Prodynorphin and proenkephalin gene expression in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus of the rat: Sexual differentiation and hormonal regulation

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Simerly
Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (9) ◽  
pp. 3273-3283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Kim ◽  
Kristen P. Tolson ◽  
Sangeeta Dhamija ◽  
Alexander S. Kauffman

Kisspeptin, encoded by Kiss1, stimulates reproduction. In rodents, one Kiss1 population resides in the hypothalamic anterior ventral periventricular nucleus and neighboring rostral periventricular nucleus (AVPV/PeN). AVPV/PeN Kiss1 neurons are sexually dimorphic (greater in females), yet the mechanisms regulating their development and sexual differentiation remain poorly understood. Neonatal estradiol (E2) normally defeminizes AVPV/PeN kisspeptin neurons, but emerging evidence suggests that developmental E2 may also influence feminization of kisspeptin, although exactly when in development this process occurs is unknown. In addition, the obligatory role of GnRH signaling in governing sexual differentiation of Kiss1 or other sexually dimorphic traits remains untested. Here, we assessed whether AVPV/PeN Kiss1 expression is permanently impaired in adult hpg (no GnRH or E2) or C57BL6 mice under different E2 removal or replacement paradigms. We determined that 1) despite lacking GnRH signaling in development, marked sexual differentiation of Kiss1 still occurs in hpg mice; 2) adult hpg females, who lack lifetime GnRH and E2 exposure, have reduced AVPV/PeN Kiss1 expression compared to wild-type females, even after chronic adulthood E2 treatment; 3) E2 exposure to hpg females during the pubertal period does not rescue their submaximal adult Kiss1 levels; and 4) in C57BL6 females, removal of ovarian E2 before the pubertal or juvenile periods does not impair feminization and maximal adult AVPV/PeN Kiss1 expression nor the ability to generate LH surges, indicating that puberty is not a critical period for Kiss1 development. Thus, sexual differentiation still occurs without GnRH, but GnRH or downstream E2 signaling is needed sometime before juvenile development for complete feminization and maximal Kiss1 expression in adult females.


1998 ◽  
Vol 350 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-itsu Ito ◽  
Takejiro Kuzumaki ◽  
Kaoru Otsu ◽  
Yoshihito Iuchi ◽  
Kiichi Ishikawa

1986 ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Counis ◽  
M. Corbani ◽  
A. Starzec ◽  
M. Jutisz

2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1688) ◽  
pp. 20150114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy G. Forger

Circumstantial evidence alone argues that the establishment and maintenance of sex differences in the brain depend on epigenetic modifications of chromatin structure. More direct evidence has recently been obtained from two types of studies: those manipulating a particular epigenetic mechanism, and those examining the genome-wide distribution of specific epigenetic marks. The manipulation of histone acetylation or DNA methylation disrupts the development of several neural sex differences in rodents. Taken together, however, the evidence suggests there is unlikely to be a simple formula for masculine or feminine development of the brain and behaviour; instead, underlying epigenetic mechanisms may vary by brain region or even by dependent variable within a region. Whole-genome studies related to sex differences in the brain have only very recently been reported, but suggest that males and females may use different combinations of epigenetic modifications to control gene expression, even in cases where gene expression does not differ between the sexes. Finally, recent findings are discussed that are likely to direct future studies on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in sexual differentiation of the brain and behaviour.


1985 ◽  
pp. 347-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Loose ◽  
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris ◽  
Herman M. Meisner ◽  
Yaacov Hod ◽  
Richard W. Hanson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document