Community variation in adolescent cannabis use in Australia and the Netherlands

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 204-209
Author(s):  
B. Rowland ◽  
H. Jonkman ◽  
J. Williams ◽  
P. Kremer ◽  
J.W. Toumbourou
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marije Wouters ◽  
A. Benschop ◽  
M. van Laar ◽  
D.J. Korf
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Simons-Morton ◽  
William Pickett ◽  
Will Boyce ◽  
Tom F.M. ter Bogt ◽  
Wilma Vollebergh

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marije Wouters ◽  
Annemieke Benschop ◽  
Margriet van Laar ◽  
Dirk J. Korf

The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of coffee shop availability on the prevalence and intensity of cannabis use, as well as the effectiveness of the ‘separation of markets’ policy. A convenience sample of nightlife visitors and a sub-selection of previous year cannabis users were used for analyses on cannabis and hard drugs use. Logistic regression analyses showed that coffee shop proximity does not seem to be linked to prevalence of cannabis use or intensity of use. In addition, proximity of coffee shops does not seem to be linked directly to hard drugs use.


Author(s):  
Kirsten J. M. van Hooijdonk ◽  
Milagros Rubio ◽  
Sterre S. H. Simons ◽  
Tirza H. J. van Noorden ◽  
Maartje Luijten ◽  
...  

Tobacco, alcohol and cannabis are commonly used among university students. However, student lives and their substance use have changed dramatically since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on (trends in) weekly smoking, weekly binge drinking and weekly cannabis use in Dutch university students and investigated associated student-, study- and COVID-19-related characteristics. Between April and June 2020, several Dutch higher educational institutes invited their students to participate in an online survey. Data of 9967 students (Mage = 22.0 (SD = 2.6); Nfemale = 7008 (70.3%)) were available for analyses. Overall, weekly smoking remained stable (±11.5%), weekly binge drinking decreased (from 27.8% to 13.9%) and weekly cannabis use increased (from 6.7% to 8.6%). Male gender, not living with parents, being a bachelor student, having less financial resources and less adherence to the COVID-19 measures were found to increase the risk of substance use (before/during the first COVID-19 lockdown). Additionally, male gender, not living with parents, being a bachelor student, not being born in the Netherlands and having a student loan contributed to the likelihood of increased substance use during COVID-19. Patterns of characteristics contributing to the likelihood of decreased weekly substance use during COVID-19 were less clear. The risk factors male gender, not living with parents and being a bachelor student do not only contribute to the likelihood of using substances but also contribute to the likelihood of increased use during a lockdown. Prevention and intervention programs should especially target these risk groups.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jonkman ◽  
M. Steketee ◽  
J. W. Tombourou ◽  
K. Cini ◽  
J. Williams

Author(s):  
Dylan Richards ◽  
Frank Schwebel ◽  
Adrian Bravo ◽  
Matthew Pearson ◽  
Cross-Cultural Addictions Study Team

Cannabis-related protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are behaviors used before, during, and/or after using cannabis to reduce its associated harms. Despite the effectiveness of PBS in reducing both cannabis use and negative cannabis-related consequences, few studies have examined whether there are sex and cultural differences in PBS use. In the present study, we compare PBS use across males and females and across five countries. We also examine whether the associations of PBS use with cannabis-related outcomes differ by sex and country. We recruited 1,175 college students (63.3% female; Mage = 20.96, SD = 3.95; 45.1% Freshman, 20.2% Sophomore, 16.6% Junior, 9.7% Senior, 8.4% other) who reported past-month cannabis use from eight universities in five countries (U.S., Spain, Argentina, Uruguay, and the Netherlands) to complete an online survey. The online survey included the Marijuana Use Grid (MUG; Pearson & Marijuana Outcomes Study Team, 2020), Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana scale (PBSM; Pedersen et al., 2016; revised by Pedersen et al., 2017), and Brief-Marijuana Consequences Questionnaire (B-MACQ; Simons et al., 2012). Results of a series of ANOVAs suggested differences across countries on the PBSM total score, F(4, 1,126) = 20.93, p < .001, such that participants in the U.S. (M = 4.53, SD = 1.11) and Spain (M = 4.48, SD = 0.95) endorsed the most frequent PBS use and participants in the Netherlands (M = 3.46, SD = 1.49) endorsed the least frequent PBS use. There were many item-level differences in PBS use across countries with a pattern similar to that for the PBSM total score. Results of a series of independent sample t-tests suggested that females (M = 4.51, SD = 1.11) scored higher than males (M = 4.17, SD =1.09) on the PBSM total score, t(1,123) = -4.88, p < .001, as well as nearly every item. The correlations between PBSM total score and cannabis-related outcomes across gender and countries were mostly in the expected direction: more frequent PBS use was associated with less cannabis use and fewer cannabis-related consequences. These correlations were largest for the U.S. sample. Interestingly, however, the correlation between the PBSM total score and B-MACQ was positive for the Argentina sample and every correlation between the PBSM total score and cannabis-related outcome was positive for the Netherlands sample. The results of the present study suggest there are several gender and cultural differences in the use of cannabis-related PBS. However, future studies are needed to replicate these findings, especially given the relatively small samples for some of the countries in the present study (our smallest sample size was for Uruguay [n = 46]). Gender and cultural differences in PBS use should be considered in developing and tailoring PBS interventions, especially because the PBSM was validated with a U.S. sample and most existing interventions were developed for use with U.S. participants.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margriet W. van Laar ◽  
Pieter E. Oomen ◽  
Charlotte J. A. van Miltenburg ◽  
Eefje Vercoulen ◽  
Tom P. Freeman ◽  
...  

The lockdown measures implemented to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2 may affect (illicit) drug consumption patterns. This rapid response study investigated changes in cannabis use in a non-probability sample of cannabis users in the Netherlands during the early lockdown period. We fielded an online cross-sectional survey 4–6 weeks after implementation of lockdown measures in the Netherlands on March 15, 2020. We measured self-reported \motives for changes in use, and assessed cannabis use frequency (use days), number of joints per typical use day, and route of administration in the periods before and after lockdown implementation. 1,563 cannabis users were recruited. Mean age was 32.7 ± 12.0 years; 66.3% were male and 67.9% used cannabis (almost) daily. In total, 41.3% of all respondents indicated that they had increased their cannabis use since the lockdown measures, 49.4% used as often as before, 6.6% used less often, and 2.8% stopped (temporarily). One-third of those who were not daily users before the lockdown became (almost) daily users. Before the lockdown, most respondents (91.4%) used cannabis in a joint mixed with tobacco and 87.6% still did so. Among users of joints, 39.4% reported an increase in the average number consumed per use day; 54.2% stayed the same and 6.4% used fewer joints. This rapid response study found evidence that during the lockdown more users increased rather than decreased cannabis consumption according to both frequency and quantity. These data highlight the need to invest more resources in supporting cessation, harm reduction, and monitoring longer term trends in cannabis use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document