scholarly journals Competitive interaction of three peroxidizing herbicides with the binding of [3H]acifluorfen to corn etioplast membranes

FEBS Letters ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 272 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 106-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rina Varsano ◽  
Michel Matringe ◽  
Noël Magnin ◽  
René Mornet ◽  
René Scalla
2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Cattaneo ◽  
Lucie Fortin

To model the distribution of aquatic mosses, we measured their cover in 33 Quebec streams. The variation in moss cover among streams was explained mostly (42%) by substratum size (percentage >25 cm in diameter). Water pH and depth also explained a significant amount of variation (9 and 10%, respectively). Within a stream, moss cover was again positively correlated to the availability of large substrata and negatively to water depth. There was a strong inverse relationship between covers of moss and of the filamentous cyanobacterium Stigonema, suggesting a competitive interaction. This study confirms previous observations that moss distribution is mainly controlled by substratum size. Chemistry explains part of the among-stream variation. Stigonema-moss competition partly accounts for the patchy distribution within a stream.Key words: aquatic mosses, Fontinalis, streams, Quebec.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 10740
Author(s):  
Khoa Ngoc Duy Nguyen ◽  
Tomi Samuli Nokelainen

Development ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-309
Author(s):  
L. J. Hale

1. A quantitative study of the growth of Clytia johnstoni is described. 2. The distance between hydranths is most commonly between 3 and 4 mm. The average internode lengths and their variability frequently differs not only between colonies but also between stolons of a single colony. The differences are therefore unlikely to be genetic ones. Occasionally much longer internodes occur (up to 8 mm). 3. Hydranths and their stalks differ widely in size but not in morphology. The differences can be caused by the amount of food given. 4. Very vigorous and very poorly growing colonies tend to have slightly longer internodes than the more common colonies of average vigour. 5. Most colonies produce both additional (secondary) hydranths and stolon branches. Hydranth branches grow spaced from existing hydranths; in normal colonies the spacing appears to originate from the hydranth away from the growing tip in an internode. In vigorous growth the hydranth towards the growing stolon tip is the place of reference. 6. Stolon branches occur mostly near to hydranths, either primary or secondary, more especially near to the hydranth farther from the growing tip of the main stolon. 7. There appears to be a limit to the number of branches to an internode. In vigorous growth an optimum of two and a maximum of three is found, either secondary hydranths, or stolons, or both. 8. Stolons vary in their rate of growth. A stolon slowly increases its rate of growth as it gets longer. In a colony of little vigour, the rate is low and variable and may cease and restart; the coenosarc sometimes breaks, dividing the colony. 9. Hydranths take 1–2 days to grow, sometimes 3 days in colonies of little vigour. They remain open for a limited period: normally about 5–7 days; sometimes longer – up to 9 or 10 days; and significantly shorter, 1–3 days, in a colony of little vigour. 10. At the end of their period of existence, hydranths regress. They normally start to regenerate a new hydranth within 1–2 days but some do not do so for longer or very long periods. 11. The whole cycle of hydranth growth, maturity and regression falls into either a 6- to 7-day cycle or a 10- to 11-day cycle. 12. Evidence is presented to support the suggestion that there is a situation of competitive interaction between growth of the various parts of the colony. A priority series for the various parts of the colony is constructed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document