scholarly journals Gross primary productivity of Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado) estimated by different remote sensing-based models

2021 ◽  
Vol 307 ◽  
pp. 108456
Author(s):  
Marcelo Sacardi Biudes ◽  
George Louis Vourlitis ◽  
Maísa Caldas Souza Velasque ◽  
Nadja Gomes Machado ◽  
Victor Hugo de Morais Danelichen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulisse Gomarasca ◽  
Gregory Duveiller ◽  
Alessandro Cescatti ◽  
Georg Wohlfahrt

<p>Accurate estimation of terrestrial gross primary productivity is essential for the development of credible future carbon cycle and climate simulations. Current remote sensing techniques allow retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) as a valid proxy for GPP, but low resolution, sparse coverage, or resolution mismatches between the different satellite sensors hinder our ability to effectively link SIF to many environmental variables at fine scales. In order to better characterize heterogeneous landscapes, several attempts to downscale SIF products to higher resolutions have been made. We investigate the ability of the downscaled GOME-2 product developed by Duveiller et al. (2019), to capture the differences in spatiotemporal dynamics over the Greater Alpine Space. We analyse SIF in connection to land cover and elevation, and calculate land phenology metrics based on seasonal SIF time series. Ground-based GPP validation suggests biome-specific SIF-GPP relationships, but the comparison was hindered by the resolution mismatch of the data. Moreover, missing data are present at high elevations, diminishing the suitability of current SIF products to analyse cloud-prone mountainous areas. Important insights into spatial patterns and seasonal trends could be inferred at forest and other large-area land cover types, typical of mid elevations in the Alps, but many anthropogenic habitats at low elevations, as well as high elevation grasslands and other small-scale heterogeneous environments could not be thoroughly investigated and are likely to be underrepresented or prone to biases. Similar downscaling procedures might be applied at finer scales to e.g. TROPOMI products, or alternative advanced remote sensing SIF techniques and instruments might be needed in order to enable detailed and systematic evaluations of the Alpine region or similar highly heterogenous landscapes, before a process-oriented monitoring and unbiased implementation into climate models may be performed.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2185-2200 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Verma ◽  
M. A. Friedl ◽  
A. D. Richardson ◽  
G. Kiely ◽  
A. Cescatti ◽  
...  

Abstract. Gross primary productivity (GPP) is the largest and most variable component of the global terrestrial carbon cycle. Repeatable and accurate monitoring of terrestrial GPP is therefore critical for quantifying dynamics in regional-to-global carbon budgets. Remote sensing provides high frequency observations of terrestrial ecosystems and is widely used to monitor and model spatiotemporal variability in ecosystem properties and processes that affect terrestrial GPP. We used data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and FLUXNET to assess how well four metrics derived from remotely sensed vegetation indices (hereafter referred to as proxies) and six remote sensing-based models capture spatial and temporal variations in annual GPP. Specifically, we used the FLUXNET La Thuile data set, which includes several times more sites (144) and site years (422) than previous studies have used. Our results show that remotely sensed proxies and modeled GPP are able to capture significant spatial variation in mean annual GPP in every biome except croplands, but that the percentage of explained variance differed substantially across biomes (10–80%). The ability of remotely sensed proxies and models to explain interannual variability in GPP was even more limited. Remotely sensed proxies explained 40–60% of interannual variance in annual GPP in moisture-limited biomes, including grasslands and shrublands. However, none of the models or remotely sensed proxies explained statistically significant amounts of interannual variation in GPP in croplands, evergreen needleleaf forests, or deciduous broadleaf forests. Robust and repeatable characterization of spatiotemporal variability in carbon budgets is critically important and the carbon cycle science community is increasingly relying on remotely sensing data. Our analyses highlight the power of remote sensing-based models, but also provide bounds on the uncertainties associated with these models. Uncertainty in flux tower GPP, and difference between the footprints of MODIS pixels and flux tower measurements are acknowledged as unresolved challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document