Hyperspectral imaging of symptoms induced by Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet: comparison of input data and different machine learning algorithms

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-451
Author(s):  
Abel Barreto ◽  
Stefan Paulus ◽  
Mark Varrelmann ◽  
Anne-Katrin Mahlein
Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 4332
Author(s):  
Daniel Jancarczyk ◽  
Marcin Bernaś ◽  
Tomasz Boczar

The paper proposes a method of automatic detection of parameters of a distribution transformer (model, type, and power) from a distance, based on its low-frequency noise spectra. The spectra are registered by sensors and processed by a method based on evolutionary algorithms and machine learning. The method, as input data, uses the frequency spectra of sound pressure levels generated during operation by transformers in the real environment. The model also uses the background characteristic to take under consideration the changing working conditions of the transformers. The method searches for frequency intervals and its resolution using both a classic genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. The interval selection was verified using five state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. The research was conducted on 16 different distribution transformers. As a result, a method was proposed that allows the detection of a specific transformer model, its type, and its power with an accuracy greater than 84%, 99%, and 87%, respectively. The proposed optimization process using the genetic algorithm increased the accuracy by up to 5%, at the same time reducing the input data set significantly (from 80% up to 98%). The machine learning algorithms were selected, which were proven efficient for this task.


2016 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 92-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Antonio Sanz ◽  
Armando M. Fernandes ◽  
Edurne Barrenechea ◽  
Severiano Silva ◽  
Virginia Santos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam C BUITEN

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a part of our daily lives at a fast pace, offering myriad benefits for society. At the same time, there is concern about the unpredictability and uncontrollability of AI. In response, legislators and scholars call for more transparency and explainability of AI. This article considers what it would mean to require transparency of AI. It advocates looking beyond the opaque concept of AI, focusing on the concrete risks and biases of its underlying technology: machine-learning algorithms. The article discusses the biases that algorithms may produce through the input data, the testing of the algorithm and the decision model. Any transparency requirement for algorithms should result in explanations of these biases that are both understandable for the prospective recipients, and technically feasible for producers. Before asking how much transparency the law should require from algorithms, we should therefore consider if the explanation that programmers could offer is useful in specific legal contexts.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 6980
Author(s):  
Yanlin Wei ◽  
Xiaofeng Li ◽  
Xin Pan ◽  
Lei Li

During the processing and planting of soybeans, it is greatly significant that a reliable, rapid, and accurate technique is used to detect soybean varieties. Traditional chemical analysis methods of soybean variety sampling (e.g., mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography) are destructive and time-consuming. In this paper, a robust and accurate method for nondestructive soybean classification is developed through hyperspectral imaging and ensemble machine learning algorithms. Image acquisition, preprocessing, and feature selection are used to obtain different types of soybean hyperspectral features. Based on these features, one of ensemble classifiers-random subspace linear discriminant (RSLD) algorithm is used to classify soybean seeds. Compared with the linear discrimination (LD) and linear support vector machine (LSVM) methods, the results show that the RSLD algorithm in this paper is more stable and reliable. In classifying soybeans in 10, 15, 20, and 25 categories, the RSLD method achieves the highest classification accuracy. When 155 features are used to classify 15 types of soybeans, the classification accuracy of the RSLD method reaches 99.2%, while the classification accuracies of the LD and LSVM methods are only 98.6% and 69.7%, respectively. Therefore, the ensemble classification algorithm RSLD can maintain high classification accuracy when different types and different classification features are used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document