scholarly journals The comparison of the expressive power of first-order dynamic logics

1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 197-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Stolboushkin ◽  
M.A. Taitslin
Keyword(s):  
Expressive Power ◽  
First Order ◽  
Dynamic Logics

scholarly journals Constructing weak simulations from linear implications for processes with private names

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1275-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Horne ◽  
Alwen Tiu
Keyword(s):  
Expressive Power ◽  
Dual Pair ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Branching Time ◽  
First Order ◽  
Order Extension

AbstractThis paper clarifies that linear implication defines a branching-time preorder, preserved in all contexts, when used to compare embeddings of process in non-commutative logic. The logic considered is a first-order extension of the proof system BV featuring a de Morgan dual pair of nominal quantifiers, called BV1. An embedding of π-calculus processes as formulae in BV1 is defined, and the soundness of linear implication in BV1 with respect to a notion of weak simulation in the π -calculus is established. A novel contribution of this work is that we generalise the notion of a ‘left proof’ to a class of formulae sufficiently large to compare embeddings of processes, from which simulating execution steps are extracted. We illustrate the expressive power of BV1 by demonstrating that results extend to the internal π -calculus, where privacy of inputs is guaranteed. We also remark that linear implication is strictly finer than any interleaving preorder.

Second-order logic, philosophical issues in

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stewart Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Practice ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Deductive System ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
Mathematical Structures ◽  
First Order ◽  
Correct Reasoning ◽  
Second Order Logic

Typically, a formal language has variables that range over a collection of objects, or domain of discourse. A language is ‘second-order’ if it has, in addition, variables that range over sets, functions, properties or relations on the domain of discourse. A language is third-order if it has variables ranging over sets of sets, or functions on relations, and so on. A language is higher-order if it is at least second-order. Second-order languages enjoy a greater expressive power than first-order languages. For example, a set S of sentences is said to be categorical if any two models satisfying S are isomorphic, that is, have the same structure. There are second-order, categorical characterizations of important mathematical structures, including the natural numbers, the real numbers and Euclidean space. It is a consequence of the Löwenheim–Skolem theorems that there is no first-order categorical characterization of any infinite structure. There are also a number of central mathematical notions, such as finitude, countability, minimal closure and well-foundedness, which can be characterized with formulas of second-order languages, but cannot be characterized in first-order languages. Some philosophers argue that second-order logic is not logic. Properties and relations are too obscure for rigorous foundational study, while sets and functions are in the purview of mathematics, not logic; logic should not have an ontology of its own. Other writers disqualify second-order logic because its consequence relation is not effective – there is no recursively enumerable, sound and complete deductive system for second-order logic. The deeper issues underlying the dispute concern the goals and purposes of logical theory. If a logic is to be a calculus, an effective canon of inference, then second-order logic is beyond the pale. If, on the other hand, one aims to codify a standard to which correct reasoning must adhere, and to characterize the descriptive and communicative abilities of informal mathematical practice, then perhaps there is room for second-order logic.

scholarly journals ON EXISTENTIAL DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN IF LOGIC

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
FAUSTO BARBERO
Keyword(s):  
Expressive Power ◽  
Inference Rules ◽  
Declaration Of Independence ◽  
Truth Values ◽  
First Order ◽  
If Logic ◽  
Knowledge Memory ◽  
Special Classes

AbstractWe analyze the behaviour of declarations of independence between existential quantifiers in quantifier prefixes of Independence-Friendly (IF) sentences; we give a syntactical criterion to decide whether a sentence beginning with such prefix exists, such that its truth values may be affected by removal of the declaration of independence. We extend the result also to equilibrium semantics values for undetermined IF sentences.The main theorem defines a schema of sound and recursive inference rules; we show more explicitly what happens for some simple special classes of sentences.In the last section, we extend the main result beyond the scope of prenex sentences, in order to give a proof of the fact that the fragment of IF sentences with knowledge memory has only first-order expressive power.

Infinitary analogs of theorems from first order model theory

1971 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Malitz
Keyword(s):  
Model Theory ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Direct Products ◽  
Order Model ◽  
Relation Symbol ◽  
First Order ◽  
Identity Symbol

The material presented here belongs to the model theory of the Lκ, λ languages. Our results are either infinitary analogs of important theorems in finitary model theory, or else show that such analogs do not exist.For example, it is well known that whenever i, and , have the same true Lω, ω sentences (i.e., are elementarily equivalent) for i = 1, 2, then the cardinal sums 1 + 2 and + have the same true Lω, ω sentences, and the direct products 1 · 2 and · have the same true Lω, ω sentences [3]. We show that this is true when ‘Lω, ω’ is replaced by ‘Lκ, λ’ if and only if κ is strongly inaccessible. For Lω1, ω this settles a question, posed by Lopez-Escobar [7].In §3 we give a complete description of the expressive power of those sentences of Lκ, λ in which the identity symbol is the only relation symbol which occurs. This extends a result by Hanf [4].

scholarly journals First order quantifiers in monadic second order logic

2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jerome Keisler ◽  
Wafik Boulos Lotfallah
Keyword(s):  
Expressive Power ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
Existential Quantifier ◽  
Reachability Problem ◽  
Open Problems ◽  
First Order ◽  
Second Order Logic ◽  
Monadic Second Order Logic ◽  
Quantifier Alternation

AbstractThis paper studies the expressive power that an extra first order quantifier adds to a fragment of monadic second order logic, extending the toolkit of Janin and Marcinkowski [JM01].We introduce an operation existsn (S) on properties S that says “there are n components having S”. We use this operation to show that under natural strictness conditions, adding a first order quantifier word u to the beginning of a prefix class V increases the expressive power monotonically in u. As a corollary, if the first order quantifiers are not already absorbed in V, then both the quantifier alternation hierarchy and the existential quantifier hierarchy in the positive first order closure of V are strict.We generalize and simplify methods from Marcinkowski [Mar99] to uncover limitations of the expressive power of an additional first order quantifier, and show that for a wide class of properties S, S cannot belong to the positive first order closure of a monadic prefix class W unless it already belongs to W.We introduce another operation alt(S) on properties which has the same relationship with the Circuit Value Problem as reach(S) (defined in [JM01]) has with the Directed Reachability Problem. We use alt(S) to show that Πn ⊈ FO(Σn), Σn ⊈ FO(∆n). and ∆n+1 ⊈ FOB(Σn), solving some open problems raised in [Mat98].

On fixed-point logic with counting

2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 777-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Flum ◽  
Martin Grohe
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Complexity Theory ◽  
Polynomial Time ◽  
Planar Graphs ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Descriptive Complexity ◽  
Main Motivation ◽  
First Order ◽  
Finite Structures ◽  
Tree Width

One of the fundamental results of descriptive complexity theory, due to Immerman [13] and Vardi [18], says that a class of ordered finite structures is definable in fixed-point logic if, and only if, it is computable in polynomial time. Much effort has been spent on the problem of capturing polynomial time, that is, describing all polynomial time computable classes of not necessarily ordered finite structures by a logic in a similar way.The most obvious shortcoming of fixed-point logic itself on unordered structures is that it cannot count. Immerman [14] responded to this by adding counting constructs to fixed-point logic. Although it has been proved by Cai, Fürer, and Immerman [1] that the resulting fixed-point logic with counting, denoted by IFP+C, still does not capture all of polynomial time, it does capture polynomial time on several important classes of structures (on trees, planar graphs, structures of bounded tree-width [15, 9, 10]).The main motivation for such capturing results is that they may give a better understanding of polynomial time. But of course this requires that the logical side is well understood. We hope that our analysis of IFP+C-formulas will help to clarify the expressive power of IFP+C; in particular, we derive a normal form. Moreover, we obtain a problem complete for IFP+C under first-order reductions.

scholarly journals PAGOdA: Pay-As-You-Go Ontology Query Answering Using a Datalog Reasoner

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 309-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujiao Zhou ◽  
Bernardo Cuenca Grau ◽  
Yavor Nenov ◽  
Mark Kaminski ◽  
Ian Horrocks
Keyword(s):  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Query Answering ◽  
Reasoning Task ◽  
First Order ◽  
Ontology Language ◽  
Extensive Evaluation ◽  
Black Boxes ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Existential Quantification

Answering conjunctive queries over ontology-enriched datasets is a core reasoning task for many applications. Query answering is, however, computationally very expensive, which has led to the development of query answering procedures that sacrifice either expressive power of the ontology language, or the completeness of query answers in order to improve scalability. In this paper, we describe a hybrid approach to query answering over OWL 2 ontologies that combines a datalog reasoner with a fully-fledged OWL 2 reasoner in order to provide scalable `pay-as-you-go' performance. The key feature of our approach is that it delegates the bulk of the computation to the datalog reasoner and resorts to expensive OWL 2 reasoning only as necessary to fully answer the query. Furthermore, although our main goal is to efficiently answer queries over OWL 2 ontologies and data, our technical results are very general and our approach is applicable to first-order knowledge representation languages that can be captured by rules allowing for existential quantification and disjunction in the head; our only assumption is the availability of a datalog reasoner and a fully-fledged reasoner for the language of interest, both of which are used as `black boxes'. We have implemented our techniques in the PAGOdA system, which combines the datalog reasoner RDFox and the OWL 2 reasoner HermiT. Our extensive evaluation shows that PAGOdA succeeds in providing scalable pay-as-you-go query answering for a wide range of OWL 2 ontologies, datasets and queries.

scholarly journals Taking Plurals at Face Value

2021 ◽  
pp. 8-30
Author(s):  
Salvatore Florio ◽  
Øystein Linnebo
Keyword(s):  
Philosophy Of Mathematics ◽  
Expressive Power ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Logical System ◽  
Plural Logic ◽  
First Order ◽  
Philosophical Significance ◽  
Pure Logic

Plural logic is a logical system in which plural terms and predicates figure as primitive expressions alongside the singular resources of ordinary first-order logic. The philosophical significance of this system depends on two of its alleged features: being pure logic and providing more expressive power than first-order logic. This chapter first introduces the language and axioms of plural logic and then analyzes this logic’s main philosophical applications in metaphysics, philosophy of mathematics, and semantics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document