scholarly journals Routines: towards the Complexity of Organizational Intentionality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Tomasz Makowski
Keyword(s):  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Vantage Point ◽  
Philosophy Of Action ◽  
Organizational Routines ◽  
Organizational Research ◽  
Cognitive Mechanism ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Intentional Explanations ◽  
Similarities And Differences

AbstractThe paper explores the topic of organizational routines from a philosophical vantage point to see how the philosophy of action may help improve its understanding in organizational research. The main goal is to show the distinctive complexity of the intentional picture of routines. In this respect, the paper clarifies the interrelations between psychological habits and routines and describes similarities and differences between them. It also highlights the special place of mindfulness as a psycho-cognitive mechanism of action meta-control in intentional explanations of routine complexity.

scholarly journals Routines: towards the complexity of organizational intentionality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Tomasz Makowski
Keyword(s):  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Vantage Point ◽  
Philosophy Of Action ◽  
Organizational Routines ◽  
Organizational Research ◽  
Cognitive Mechanism ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Intentional Explanations ◽  
Similarities And Differences

The paper explores the topic of organizational routines from a philosophical vantage point to see how the philosophy of action may help improve its understanding in organizational research. The main goal is to show the distinctive complexity of the intentional picture of routines. In this respect, the paper clarifies the interrelations between psychological habits and routines and describes similarities and differences between them. It also highlights the special place of mindfulness as a psycho-cognitive mechanism of action meta-control in intentional explanations of routine complexity.

scholarly journals ФЭНТЕЗИ ВА ФАНТАСТИК АСАРЛАР МИКРООЛАМИ

2019 ◽  
pp. 205-213
Author(s):  
Dilshod NASRIDDINOV
Keyword(s):  
Internal Structure ◽  
Modern Literature ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Literary Movement ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Human Thinking ◽  
Problematic Situations ◽  
Cultural Fantasy

Мақолада инсон хаёлоти маҳсули бўлган фэнтезива фантастика феноменига муносабат билдирилган. Бу икки дунёнинг ички кўриниши, ўхшаш ва фарқли жиҳатлари диаграммалар ёрдамида асосланган. Муаллиф фикрлари тадқиқотчи ва ёзувчилар қарашлари асосида илмий далилланган. Фэнтезива фантастика лексик бирликлари ҳақида адабиётшунослик ва таржимага оид луғатларга таянган ҳолда маълумотлар берилган. Ҳарбир феноменнинг таркибий қисми ва уларнинг ўзига хос турлари ажратиб кўрсатилган. Фантастика бўйича турли қарашларнинг мавжудлиги, замонавий адабиётда фантастикани фэнтези йўналиши билан фарқлантириб турувчи жиҳатлари, ўзбек фолклоршунослигида фэнтези тушунчаси таркибида асосий рол ўйнаган мифология ва унинг турли кўринишлари ҳақида маълумотлар келтирилган ва асосланган. Тақдим этилган маълумотлар орасида фэнтези тушунчасини жанр сифатида баҳолаган тадқиқотчиларнинг фикрлари мавжуд, уларга қарши айтилган назарий фикрлар, яъни фэнтези феноменининг жанр, субжанр ёки адабий оқим эканлиги хусусида аниқ хулоса мавжуд эмаслиги таъкидланган. Турли-туман фикрлар, қарашлар ва олимларнинг илмий ёндашувларига изоҳлар келтирилган. Фэнтезининг муаммоли вазиятига қараб: “қаҳрамонлик фэнтези”, “готик фэнтези”, “насронийча фэнтези”, “маданийлашган фэнтези” каби кўринишлари мавжудлиги очиб берилган. Афсоналарда мавжуд мифологик образлар фэнтезининг асосий қуроли эканлигига урғу берилган, мифология тушунчаси ва унинг турларига изоҳ бериб ўтилган. В статье рассмотрены разные тенденции относительно феноменов фэнтези и фантастика как результат человеческого мышления. Внутренняя структура, сходства и различия этих двух миров показаны на схемах. В статьеприводятсяотдельные сведения о лексических единицах фэнтези и фантастики из различных литературоведческих и переводных толковых словарей. Отдельно описаны составная частьи своеобразные типы каждого феномена. Представлены и обоснованы сведения о наличии различных взглядов на фантастику, ее отличительных чертах отфэнтези в современной литературе, а также о мифологии и ее видах, занимающих особое место в структуре фэнтези, из источников узбекской фольклористики. Среди представленных сведений имеются мнения исследователей относительно понятия фэнтези как жанра, даются также противоположные данному мнению теории, то есть сделана попыткаопределить, куда отнестипонятиефэнтези: к жанру, субжанру или литературному течению. Приведены пояснения к различным мнениям, взглядам и научным подходам ученых-исследователей. Также в статье охарактеризовано наличие различных видов фэнтези в зависимости от проблемных ситуаций: «героическое фэнтези», «готическое фэнтези», «фэнтези по-христиански» и «культурное фэнтези». Мифологические образы, созданные в легендах, отмечены как основное орудие фэнтези. The article discusses various trends regarding the phenomena of “fantasy” and “fiction” as a result of human thinking. The internal structure, similarities and differences of these two worlds are given on the basis of several diagrams. The thoughts cited in the article are scientifically based on the opinions of scientists and researchers, there is a correct approach to the text and explanations for them are given. Separate information is also given on the lexical units of fantasy and fantasy from various literary and translated explanatory dictionaries. Separately described are the component and unique types of each phenomenon. Presented and substantiated information about the presence of different views on fiction, its distinctive features from fantasy in modern literature, as well as about mythology and its forms that occupy a special place in the structure of fantasy, from sources of Uzbek folk writers. Among the information presented, there are researchers' opinions on the concept of fantasy as a genre, theories opposite to this opinion, that is, an attempt was made to find out that there are no exact ideas about attributing the concept of fantasy to genre, subgenre or literary movement. Explained to the different opinions, views and scientific approaches of researchers. The article also describes the presence of various types of fantasy depending on the problematic situations: “heroic fantas”, “gothic fantasy”, “Christian fantasy” and “cultural fantasy”. Mythological images created in the legends are marked as the main fantasy tools, the concept of mythology, its types are described.

scholarly journals Ahmadi Khani's epic "Mam u Zin" based on Epic Characteristics

Twejer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-244
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Mohammed Ebrahim ◽  
◽  
Sirwan Jabar Amin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Middle Ages ◽  
World Literature ◽  
Global Model ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Literary Genre ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
The Middle Ages

Epic is one of the oldest genres in many nations' literature and has occupied an excellent area of world literature. From birth to the middle ages, one of the first genres of literature of many nations It was epic that became the primary genre of the era from Sumerians to Greeks and Romans, and later in the middle centuries. This genre has its specific characteristics and principles that have become the genre's identity for all of the texts under this genre. These characteristics have created the basis for similarities and differences for the literary texts placed under this literary genre. Epic has occupied a special place and states in the literature of the Kurdish nation. Although the Kurdish sample of epic was not like the global model, it still possesses many global epic criteria and assumptions. From this perspective, this research attempts to show how Ahmadi Khani's epic "Mam u Zin" is committed to the characteristics and principles of this genre. In this context, an explanation and analysis have been made for the epic

scholarly journals Konsep Intelegensi Manusia dalam Pemikiran al-Ghazali dan al-Farabi

RELIGIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lukman Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Philosophical Thinking ◽  
Theory Of Intelligence ◽  
Psychological Theories ◽  
Special Place ◽  
The World ◽  
Intelligence Theory ◽  
Similarities And Differences

Al-Ghazali and Al-Farabi are both Muslim figures who have a concern for psychology, especially their thoughts about intelligence. The thoughts of both are interesting to discuss because they have almost the same background in the field of philosophy and Sufism so that the approach in this study is used comparative studies with the object of discussion focused on the thoughts of the two figures. Al-Ghazali and Al-Farabi were two great figures in the world of philosophy and Sufism, besides that they also discussed several psychological theories, especially regarding the theory of intelligence. The results of this study found that there were several similarities and differences regarding the intelligence theory of Al-Ghazali and Al-Farabi, among them, both of which assume that rational souls are the highest position, according to al-Ghazali the soul that occupies the highest level is rational soul (al-aql) which is only possessed by humans. whereas the reason in al-Farabi's philosophical thinking occupies a special place as the base of his epistemology, including the philosophy of metaphysics that is related to creation.

scholarly journals THE MOST PRODUCTIVE SUFFIX -ی [I] OF THE PERSIAN LANGUAGE IN THE MEANING OF GRAMMATICAL PERSON AND THE WAYS OF ITS EXPRESSION IN RUSSIAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 428-433
Author(s):  
Ali Madaeni Avval ◽  
Seyed Reza Hosseininejad ◽  
Seyed Hasan Zahraei
Keyword(s):  
Persian Language ◽  
Special Place ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Similarities And Differences

This article considers the suffix -ی [i], as the most productive suffix in the Persian language, in terms of productivity and formation of structures that express grammatical person. Given the wide range of meanings and the various roles of this suffix in a sentence, the authors focus on studying those words that, in combination with this suffix, express the meaning of person (nominal meaning). In Russian, as in Persian, among affixes, suffixes occupy a special place in terms of the effect on the word belonging to the components of the word. Therefore, given the importance of this suffix in the Persian language and the similarity of the position of suffixes in both languages, the suffix -ی [i] in the Persian language is considered. By translating the examples given in Russian, the similarities and differences of the equivalents of this suffix in both languages are discovered.

Orosensory Perception, Speech Production, and Deafness

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milo E. Bishop ◽  
Robert L. Ringel ◽  
Arthur S. House
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Functional Disorders ◽  
Form Discrimination ◽  
School Subjects ◽  
Oral Form ◽  
Similarities And Differences

The oral form-discrimination abilities of 18 orally educated and oriented deaf high school subjects were determined and compared to those of manually educated and oriented deaf subjects and normal-hearing subjects. The similarities and differences among the responses of the three groups were discussed and then compared to responses elicited from subjects with functional disorders of articulation. In general, the discrimination scores separated the manual deaf from the other two groups, particularly when differences in form shapes were involved in the test. The implications of the results for theories relating orosensory-discrimination abilities are discussed. It is postulated that, while a failure in oroperceptual functioning may lead to disorders of articulation, a failure to use the oral mechanism for speech activities, even in persons with normal orosensory capabilities, may result in poor performance on oroperceptual tasks.

Animals as Social Objects

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verónica Sevillano ◽  
Susan T. Fiske
Keyword(s):  
Social Perception ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Social Responses ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content ◽  
Nonhuman Animals ◽  
Behavioral Tendencies ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Sphere Of Influence

Abstract. Nonhuman animals are typically excluded from the scope of social psychology. This article presents animals as social objects – targets of human social responses – overviewing the similarities and differences with human targets. The focus here is on perceiving animal species as social groups. Reflecting the two fundamental dimensions of humans’ social cognition – perceived warmth (benign or ill intent) and competence (high or low ability), proposed within the Stereotype Content Model ( Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002 ) – animal stereotypes are identified, together with associated prejudices and behavioral tendencies. In line with human intergroup threats, both realistic and symbolic threats associated with animals are reviewed. As a whole, animals appear to be social perception targets within the human sphere of influence and a valid topic for research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document