scholarly journals Dosage Effects of Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonist on the Primary Prophylaxis of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID)-Associated Peptic Ulcers: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Drug Safety ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 711-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying He ◽  
Esther W. Chan ◽  
Kenneth K. C. Man ◽  
Wallis C. Y. Lau ◽  
Wai K. Leung ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Feasson ◽  
Mathilde Debeaupte ◽  
Clément Bidet ◽  
Florence Ader ◽  
François Disant ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e0193800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Hee Nam ◽  
Colleen M. Brensinger ◽  
Warren B. Bilker ◽  
Charles E. Leonard ◽  
Scott E. Kasner ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200982
Author(s):  
Young Hee Nam ◽  
Colleen M. Brensinger ◽  
Warren B. Bilker ◽  
Charles E. Leonard ◽  
Scott E. Kasner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimyung Park ◽  
Seng Chan You ◽  
Jaehyeong Cho ◽  
Chan Hyuk Park ◽  
Woon Shin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: This study aimed to evaluate incidence risk and severe clinical outcomes in COVID-19 disease among short-term users of acid-suppressants in South Korea.Methods: This retrospective cohort study, conducted using a nationwide claims database for South Korea, used data from patients with COVID-19 tested between January 1 and May 15, 2020. Patients aged over 18 years and prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) for more than 7 days were identified. Primary outcome was COVID-19 while secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hospitalization with respiratory disease, or intensive respiratory intervention. Large-scale propensity scores were used to match patients, while the Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to evaluate any association between exposure and outcome(s). The risk estimates were calibrated by using 123 falsification endpoints.Results: We identified 26,166 PPI users and 62,117 H2RA users. After propensity score matching, compared to H2RA use, PPI use was not significantly associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (calibrated hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30–2.19]); moreover, PPI use was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes in COVID-19, namely, hospitalization with respiratory disease (calibrated HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.72–1.08]), intensive respiratory interventions (calibrated HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.46–1.82]), except for all-cause mortality (calibrated HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.31–0.95]).Conclusions: In this study, we found that the PPI user was not associated with risk of COVID-19 compared to H2RA users. There was no significant relationship between severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and exposure to PPI compared with H2RA, except for all-cause mortality.


In Vivo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 3297-3303
Author(s):  
YUMI ISHIKURA ◽  
AYAKO MAEDA-MINAMI ◽  
MAIKO HOSOKAWA ◽  
ATSUTO ONODA ◽  
YOHEI KAWANO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document