Determine the Effectiveness of a Pharmacist Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on C.difficile Infections in Skilled Nursing Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. S19
Author(s):  
Christian Cheatham ◽  
Monica Leriger ◽  
Jose Pinon ◽  
Matthew F. Wack
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Stewardship Program

scholarly journals 2045. GAIN (Generating Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiatives in Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities) Collaborative Survey Results: CDC Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship Compliance Assessment in 27 Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S687-S688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy P Hanson ◽  
Massimo Pacilli ◽  
Shannon N Xydis ◽  
Kelly Walblay ◽  
Stephanie R Black
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Director Of Nursing ◽  
Minimum Criteria

Abstract Background Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in long-term care facilities is a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirement as of 2017. The CDC recommends that ASPs in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) fulfill 7 Core Elements: leadership commitment, accountability, drug expertise, action, tracking, reporting and education. Methods An electronic survey utilizing REDCap was sent to the 76 Chicago SNFs representatives (Administrator, Director of Nursing, and/or Assistant Director of Nursing). Survey questions were adopted from the CDC Core Elements of Antimicrobial Stewardship for Nursing Homes Checklist. Results Twenty-seven (36%) of Chicago SNFs responded. Bed size ranged from 36 – 307 (median 150). Although 93% of facilities had a written statement of leadership support for antimicrobial stewardship, only 22% cited any budgeted financial support for antimicrobial stewardship activities. While Pharmacist Consultants visited all SNFs (most visiting monthly), only 33% of SNFs had an Infectious Disease Provider that consulted on-site. Dedicated time for antimicrobial stewardship activities was less than 10 hours per week in 78% of facilities, with half of all respondents reporting less than 5 hours per week. Treatment guidelines were in place for 63% of SNFs, 56% had an antibiogram, and only 7% utilized the Loeb criteria to guide appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Many facilities tracked antimicrobial stewardship metrics (93%) and reported out to staff (70%). Annual nursing training on antimicrobial stewardship occurs more frequently (85%) than prescriber education (56%). The top 3 barriers identified in implementing ASPs were financial limitations (33%), lack of clinical expertise (33%), and provider opposition (30%). Facilities’ compliance in all seven core elements varied from partially compliant (65%), majority compliant (19%), and majority non-compliant (16%). Conclusion Data from this baseline survey informed focused antimicrobial stewardship initiatives for the GAIN Collaborative. Targeted areas to incorporate into facility action plans include treatment guideline development, antibiograms, annual staff antimicrobial stewardship education, and adoption of the Loeb minimum criteria for antibiotic prescribing into clinical practice. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Opportunities for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Skilled Nursing Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. B29
Author(s):  
Stephanie Biedny ◽  
S. Biedny ◽  
K. Imam ◽  
K. Hyde ◽  
S. Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Skilled Nursing

scholarly journals 2047. GAIN (Generating Antimicrobial Stewardship Initiatives in Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities) Collaborative: Cumulative Results of Point Prevalence Surveys Assessing Antibiotic Appropriateness in Four Chicago Skilled Nursing Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S689-S690
Author(s):  
Amy P Hanson ◽  
Massimo Pacilli ◽  
Shannon N Xydis ◽  
Kelly Walblay ◽  
Stephanie R Black
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Minimum Criteria

Abstract Background Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) in long-term care facilities are a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirement as of 2017. The CDC estimates 40–75% of antibiotic prescribing in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is inappropriate. Overuse of antibiotics can cause harm by increasing the risk of adverse drug events (including C. difficile infections) and antimicrobial resistance. Methods The GAIN Collaborative was launched to assist SNFs in improving antibiotic prescribing. A list of antibiotics prescribed was generated from the electronic health records, and a chart review was performed. Results Antibiotic orders from September 2018 to March 2019 were randomly selected at 4 SNFs, and 120 antibiotic courses were reviewed (23, 40, 25, and 32 at SNFs A-D). Bed size ranged from 72 to 156 (median 88). Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing ranged from 60 to 78% (median 71%) among facilities. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were the most frequent indication (40%), followed by lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), accounting for 26% and 19% of indications, respectively. Inappropriate prescribing rates by indication were 90% for UTIs, 78% for SSTIs, and 47% for LRTIs. The most common reasons for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were: insufficient signs and symptoms based on the Loeb minimum criteria for starting antibiotics (43%), inappropriate agent selection (30%), and lengthy treatment durations (29%). The majority of antibiotics prescribed were β-lactams (42%) or fluoroquinolones (29%). The median antibiotic prescription duration for non-catheter-associated UTIs was 5 days, LRTIs was 7 days, catheter-associated UTIs was 10 days, prophylaxis was 10 days, and SSTIs was 13 days. Conclusion Inappropriate antibiotic use was common in the four Chicago SNFs assessed. Results were presented at each facility’s Quality Assurance meeting to deliver provider-focused feedback. Additionally, provider and nursing education has been conducted at the four SNFs aimed at reducing unnecessary treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Any improvements in antibiotic use will be captured through repeat point prevalence surveys post-implementation of a UTI SBAR communication tool and common infection treatment guidelines. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sustainability Failure in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Secondary Care Hospital from Cuba: A Historical Review of 30 Years and 3 Shots

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humberto Guanche Garcell ◽  
Juan José Pisonero Socias ◽  
Gilberto Pardo Gómez
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Historical Review ◽  
Original Data ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Continuous Quality ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
History Of ◽  
Health Organization

Background: During the last 30 years an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) was implemented in a facility with periods of weakness. We aim to describe the history of the sustainability failure in the local ASP. Methods: A historical review was conducted using original data from the facility library and papers published. An analysis of factors related to the failure was conducted based on the Doyle approach. Results: The first ASP was implemented from 1989 to 1996 based on the international experiences and contributes to the improvement in the quality of prescription, reduction of 52% in cost and in the incidence of nosocomial infection. The second program restarts in 2008 and decline in 2015, while the third program was guided by the Pan-American Health Organization from 2019. This program, in progress, is more comprehensive than previous ones and introduced as a novel measure the monitoring of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. The factors related to the sustainability were considered including the availability of antimicrobials, the leader´s support, safety culture, and infrastructure. Conclusions: The history behind thirty years of experiences in antimicrobial stewardship programs has allowed us to identify the gaps that require proactive strategies and actions to achieve sustainability and continuous quality improvement.

Rehabilitation Intensity and Patient Outcomes in Skilled Nursing Facilities in the United States: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A Prusynski ◽  
Allison M Gustavson ◽  
Siddhi R Shrivastav ◽  
Tracy M Mroz
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Objective Exponential increases in rehabilitation intensity in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) motivated recent changes in Medicare reimbursement policies, which remove financial incentives for providing more minutes of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. Yet there is concern that SNFs will reduce therapy provision and patients will experience worse outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize current evidence on the relationship between therapy intensity and patient outcomes in SNFs. Methods PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, and COCHRANE databases were searched. English-language studies published in the United States between 1998 and February 14, 2020, examining the relationship between therapy intensity and community discharge, hospital readmission, length of stay (LOS), and functional improvement for short-stay SNF patients were considered. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Classification of Evidence scale for causation questions. AAN criteria were used to assess confidence in the evidence for each outcome. Results Eight observational studies met inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence that higher intensity therapy was associated with higher rates of community discharge and shorter LOS. One study provided very low-level evidence of associations between higher intensity therapy and lower hospital readmissions after total hip and knee replacement. There was low-level evidence indicating higher intensity therapy is associated with improvements in function. Conclusions This systematic review concludes, with moderate confidence, that higher intensity therapy in SNFs leads to higher community discharge rates and shorter LOS. Future research should improve quality of evidence on functional improvement and hospital readmissions. Impact This systematic review demonstrates that patients in SNFs may benefit from higher intensity therapy. Because new policies no longer incentivize intensive therapy, patient outcomes should be closely monitored to ensure patients in SNFs receive high-quality care.

scholarly journals Carbapenemase-Producing, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Summary of CDC Consultations, 2017–2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s151-s152
Author(s):  
Lauren Epstein ◽  
Alicia Shugart ◽  
David Ham ◽  
Snigdha Vallabhaneni ◽  
Richard Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facilities ◽  
Nursing Facilities ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Single Facility

Background: Carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CP-CRAB) are a public health threat due to potential for widespread dissemination and limited treatment options. We describe CDC consultations for CP-CRAB to better understand transmission and identify prevention opportunities. Methods: We defined CP-CRAB as CRAB isolates with a molecular test detecting KPC, NDM, VIM, or IMP carbapenemases or a plasmid-mediated oxacillinase (OXA-23, OXA-24/40, OXA-48, OXA-58, OXA-235/237). We reviewed the CDC database of CP-CRAB consultations with health departments from January 1, 2017, through June 1, 2019. Consultations were grouped into 3 categories: multifacility clusters, single-facility clusters, and single cases. We reviewed the size, setting, environmental culturing results, and identified infection control gaps for each consultation. Results: We identified 29 consultations involving 294 patients across 19 states. Among 9 multifacility clusters, the median number of patients was 12 (range, 2–87) and the median number of facilities was 2 (range, 2–6). Among 9 single-facility clusters, the median number of patients was 5 (range, 2–50). The most common carbapenemase was OXA-23 (Table 1). Moreover, 16 consultations involved short-stay acute-care hospitals, and 6 clusters involved ICUs and/or burn units. Also, 8 consultations involved skilled nursing facilities. Environmental sampling was performed in 3 consultations; CP-CRAB was recovered from surfaces of portable, shared equipment (3 consultations), inside patient rooms (3 consultations) and nursing stations (2 consultations). Lapses in environmental cleaning and interfacility communication were common across consultations. Among 11 consultations for single CP-CRAB cases, contact screening was performed in 7 consultations and no additional CP-CRAB was identified. All 4 patients with NDM-producing CRAB reported recent international travel. Conclusions: Consultations for clusters of oxacillinase-producing CP-CRAB were most often requested in hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. Healthcare facilities and public health authorities should be vigilant for possible spread of CP-CRAB via shared equipment and the potential for CP-CRAB spread to connected healthcare facilities.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document