RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS AND KINETICS OF G2 CHROMATID ABERRATIONS

1991 ◽  
pp. 412
Author(s):  
P.E. BRYANT ◽  
P. SLIJEPCEVIC ◽  
R.A.F. MACLEOD
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromatid Aberrations ◽  
Kinetics Of

scholarly journals PARP1 exhibits enhanced association and catalytic efficiency with γH2A.X-nucleosome

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepti Sharma ◽  
Louis De Falco ◽  
Sivaraman Padavattan ◽  
Chang Rao ◽  
Susana Geifman-Shochat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Catalytic Efficiency ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleosome Core ◽  
Epigenetic Marker ◽  
Kinetics Of

AbstractThe poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, PARP1, plays a key role in maintaining genomic integrity by detecting DNA damage and mediating repair. γH2A.X is the primary histone marker for DNA double-strand breaks and PARP1 localizes to H2A.X-enriched chromatin damage sites, but the basis for this association is not clear. We characterize the kinetics of PARP1 binding to a variety of nucleosomes harbouring DNA double-strand breaks, which reveal that PARP1 associates faster with (γ)H2A.X- versus H2A-nucleosomes, resulting in a higher affinity for the former, which is maximal for γH2A.X-nucleosome that is also the activator eliciting the greatest poly-ADP-ribosylation catalytic efficiency. The enhanced activities with γH2A.X-nucleosome coincide with increased accessibility of the DNA termini resulting from the H2A.X-Ser139 phosphorylation. Indeed, H2A- and (γ)H2A.X-nucleosomes have distinct stability characteristics, which are rationalized by mutational analysis and (γ)H2A.X-nucleosome core crystal structures. This suggests that the γH2A.X epigenetic marker directly facilitates DNA repair by stabilizing PARP1 association and promoting catalysis.

scholarly journals Fanconi Anemia Is Characterized by Delayed Repair Kinetics of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2010 ◽  
Vol 221 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreja Leskovac ◽  
Dragana Vujic ◽  
Marija Guc-Scekic ◽  
Sandra Petrovic ◽  
Ivana Joksic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Delayed Repair ◽  
Kinetics Of

scholarly journals Repair Kinetics of DNA Double Strand Breaks Induced by Simulated Space Radiation

Life ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 341
Author(s):  
Takashi Oizumi ◽  
Rieko Ohno ◽  
Souichiro Yamabe ◽  
Tomoo Funayama ◽  
Asako J. Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ion Irradiation ◽  
Space Radiation ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Carbon Ion ◽  
Kinetics Of

Radiation is unavoidable in space. Energetic particles in space radiation are reported to induce cluster DNA damage that is difficult to repair. In this study, normal human fibroblasts were irradiated with components of space radiation such as proton, helium, or carbon ion beams. Immunostaining for γ-H2AX and 53BP1 was performed over time to evaluate the kinetics of DNA damage repair. Our data clearly show that the repair kinetics of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by carbon ion irradiation, which has a high linear energy transfer (LET), are significantly slower than those of proton and helium ion irradiation. Mixed irradiation with carbon ions, followed by helium ions, did not have an additive effect on the DSB repair kinetics. Interestingly, the mean γ-H2AX focus size was shown to increase with LET, suggesting that the delay in repair kinetics was due to damage that is more complex. Further, the 53BP1 focus size also increased in an LET-dependent manner. Repair of DSBs, characterized by large 53BP1 foci, was a slow process within the biphasic kinetics of DSB repair, suggesting non-homologous end joining with error-prone end resection. Our data suggest that the biological effects of space radiation may be significantly influenced by the dose as well as the type of radiation exposure.

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixi Xu ◽  
Dongyi Xu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Region ◽  
Gene Repair ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document