A modified strain-controlled reference stress approach for submarine pipelines under large-scale plastic strain

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 12-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxin Zhao ◽  
Lianyong Xu ◽  
Hongyang Jing ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Jiangzhong Huang
Author(s):  
Bruno Michel ◽  
Jean-Philippe Sermage ◽  
Philippe Gilles ◽  
Bruno Barthelet ◽  
Patrick Le Delliou

The RSE-M Code [1] provides rules and requirements for in-service inspection of French Pressurized Water Reactor power plant components. Non mandatory guidance is given in the Code for analytical flaw evaluation in a wide range of situations. In Appendix 5.4 of the Code, influence coefficients are provided to calculate stress intensity factors in pipes and shells containing semi-elliptical surface defects. The J assessment method is based on the reference stress concept with two options for reference loads evaluation: “CEP elastic plastic stress” and “CLC modified limit load”. In this paper recent advances concerning J assessment under mechanical loading for a crack located in a pipe-elbow junction are presented. Reference stress evaluation with “CLC” option is developed and mechanical foundations of the equation of large scale yielding under complex loading (pressure, in-plane and out-of-plane bending) are presented.


Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo

Abstract Fitness for service rules and a calculation method for ductile crack growth under large scale plastic cyclic loading have not been established even for Mode I. In a paper presented at the PVP2018 conference the authors presented methods to establish how to determine the parameters of the combined hardening plasticity rule and applied it to simulate the ductile crack growth behavior of 1TCT specimens of the different load levels. Also, ΔJ calculations using the reference stress method, and a ΔJ-basis fatigue crack growth rate derived from that on ΔK-basis according to JSME rules for FFS were applied to estimate the crack growth under cyclic loading in excess of yield. Since in the 2018 paper identified some gaps were found between experiments and the predicted crack growth behavior, several equations of the reference stress method are evaluated in the present paper. Additionally, the prediction procedure using the ΔJ calculation by the reference stress method and the da/dN−ΔJ curve based on the JSME rules for FFS are applied to pipe fracture tests under cyclic loading. Their applicability is discussed for the case of an example piping system.


1974 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Fairbairn

Reference-stress parameters, based on the Norton constitutive equation, are developed for creep bending of circular and elliptical tubes. The parameters are presented in the form of a design chart. The reference stress methods apply also to other simple constitutive equations of the power law, exponential and hyperbolic sine forms, and also to two complex equations describing creep behaviour over the entire range from primary to tertiary. In these equations the functions of stress and time are not separable and reference stress techniques provide a convenient method of evaluating stationary stress distributions and investigating the variation of these stresses with time. Aluminium alloy tubes were creep tested with cyclic uniform bending moments. Creep strains to fracture were measured by an end-rotation method. The creep behaviour of the tubes was well predicted by reference-stress cyclic tensile creep tests.


Author(s):  
T. Sriskandarajah ◽  
Daowu Zhou ◽  
Lingjun Cao

There is a concern on the fracture integrity of the partially over-matching or under-matching weld during reel-lay installation where there is large plastic strain in the pipe. Conventional ECA procedures such as BS7910 and DNV-OS-F101 are applicable for fully over-matching welds only, due to limitations in the reference stress solution (or limit load solutions). The ECA procedure based on 3D finite element (FE) analysis was developed for partially over-matching welds or under-matching. The methodology has been successfully applied to several projects of industry-wide significance, with partially over-matching welds in offshore pipelines. This paper provides a case study validating the crack growth from FE based ECA methodology against the large scale bending trial test where the pipe containing the notched defect was pre-strained under a series of straining cycles. A comparison of the crack growth between 3D FEA and the large scale bending test was presented.


Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Ishikawa ◽  
Shigeru Endo ◽  
Alan Glover ◽  
David Horsley ◽  
Masao Toyoda

Recent developments in the manufacturing process of steel plate for high strength linepipe have enabled superior toughness to prevent brittle fracture of the pipe body. Techniques for non-destructive inspection have also improved, and large flaws that could lead to brittle fracture are highly unlikely in recent high strength pipelines. However, large amounts of plastic deformation can be expected in seismic or permafrost regions. Prevention of ductile fracture of the pipe body or weldment therefore becomes a key issue in defining the tensile strain limit. Ductile fracture is considered to occur by growth and coalescence of voids, and is affected by stress triaxiality and plastic straining at the cracked region. Although many studies have been carried out to evaluate ductile cracking criteria, its transferability to large-scale fracture behavior has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, ductile cracking of high strength linepipe steels, Grade X80 and X100, was investigated. Notched round bar specimens with different notch root radii were tested to determine the precise conditions for initiation of ductile fracture. Stress and strain conditions at the notch regions were evaluated by FE analysis, and the “critical equivalent plastic strain” was defined at conditions corresponding to ductile fracture initiation in the experimental small specimen tests. Ductile crack initiation behavior was also determined for wide plate test specimens by making close observations of the notch root area. 3-D FE analysis of the wide plate tensile test showed that the equivalent plastic strain at the point of ductile fracture initiation was in close agreement with that in the notched round bas specimen. Thus, the “critical equivalent plastic strain,” determined by small notched round bar specimens, can be considered as a transferable criterion to predict large-scale fracture behavior in wide plate tests. Concepts of strain based design in terms of preventing ductile failure from a surface flaw by applying critical strain to cracking were also discussed in this paper. Results were compared to conventional grade linepipe steels and structural steels, showing that recent high strength linepipe steels have higher resistance to ductile cracking than conventional structural steels. In addition, 3-D FE analyses were used in a parametric study to determine the effects of Y/T and uniform strain on the onset of ductile cracking behaviour. The results of these analyses show the relative importance of materials properties on the resistance to ductile cracking.


Author(s):  
Şefika Elvin Eren ◽  
Tyler London ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Isabel Hadley

The British Standard, BS 7910 Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures is currently under revision [1]. Major changes have been undertaken, especially in the fracture assessment routes, and this paper specifically addresses the assessment of proximity to plastic collapse, usually expressed as the parameter Lr via either a reference stress or limit load approach. In the new edition of BS 7910, the reference stress approach has been retained for the assessment of many geometries, mainly for reasons of continuity. However, new limit load solutions (originating in the R6 procedure) are given for use in the assessments of strength mismatched structures or clad plates. In general, a reference stress solution and a limit load solution for the same geometry should deliver the same value of Lr. However, recent comparative studies have shown differences in the assessment of plastic collapse depending on whether the reference stress solutions in BS 7910:2013 or the limit load solutions in R6 are used for the calculation of Lr. In this paper, the extent of the difference in the assessment results with respect to the choice of solutions and boundary conditions are discussed. The results of the assessments in accordance with BS 7910 and R6 are compared with the results of numerical assessments obtained via Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The collapse loads observed in various wide plate tests conducted in the last 20 years are also compared with the collapse loads predicted by BS 910:2013, R6 and FEA. Finally, observations regarding the accuracy of different Codes and FEA are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document