Construction of a prototype-cavern in the decommissioned asse salt-mine in support of research and development efforts in the field of storage of radioactive wastes (in German)

Author(s):  
Hirokazu Tanaka ◽  
Masao Shimizu ◽  
Susumu Tojo ◽  
Ryoji Tanimoto ◽  
Kazuhiko Maekawa ◽  
...  

From 1998 through 2005, the facilities for research and development (R&D) of uranium ore-dressing and uranium fuel etc. were decommissioned and soil contaminated by uranium was collected. All the pieces of apparatus in the nuclear facilities which might be contaminated with uranium were treated as radioactive wastes. At the time of the decommissioning activity, there was no specific value to judge as radioactive wastes. So MMC considered and adopted the pragmatic procedure to judge that soil was radioactive waste or not. During decommissioning facilities and collecting soil, the environmental monitoring was conducted. And it was confirmed that these activities had no influence on the surrounding areas. All decommissioning activities were finished with no difficulty. The wastes generated from the decommissioning activities were packed in the steel containers and have been stored safely in the storehouse built in the same area. In this report, the details of decommissioning activities are described.


2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (12) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Susan Ipri Brown

This article explains why it is important to remove the growing conception that engineering sciences can be treated as a commodity. It highlights that currently, non-engineers are making laws for engineers. These same people evaluate candidate’s statements on the issues and elect officials. An informed electorate—aware of the value of engineering for maintaining the bridges, safety of the cars, etc.—will demand that the public conversation supports and funds these issues. Until engineers’ community gets there, there will be a lack of support for major infrastructure and other long-term projects, budget attacks on funding for and support of research and development programs, and politicians who can ignore scientific facts and still get elected. If engineers’ community gets success in changing the public conversation, more engineers might be encouraged to run for public office. Scientific advisors within the State Department would get public attention and their opinions expressed in front page news articles. However, their efforts will bear only minimal fruit as long as the public conversation stays as it is now.


2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1639) ◽  
pp. 20120274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger N. Beachy

The high rate of return on investments in research and development in agriculture, estimated at between 20- and 40-fold, provides a strong rationale for increasing financial support for such research. Furthermore, the urgency to provide sufficient nutrition for a growing population amid growing demands for an expanding bioeconomy, while facing population growth and changing global weather patterns heightens the urgency to expand research and development in this field. Unfortunately, support by governments for research has increased at a fraction of the rate of increases in support of research for health, energy, etc. Although there have been significant increases in investments by the private sector over the past two decades, much of the foundational research that supports private-sector activities is generated in the public sector. To achieve the greatest benefits of breakthroughs in research, it may be necessary to reconfigure research funding and technology transfer mechanisms in order to more rapidly apply discoveries to local needs as well as to global challenges. Some changes will likely require significant organizational, administrative and operational changes in education and research institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document