scholarly journals Infective endocarditis in cardiac implantable electronic devices (pacemakers): Experience of the rhythmology department in Mohammed V military instruction hospital

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-84
Author(s):  
Z. Laraichi ◽  
M. Bennani ◽  
J. Kheyi ◽  
H. Bouzelmat ◽  
A. Chaib
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

scholarly journals Lead-Related Infective Endocarditis in Latvia: A Single Centre Experience

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Nesterovics ◽  
Nesterovics ◽  
Stradins ◽  
Kalejs ◽  
Ansabergs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Lead Extraction ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Common Location

Background and Objectives: Over the last five decades cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have become established as the mainstay for the treatment of permanent bradycardias, chronic heart failure and dangerous heart rhythm disturbances. These devices improve survival and quality of life in many patients. However, infections associated with CIED implantation, particularly lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE), can offset all benefits and make more harm than good for the patient. To date, there are no other studies in Latvia, addressing patients with lead-related infective endocarditis. The objective of this study was to identify the most common pathogens associated with LRIE and their antimicrobial resistance and to identify possible risk factors of patients who present with LRIE. Materials and Methods: The study was performed retrospectively at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital (PSCUH). The study included patients who were referred to PSCUH due to LRIE for lead extraction. Patients were identified from procedural journals. Information about isolated microorganisms, patient comorbidities and visual diagnostics data was taken from patient records. Results: Forty-nine patients with CIED related infective endocarditis were included in the study, 34 (69.4%) were male, median age of all patients was 65.0 (50.5–73.0) years, median hospital stay was 15.5 (22.0–30.5) days. Successful and complete lead extraction was achieved in all patients. Thirty-two (65.3%) had received antibiotics prior to blood sample. Only in 31 (63.3%) positive culture results were seen. The most common isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (23.5%) and coagulase negative staphylococci (23.5%). Other bacteria were isolated considerably less often. The atrial lead was most common location for lead vegetations, seen in 50.0% of cases. Five (10.2%) patients have died due to the disease. Conclusions: Lead-related infective endocarditis is a major complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices with considerable morbidity and mortality, which in our study was as high as 10.2%.

scholarly journals Cardiovascular Imaging in Infective Endocarditis

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Horgan ◽  
Anuj Mediratta ◽  
Linda D. Gillam
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Prosthetic Valve ◽  
Multimodality Imaging ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Device Infection

Multimodality imaging plays a pivotal role in the evaluation and management of infective endocarditis (IE)—a condition with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of IE is primarily based on the modified Duke criteria with echocardiography as the first-line imaging modality. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography delineate vegetation location and size, assess for paravalvular extension of infection, and have the added advantage of defining the hemodynamic effects of valvular or device infection. Native and prosthetic valve IE, infections relating to cardiac implantable electronic devices, and indwelling catheters are effectively evaluated with echocardiography. However, complementary imaging is occasionally required when there remains diagnostic uncertainty following transesophageal echocardiography. Multidetector computed tomography and nuclear imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography and white blood cell scintigraphy have been shown to reduce the rate of misdiagnosed IE particularly in the setting of prosthetic valve endocarditis, paravalvular extension of infection, and cardiac implantable electronic devices. In this review, we describe a modern approach to cardiac imaging in native and prosthetic valve endocarditis, as well as cardiac implantable electronic devices including pacing devices and left ventricular assist devices. Current guidelines addressing the role of multimodality imaging in IE are discussed. The utility of imaging in the assessment of local and distant endocarditis complications such as pericardial sequelae, myocarditis, and embolic events is also addressed.

Infective endocarditis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a nationwide study

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1062-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Mateos Gaitán ◽  
Lucía Boix-Palop ◽  
Patricia Muñoz García ◽  
Carlos A Mestres ◽  
Mercedes Marín Arriaza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Neurological Involvement ◽  
P Values ◽  
Nationwide Study ◽  
Hospital Survival ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Abstract Aims Patients with infective endocarditis (IE) frequently have cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Here, we aim to define the clinical profile and prognostic factors of IE in these patients. Methods and results Infective endocarditis cases were prospectively identified in the Spanish National Endocarditis Registry. From 3996 IE, 708 (17.7%) had a CIED and 424 CIED-related IE (lead vegetation). Patients with a CIED were older (68 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 8 years); had more comorbidities {pulmonary disease [176 (24.8%) vs. 545 (16.7%)], renal disease [239 (33.8%) vs. 740 (22.7%)], diabetes [248 (35.0%) vs. 867 (26.6%)], and heart failure [348 (49.2%) vs. 978 (29.9%)]}; and fewer complications {intracardiac destruction [106 (15%) vs. 1077 (33.1%)], heart failure [215 (30.3%) vs. 1340 (41.1%)], embolism [107 (15.1%) vs. 714 (21.9%)], and neurological involvement [77 (10.8%) vs. 702 (21.5%)]} (all P-values <0.001) in comparison to subjects without a CIED. In-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without CIED [171 (24.2%) vs. 881 (27.0%), P = 0.82]. In subjects with a CIED, CIED-related IE was independently associated with in-hospital survival: odds ratio (OR) 0.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3–0.7, P = 0.001]. Surgery was independently associated with in-hospital survival in CIED-related IE: OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.7, P = 0.004); but not in subjects with valve IE and no CIED lead involvement: OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.5–1.7, P = 0.77). Conclusion Over a sixth of IE patients have a CIED. This group of patients is older, with more comorbidities and fewer IE-related complications in comparison to subjects without a CIED. In-hospital mortality was similar in patients with and without a CIED.

Recent Advances in Pacing and Defibrillation

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Kathy L Lee ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Implantable Defibrillators ◽  
Cardiac Pacemakers ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Treatment And Prevention ◽  
Recent Advances ◽  
Pacing Lead ◽  
Leadless Pacing ◽  
Device Complications

Cardiac pacemakers have been the standard therapy for patients with bradyarrhythmias for several decades. The pacing lead is an integral part of the system, serving as a conduit for the delivery of energy pulses to stimulate the myocardium. However, it is also the Achilles’ heel of pacemakers, being the direct cause of most device complications both acutely during implant and chronically years afterwards. Leadless pacing with ultrasound-mediated energy has been demonstrated in animals and humans to be safe and feasible in acute studies. Implantable defibrillators revolutionised the treatment and prevention of sudden cardiac death. Subcutaneous implantable defibrillators have been under development for more than 10 years. A permanent implantable system has been shown to be feasible in treating induced and spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias. These developments and recent advances in pacing and defibrillation will arouse further interest in the research and development of leadless cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document