The State of Infection Control Among Los Angeles County (LAC) Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Providers

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. S6
Author(s):  
Stacy Hartmann ◽  
Christina Eclarino ◽  
Elaine Forsyth ◽  
Roel Amara ◽  
Kelsey OYong ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Eric Rollman ◽  
Robert A. Kloner ◽  
Nichole Bosson ◽  
James T. Niemann ◽  
Marianne Gausche‐Hill ◽  
...  

Background Public health emergencies may significantly impact emergency medical services responses to cardiovascular emergencies. We compared emergency medical services responses to out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ST‐segment‒elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the 2020 COVID‐19 pandemic to 2018 to 2019 and evaluated the impact of California's March 19, 2020 stay‐at‐home order. Methods and Results We conducted a population‐based cross‐sectional study using Los Angeles County emergency medical services registry data for adult patients with paramedic provider impression (PI) of OHCA or STEMI from February through May in 2018 to 2020. After March 19, 2020, weekly counts for PI‐OHCA were higher (173 versus 135; incidence rate ratios, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19‒1.37; P <0.001) while PI‐STEMI were lower (57 versus 65; incidence rate ratios, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78‒0.97; P =0.02) compared with 2018 and 2019. After adjusting for seasonal variation in PI‐OHCA and decreased PI‐STEMI, the increase in PI‐OHCA observed after March 19, 2020 remained significant ( P =0.02). The proportion of PI‐OHCA who received defibrillation (16% versus 23%; risk difference [RD], −6.91%; 95% CI, −9.55% to −4.26%; P <0.001) and had return of spontaneous circulation (17% versus 29%; RD, −11.98%; 95% CI, −14.76% to −9.18%; P <0.001) were lower after March 19 in 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019. There was also a significant increase in dead on arrival emergency medical services responses in 2020 compared with 2018 and 2019, starting around the time of the stay‐at‐home order ( P <0.001). Conclusions Paramedics in Los Angeles County, CA responded to increased PI‐OHCA and decreased PI‐STEMI following the stay‐at‐home order. The increased PI‐OHCA was not fully explained by the reduction in PI‐STEMI. Field defibrillation and return of spontaneous circulation were lower. It is critical that public health messaging stress that emergency care should not be delayed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman ◽  
Julia M. Dixon ◽  
Nana Sefa ◽  
Arthur Yancey ◽  
Bonaventure G. Hollong ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroductionLittle is known about the existence, distribution, and characteristics of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems in Africa, or the corresponding epidemiology of prehospital illness and injury.MethodsA survey was conducted between 2013 and 2014 by distributing a detailed EMS system questionnaire to experts in paper and electronic versions. The questionnaire ascertained EMS systems’ jurisdiction, operations, finance, clinical care, resources, and regulatory environment. The discovery of respondents with requisite expertise occurred in multiple phases, including snowball sampling, a review of published scientific literature, and a rigorous search of the Internet.ResultsThe survey response rate was 46%, and data represented 49 of 54 (91%) African countries. Twenty-five EMS systems were identified and distributed among 16 countries (30% of African countries). There was no evidence of EMS systems in 33 (61%) countries. A total of 98,574,731 (8.7%) of the African population were serviced by at least one EMS system in 2012. The leading causes of EMS transport were (in order of decreasing frequency): injury, obstetric, respiratory, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal complaints. Nineteen percent of African countries had government-financed EMS systems and 26% had a toll-free public access telephone number. Basic emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and Basic Life Support (BLS)-equipped ambulances were the most common cadre of provider and ambulance level, respectively (84% each).ConclusionEmergency Medical Services systems exist in one-third of African countries. Injury and obstetric complaints are the leading African prehospital conditions. Only a minority (<9.0%) of Africans have coverage by an EMS system. Most systems were predominantly BLS, government operated, and fee-for-service.Mould-MillmanNK, DixonJM, SefaN, YanceyA, HollongBG, HagahmedM, GindeAA, WallisLA. The state of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems in Africa. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(3):273–283.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document