Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing the Impact of Implantable Loop Recorder Versus Usual Care After Ischemic Stroke for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darae Ko ◽  
Qiying Dai ◽  
David B. Flynn ◽  
Nicholas A. Bosch ◽  
Robert H. Helm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorder ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
The Impact

Meta-Analysis of Implantable Loop Recorder for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Patients With Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 115-116
Author(s):  
Babikir Kheiri ◽  
Saket Sanghai ◽  
Hani Alhamoud ◽  
Mohammed Osman ◽  
Eric Stecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implantable Loop Recorder ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Detection

Abstract 223: Impact of Differences in Once- vs Twice-Daily Medications Adherence on the Risk of Bleed and Stroke in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Randomized Trials and Claims Data Sources

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen A McHorney ◽  
Eric D Peterson ◽  
Mike Durkin ◽  
Veronica Ashton ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Cardiovascular Medications ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Similar Risk

Background: In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, those receiving once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) non vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may have better medication adherence. The impact on stroke and bleed risk is not known. Objective: To estimate the impact of adherence differences between QD vs BID therapies on bleed and stroke risks in NVAF patients. Methods: The relation between adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) for QD vs BID NOACs and one year bleed risk was modeled using claims data from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan databases (7/2012-10/2015). Next, the relation between adherence and bleeding was calibrated to match that seen in the placebo and NOAC arms of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Finally, we used adherence rates for QD (PDC=0.849) and BID (PDC=0.738) cardiovascular medications from a meta-analysis (Coleman et al.). These rates were used in the calibrated model to estimate bleeds. An analogous method was applied to evaluate the impact of QD vs BID adherence on stroke risk. Results: The relation between PDC and risks of bleed and stroke was modeled using claims data (N=65,022) and calibrated using RCTs. In the calibrated model, compared with BID dosing, QD dosing was associated with 81 fewer strokes (34% reduction) and 14 more bleeds (6% more) per 10,000 patients/year (Figure). Conclusion: Among NVAF patients, better adherence to QD dosing was associated with a significantly lower stroke risk of QD but similar risk of bleed.

Abstract 2391: Impact of Therapies for Anemia on Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure in Randomized Clinical Trials

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard M Julien ◽  
Preetika Muthukrishnan ◽  
Eldrin F Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
The Impact

Anemia is common in heart failure (HF) patients and has been well-established as a risk factor for increased risk of HF hospitalization and mortality. Treatment with erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) has increased hemoglobin, but outcomes trials are limited and use of ESA has been controversial given disparate results in other populations. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ESA and iron on outcomes in HF patients. A systematic review of four databases was conducted in April 2008 (n = 95 unique trials). Analysis inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trial to ESA/iron with clinically defined HF, yielding 10 eligible trials published between 6/01–3/08. Data was independently extracted and cross-checked for accuracy and reliability (2 investigators). A total of 768 subjects (421 treated and 338 controls) are included (Characteristics in Table 1 ). Randomization to ESA produced a significant improvement in exercise capacity 0.39 standard units [95% CI 0.1– 0.6, p = 0.001], a 5.72% [95% CI 1.2–10.3, p = 0.014] increase in left ventricle ejection fraction and a 0.23 mg/dL [95% CI 0.4 – 0.1 p = 0.001] reduction in serum creatinine. There was no difference in all-cause mortality - RR 0.79 [95% CI 0.49, 1.26, p = 0.320]. Trends were noted in reduced hospitalization rates, decreased brain natriuretic peptide, and improved quality of life. Meta-analysis of randomized studies of treatment of anemia in HF patients suggests significant benefit in exercise capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction, and serum creatinine. There does not appear to be excess mortality with ESA/iron treatment. Despite favorable findings, definitive randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the role of this treatment modality in HF management. Table 1. Baseline Patient and Study Characteristics

Abstract WMP112: Cilostazol versus Aspirin for Secondary Stroke Prevention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle P Lin ◽  
Kevin M Barrett ◽  
James F Meschia ◽  
Benjamin H Eidelman ◽  
Josephine F Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Random Effects ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Secondary Stroke Prevention

Introduction: Cilostazol has promise as an alternative to aspirin for secondary stroke prevention given its vasodilatory and anti-inflammatory properties in addition to platelet aggregation inhibition. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the comparative effectiveness and safety of cilostazol compared to aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with previous stroke or TIA. Hypothesis: Cilostazol is more effective than aspirin in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke with lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and bleeding. Methods: We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 2019. Randomized clinical trials that compared cilostazol vs aspirin and reported the endpoints of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage and bleeding were included. A random-effects estimate was computed based on Mantel-Haenszel methods. The pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were compared between cilostazol and aspirin and displayed as forest plots (Figure). Results: The search identified 5 randomized clinical trials comparing cilostazol vs aspirin for secondary stroke prevention that enrolled 7,240 patients from primarily Asian countries (3,615 received cilostazol and 3,625 received aspirin). The pooled results from the random-effects model showed that cilostazol was associated with significantly lower risk of recurrent ischemic stroke (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.70; 95%CI, 0.54-0.89), intracranial hemorrhage (HR 0.41; 95%CI, 0.25-0.65) and bleeding (HR 0.71; 95%CI, 0.55-0.91). See forest plots. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests cilostazol is more effective than aspirin in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke with lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage and bleeding. Confirmatory randomized trials of cilostazol for secondary stroke prevention to be performed in more generalizable populations are needed.

scholarly journals Acupuncture Treatments for Post-stroke Depression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lam Wai Ching ◽  
Hui Juan Li ◽  
Jianwen Guo ◽  
Liang Yao ◽  
Janita Chau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Stroke Depression ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Depression is one of the most common complications after stroke, with a prevalence of 30-33%. Patients with post-stroke depression (PSD) usually experience anxiety, hopelessness, and insomnia, which have a negative impact on their daily activities and post-stroke rehabilitation. In this review, we aimed to explore the impact of acupuncture in alleviating symptoms of PSD and to evaluate the difference in effectiveness between acupuncture combined with pharmacotherapies and various non-pharmacotherapies in order to provide guides and advice for clinical personnel. Methods: Six databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Chongqing VIP Database) and two clinical trials registration platforms were searched from inception to May 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing needle-based acupuncture with pharmacotherapy, and other non-pharmacotherapy or invalid group were included. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies. Two reviewers independently abstracted and recorded data into a pre-made form. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess and compare different techniques using RStudio 3.6.0. The primary outcome was the change in scores of scales measuring depressive symptoms. The secondary outcomes were changes in serotonin levels and in quality of life. Results: Fifty-nine RCTs were included. The results of this NMA showed that compared with western medicine (WM), acupuncture alone or with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (RTMS), Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) alone or with WM, were superior for alleviating depression symptoms. Compared to Usual Care, acupuncture alone or plus other therapies could significantly decrease scores of the Hamilton Depression Rating scale. However, there was no significant difference found among acupuncture, WM, TCM with AC plus any of other treatment.Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that acupuncture alone or combined with other therapies appear to be effective in improving depression symptoms of stroke survivors. Moreover, in comparison with WM, acupuncture alone or plus RTMS, TCM, TCM with WM, or WM, were more effective in improving depression symptoms. Also, acupuncture with RTMS seems to be the most effective with the highest probability.

Randomized clinical trials in oncology stopped early for benefit (RCTSEB)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6039-6039 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Segota ◽  
H. P. Soares ◽  
B. Djulbegovic ◽  
A. Kumar ◽  
D. Bassler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
True Positive ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Cancer Guidelines ◽  
The Impact

6039 Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCT) that stop earlier than planned because of apparent benefit often receive great attention. However, how often these early results get confirmed by other subsequent meta-analysis/randomized studies, and how often results get included in clinical guidelines is not known. We conducted systematic review of oncologic RCTSEB to further determine if the results from RCTSEB are confirmed by the subsequent studies and/or included in guidelines. Methods: RCT of any intervention reported as having stopped early because of the results favoring the intervention were previously identified (JAMA.2005;294:2203).Trials with interventions in prevention and treatment of solid and hematologic malignancies were included for this review. Citation search was conducted by two reviewers to identify meta-analysis (MA), systematic reviews (SR) and RCTs that used similar trial design as the RCTSEB. National Comprehensive Cancer Guidelines were reviewed to identify the impact of the results on recommendations on clinical practice. Results: 33 trials were identified, and 5 were excluded because they did not fit the inclusion criteria. MA/SR were available for the assessment of interventions reported in 15/28 RCTSEB. Results of subsequent MA confirmed 12/15 findings, while 3 trials were contradicted. Of the remaining 13 trials, for 7 there was at least one subsequent RCT identified. 6/7 were confirmed as beneficial in the subsequent RCTs and 1 was contradicted. For 6/28 RCTSEB we did not find any subsequent MA/SR/RCTS. We also looked at the inclusion of interventions from RCTSEB in the clinical guidelines. 18/28 interventions from RCTSEB were mentioned in the formulation of clinical guidelines.16/18 were recommended as true positive recommendations. The other 2 interventions which were addressed in the guidelines were either not confirmed (n = 1) or incorrectly recommended (n = 1). Conclusions: In this set of oncology of RCTSEBs the findings were subsequently confirmed in 64% (18/28) cases. Guidelines developers used 2/28 (7%) of RCTSEB for which reliable confirmatory data were available. However, caution should be applied in the interpretation of our results because the same RCTSEB was also included in confirmatory MAs which possibly could have introduced bias. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document