First report of Neoscytalidium novaehollandiae associated with canker and branch dieback on cherry trees in Turkey

California is the second largest sweet cherry producer in the United States with approximately 10,800 ha and an average annual crop value of approximately $150 million. Perennial canker diseases constitute major threats to the cherry industry productivity by reducing tree health, longevity, and yields. During the course of summer 2006, we observed severe limb and branch dieback of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in San Joaquin, San Benito, Contra Costa, and Stanislaus counties of California. Isolation from diseased branches repeatedly yielded the fungus Calosphaeria pulchella (Pers.: Fr.) J. Schröt. (1,2). Cankers and vascular necroses had developed in tree limbs and branches, generally initiating from the heart wood and later spreading into the sapwood. External symptoms of disease may be unapparent throughout the early stages of infection, particularly in large diameter shoots. Older infections often appeared as wilted leaves. Branches and trunks affected with cankers from which C. pulchella was isolated also generally bore perithecia of C. pulchella beneath the periderm. Perithecia were nonstromatic and arranged in dense, circinate groups, with elongated necks converging radially and fissuring the periderm. Asci were unitunicate, clavate, and 45 to 55 × 5 to 5.5 μm. Ascospores were allantoid to suballantoid, hyaline, and 5 to 6 × 1 μm. Colonies on potato dextrose agar (PDA) were dark pink to red in their center with a white margin. Conidia were hyaline, allantoid to oblong-ellipsoidal, and (3–) 4 to 6 (–9) × 1.5 to 2 (–2.5) μm. Identification of C. pulchella isolates also was confirmed by sequence comparison in GenBank database using the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) of the rDNA. Sequences of California isolates shared 100% similarity with C. pulchella reference isolate CBS 115999 (EU367451) (2). ITS sequences of the California isolates used in this study were deposited into GenBank (Nos. HM237297 to HM237300). Pathogenicity of four isolates recovered from the margin of active cankers was determined by branch inoculations. In December 2006, 2- to 4-year-old twigs of P. avium cv. Bing were inoculated with a 5-mm cork borer to remove bark and by placing an agar plug from the growing margin of 8-day-old colonies directly into the fresh wound, mycelium side down. Ten branches per isolate were inoculated. Ten control shoots were inoculated with noncolonized agar plugs. Inoculations were covered with vaseline and wrapped with Parafilm to retain moisture. Branches were harvested in July 2007 and taken to the laboratory to be examined for canker development, and the extent of vascular discoloration in each branch was assessed. Isolations from the edge of discolored tissue were conducted to fulfill Koch's postulates. After 8 months, C. pulchella was reisolated from 100% of the inoculated branches. Length of vascular discoloration averaged 62.5 mm in branches inoculated with the four C. pulchella isolates and 16.5 mm in the control twigs. No fungi were reisolated from the slightly discolored tissue of the controls. To our knowledge, this study constitutes the first report of C. pulchella as a pathogen of sweet cherry trees in California. References: (1) M. E. Barr. Mycologia 77:549, 1985. (2) U. Damm et al. Persoonia 20:39, 2008.

Download Full-text

First Report of a Gall Midge Species (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Associated With Pistachios

Journal of Integrated Pest Management ◽

10.1093/jipm/pmaa022 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Farshid O Sirjani ◽

Edwin E Lewis

Keyword(s):

Gall Midge ◽

Species Level ◽

Plant Tissues ◽

First Report ◽

Branch Dieback ◽

First Time ◽

Level Identification

Abstract A new dipterous pest is reported, for the first time, on commercial pistachios from Sirjan, Kerman province, Iran. The genus of the insect was determined to be Resseliella Seitner (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Adults are light brown to brown in color and 0.8–1.5 mm in length with females, generally, slightly larger than males. Females have an elongated ovipositor, which is characteristic of the genus. Larvae are orange in color, 2–3 mm in length in the later instars, feed under bark without inducing galls, and cause branch dieback on trees of various ages. Brown to black discolorations are observed on plant tissues under bark where the larvae feed. Infestations observed on current and the previous—year’s growths, ranged from 0.5 to 1.2 cm in diameter, and all located in outer branches. Dry leaves and fruit clusters on infested branches remain attached, which may be used to recognize infestation by the gall midge. Dark-colored, sunken spots with splits on the bark located at the base of the wilted sections of the shoots also are symptoms of Resseliella sp. larval activity. Species-level identification of the gall midge is currently underway.

Download Full-text

First Report of Cherry virus A in Sweet Cherry Trees in China

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-93-4-0425b ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 93 (4) ◽

pp. 425-425 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

W.-L. Rao ◽

Z.-K. Zhang ◽

R. Li

Keyword(s):

Sweet Cherry ◽

Community Gardens ◽

Mottle Virus ◽

Replicase Gene ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

First Report ◽

Type Isolate ◽

The Family ◽

Flowering Cherry ◽

Cherry Trees

Plants in the genus Prunus of the family Rosaceae are important fruit and ornamental trees in China. In June of 2007, sweet cherry (Prunus avium) trees with mottling and mosaic symptoms were observed in a private garden near Kunming, Yunnan Province. Twenty-four samples, six each from sweet cherry, sour cherry (P. cerasus), flowering cherry (P. serrulata), and peach (P. persica) were collected from trees in private and community gardens in the area. The peach and sour and flowering cherry trees did not show any symptoms. Total nucleic acids were extracted using a cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB) extraction method, and the extracts were tested for the following eight viruses by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR: American plum line pattern virus, Apple chlorotic leaf spot virus, Cherry green ring mottle virus, Cherry necrotic rusty mottle virus, Cherry virus A (CVA), Little cherry virus 1, Prune dwarf virus, and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus. Only CVA was detected in two symptomatic sweet cherry trees by RT-PCR with forward (5′-GTGGCATTCAACTAGCACCTAT-3′) and reverse (5′-TCAGCTGCCTCAGCTTGGC-3′) primers specific to an 873-bp fragment of the CVA replicase gene (2). The CVA infection of the two trees was confirmed by RT-PCR using primers CVA-7097U and CVA-7383L that amplified a 287-bp fragment from the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the virus (1). Amplicons from both amplifications were cloned and sequenced. Analysis of the predicted amino acid sequences of the 873-bp fragments (GenBank Accession Nos. EU862278 and EU862279) showed that they were 98% identical with each other and 97 to 98% with the type isolate of CVA from Germany (GenBank Accession No. NC_003689). The 286-bp sequences of the 3′-UTR (GenBank Accession Nos. FJ608982 and FJ608983) were 93% identical with each other and 93 to 98% with the type isolate. The sequence indicated that the three isolates were very similar and should be considered to be the same strain. CVA is a member of the genus Capillovirus in the family Flexiviridae and has been previously reported in Europe, North America, and Japan. The contribution of CVA to the symptoms observed and its distribution in China remain to be evaluated. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CVA in sweet cherry in China. References: (1) M. Isogai et al. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 70:288. (2) W. Jelkmann. J. Gen. Virol. 76:2015, 1995.

Download Full-text

First Report of Diplodia mutila Causing Branch Dieback of English Walnut cv. Chandler in the Maule Region, Chile

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-11-17-1860-pdn ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 102 (7) ◽

pp. 1451 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

G. A. Díaz ◽

B. A. Latorre ◽

E. Ferrada ◽

M. Gutiérrez ◽

F. Bravo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

First Report ◽

English Walnut ◽

Branch Dieback

Download Full-text

First Report of Branch Dieback in Mango Trees Caused by Neofusicoccum parvum in Spain

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-05-16-0596-pdn ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 100 (12) ◽

pp. 2529 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

I. Arjona-Girona ◽

C. J. López-Herrera

Keyword(s):

Neofusicoccum Parvum ◽

First Report ◽

Branch Dieback

Download Full-text

First Report of Xylella fastidiosa in Peach in New Mexico

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-10-10-0719 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 95 (7) ◽

pp. 871-871 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

J. J. Randall ◽

J. French ◽

S. Yao ◽

S. F. Hanson ◽

N. P. Goldberg

Keyword(s):

New Mexico ◽

Prunus Persica ◽

Xylella Fastidiosa ◽

Its Region ◽

23S Rrna ◽

Pcr Analysis ◽

Sequencing Analysis ◽

First Report ◽

Dark Green ◽

Branch Dieback

Xylella fastidiosa is a gram-negative bacterium that causes disease in a wide variety of plants such as grapes, citrus trees, oleanders, and elm and coffee trees. This bacterium is xylem limited and causes disease symptoms such as leaf scorch, stunting of plant growth, branch dieback, and fruit loss. The presence of X. fastidiosa was previously reported in New Mexico where it was found to be infecting chitalpa plants and grapevines (3). In the summer of 2010, peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees from two locations in northern New Mexico exhibited leaf deformity and stunting, dark green venation, slight mottling, and branch dieback. Preliminary viral diagnostic screening was performed by Agdia (Elkhart, IN) on one symptomatic tree and it was negative for all viruses tested. Three trees from two different orchards tested positive for X. fastidiosa by ELISA and PCR analysis using X. fastidiosa-specific primer sets HL (1) and RST (2). Bacterial colonies were also cultured from these samples onto periwinkle wilt media. Eight colonies obtained from these three plants tested PCR positive using the X. fastidiosa-specific primers. The 16S ribosomal and 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (557 nucleotides) (GenBank Accession No. HQ292776) along with the gyrase region (400 nucleotides) (GenBank Accession No. HQ292777) was amplified from the peach total DNA samples and the bacterial colonies. Sequencing analysis of these regions indicate that the X. fastidiosa found in peach is 100% similar to other X. fastidiosa multiplex isolates including isolates from peach, pecan, sycamore, and plum trees and 99% similar to the X. fastidiosa isolates previously found in New Mexico. Further analysis of the 16S ribosomal and 16S-23S rRNA ITS sequences with maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using Paup also groups the peach isolates into the X. fastidiosa multiplex subspecies. The gyrase sequence could not be used to differentiate the peach isolates into a subspecies grouping because of the lack of variability within the sequence. This X. fastidiosa multiplex subspecies could possibly be a threat to the New Mexico pecan industry since pecan infecting X. fastidiosa isolates belong to the same bacterial subspecies. It is not known if X. fastidiosa subspecies multiplex isolates from peach are capable of infecting pecans but they are closely genetically related. It is interesting to note that the isolates from peach are different than previously described X. fastidiosa isolates in New Mexico that were infecting chitalpa and grapes (3). X. fastidiosa has previously been described in peach; the disease is called “phony peach”. The peach trees exhibited stunting and shortened internodes as reported for “phony peach”. They also exhibited slight mottling and branch dieback that may be due to the environment in New Mexico or perhaps they are also exhibiting mineral deficiency symptoms in association with the X. fastidiosa disease. To our knowledge, this is the first report of X. fastidiosa in peach in New Mexico. References: (1) M. H. Francis et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 115:203, 2006. (2) G. V. Minsavage et al. Phytopathology 84:456, 1994. (3) J. J. Randall et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5631, 2009.

Download Full-text

First Report of Neofusicoccum nonquaesitum in Chile Causing Branch Dieback and Decline in Araucaria araucana

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-09-17-1367-pdn ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 102 (7) ◽

pp. 1460-1460 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

S. Pérez ◽

J. Guerrero ◽

R. Galdames

Keyword(s):

First Report ◽

Araucaria Araucana ◽

Branch Dieback

Download Full-text

First Report of Cherry mottle leaf virus Infecting Cherry in China

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-01-14-0058-pdn ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 98 (8) ◽

pp. 1161-1161 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Y. X. Ma ◽

J. J. Li ◽

G. F. Li ◽

S. F. Zhu

Keyword(s):

Capsid Protein ◽

Sweet Cherry ◽

Restriction Site ◽

Protein Gene ◽

Capsid Protein Gene ◽

First Report ◽

Pcr Product ◽

Sweet Cherry Cultivars ◽

Leaf Virus ◽

Cherry Trees

Cherry mottle leaf virus (CMLV) is a member of the genus Trichovirus (family Betaflexiviridae). CMLV infects several species of the genus Prunus including cherry (Prunus avium) and peach (P. persica) (2,3). It is spread via budding and grafting with infected wood and can be transmitted from infected bitter cherry (P. emarginata), or infected but symptomless peach trees to healthy sweet cherry trees by the bud mite (Eriophyes inaequalis) (1). On susceptible sweet cherry cultivars, CMLV causes symptoms such as chlorotic mottle-leaf pattern, distortion, puckering of younger leaves, and small fruits that ripen late (1), which may lead to severe economic losses in some cultivars. Cherry is one of the most important fruit tree species in North China, and Shandong Province is one of the major cherry production areas. In June 2013, a survey of possible CMLV presence was conducted in a cherry orchard planted in 1996 in Zoucheng city, Shandong. The sweet cherry cultivars in this orchard included Black Tartarian, Bing, Hongdeng (a hybrid between cvs. Napoleon and Huangyu), and others; the rootstock cultivar utilized to graft these cultivars was mountain cherry (P. tomentosa). During the survey, characteristic symptoms on leaves such as leaf mottling, distortion, and puckering similar to those caused by CMLV were observed on some trees of the cv. Hongdeng, and the symptomatic trees accounted for ~10% of the total trees of this cultivar. Five symptomatic cherry leaf samples and three healthy-looking cherry leaf samples of cv. Hongdeng were collected. Total RNA extracted from the leaf samples using RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) was subjected to first strand cDNA synthesis with the reverse primer CMLV-3R (5′-CTCGAGAACACAGAGATTTGTCGAGAC-3′, sequence in italics indicates restriction site XhoI) and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The cDNA was then used as template in the PCR assay using primers CMLV-5F (5′-GGATCCATGTCGGCGCGATTGAATC-3′, sequence in italics indicates restriction site BamHI) and CMLV-3R, which amplify the genome fragment including the capsid protein gene of CMLV. The expected PCR product ~590 bp was amplified from all five symptomatic samples, while no such PCR product was amplified from the symptomless samples. The PCR products were cloned into pMD18-T vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Three positive clones for each of the five amplicons were sequenced in both directions. Sequence alignment and nucleotide BLAST analysis of the sequences revealed that they were 99% to 100% identical to the corresponding capsid protein gene sequence of a cherry isolate of CMLV (GenBank Accession No. AF170028) and 85% identical with that of the peach wart strain of CMLV (KC207480). Our results confirm the infection of cherry trees by CMLV in Shandong. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CMLV on cherry in China. As the spread of CMLV by mite vector in the field is rare (1), and no bud mite outbreak had occurred in this orchard in the past years, so it is possible that virus-infected propagation materials are largely responsible for the spread of this virus. Considering the importance of cherry cultivation in China, this report prompts the need to survey the occurrence of this virus in Shandong and other provinces, and the need to develop more effective management strategies such as the use of certified virus-free nursery stocks to reduce the impact of CMLV. References: (1) J. E. Adaskaveg et al. Diseases. Page 61 in: UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Cherry. University of California ANR Publication 3444, 2014. (2) D. James et al. Arch. Virol. 145:995, 2000. (3) T. A. Mekuria et al. Arch. Virol. 158:2201, 2013.

Download Full-text

First Report of Little cherry virus 2 in Flowering and Sweet Cherry Trees in China

Plant Disease ◽

10.1094/pdis-10-10-0766 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 95 (11) ◽

pp. 1484-1484 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

W.-L. Rao ◽

F. Li ◽

R.-J. Zuo ◽

R. Li

Keyword(s):

Sweet Cherry ◽

Sequence Data ◽

Community Gardens ◽

Economic Losses ◽

Helicase Domain ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Viral Origin ◽

First Report ◽

Flowering Cherry ◽

Cherry Trees

Many viruses infect Prunus spp. and cause diseases on them. During a survey of stone fruit trees in 2008 and 2009, flowering cherry (Prunus serrulata) and sweet cherry (P. avium) trees with foliar chlorosis and reddening, stem deformity, and tree stunting were observed in private orchards in Anning and Fumin counties of Yunnan Province. Some sweet cherry trees with severe symptoms yielded small and few fruits and had to be removed. Leaf samples were collected from 68 flowering cherry and 30 sweet cherry trees, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, from private orchards and community gardens in Kunming and counties Anning, Chenggong, Fumin, Jinning, Ludian and Yiliang. Total nucleic acids were extracted with a CTAB extraction method and tested by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay using virus-specific primers. Little cherry virus 2 (LChV-2), Cherry virus A (CVA), Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV), and Prune dwarf virus (PDV) were detected and infection rates were 68.4, 16.3, 9.2, and 7.1%, respectively. Infection of LChV-2 was common in all counties except Ludian where the orchards were healthy. Of 68 infected trees, 29 were found to be infected with LChV-2 and CVA, PDV or PNRSV. LChV-2 was detected in this study by RT-PCR using a pair of novel primers, LCV2-1 (5′-TTCAATATGAGCAGTGTTCCTAAC-3′) and LCV2-4 (5′-ACTCGTCTTGTGACATACCAGTC-3′), in 59 flowering cherry (87%) and 8 sweet cherry (27%) trees, respectively. The primer pair was designed according to alignment of three available LChV-2 sequences (GenBank Nos. NC_005065, AF416335, and AF333237) to amplify the partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene (ORF1b) of 781 bp. The amplicons of selected samples (Anning26 and Yiliang60) were sequenced directly and sequences of 651 bp (GenBank No. HQ412772) were obtained from both samples. Pairwise comparisons and phylogenetic analysis of the sequences show that the two isolates are identical to one another and share 92 to 96% at the amino acid (aa) sequence level to those of other isolates available in the GenBank database. The sequence data confirm that these isolates are a strain of LChV-2 and genetic variation among different strains is relatively high (2). Biological and serological assays are not available for the LChV-2 detection; therefore, the LChV-2 infections of these trees were further confirmed by RT-PCR using primer pair LCV2-5 (5′-TGTTTGTGTCATGTTGTCGGAGAAG-3′) and LCV2-6 (5′-TGAATACCCGAGAACAAGGACTC-3′), which amplified the helicase domain (ORF1a) of ~451 bp. The amplicons from samples Anning26 and Yiliang60 were cloned and sequenced. The 408-bp sequences (excluding primer sequences) were 92 to 98% identical at the aa sequence level to those of other isolates, confirming again their viral origin. LChV-2 (genus Ampelovirus, family Closteroviridae) (4) has been associated with little cherry disease (LChD), a widespread viral disease of sweet and sour cherries (1,3). The virus is transferred between geographic areas mainly by propagated materials. Ornamental and sweet cherries are important crops in China and LChD has the potential to cause significant economic losses. Thus, certified clean stock should be used to establish new orchards. To our knowledge, this is the first report of LChV-2 in cherries in China. References: (1) N. B. Bajet et al. Plant Dis. 92:234, 2008. (2) W. Jelkmann et al. Acta Hortic. 781:321, 2008. (3) B. Komorowska and M. Cieslińska, Plant Dis. 92:1366, 2008. (4) M. E. Rott and W. Jelkmann. Arch. Virol. 150:107, 2005.

Download Full-text