective in reducing MIP. This study provides a new pathway for informing the optimal integrated malaria vector interventions, and the new strategy can be tested in field trials.


Author(s):  
Nancy E Sherwood ◽  
A Lauren Crain ◽  
Elisabeth M Seburg ◽  
Meghan L Butryn ◽  
Evan M Forman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background State-of-the-art behavioral weight loss treatment (SBT) can lead to clinically meaningful weight loss, but only 30–60% achieve this goal. Developing adaptive interventions that change based on individual progress could increase the number of people who benefit. Purpose Conduct a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) to determine the optimal time to identify SBT suboptimal responders and whether it is better to switch to portion-controlled meals (PCM) or acceptance-based treatment (ABT). Method The BestFIT trial enrolled 468 adults with obesity who started SBT and were randomized to treatment response assessment at Session 3 (Early TRA) or 7 (Late TRA). Suboptimal responders were re-randomized to PCM or ABT. Responders continued SBT. Primary outcomes were weight change at 6 and 18 months. Results PCM participants lost more weight at 6 months (−18.4 lbs, 95% CI −20.5, −16.2) than ABT participants (−15.7 lbs, 95% CI: −18.0, −13.4), but this difference was not statistically significant (−2.7 lbs, 95% CI: −5.8, 0.5, p = .09). PCM and ABT participant 18 month weight loss did not differ. Early and Late TRA participants had similar weight losses (p = .96), however, Early TRA PCM participants lost more weight than Late TRA PCM participants (p = .03). Conclusions Results suggest adaptive intervention sequences that warrant further research (e.g., identify suboptimal responders at Session 3, use PCMs as second-stage treatment). Utilizing the SMART methodology to develop an adaptive weight loss intervention that would outperform gold standard SBT in a randomized controlled trial is an important next step, but may require additional optimization work. Clinical Trial information ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT02368002


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document