scholarly journals 951P The relationship between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in immune checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S675-S676
Author(s):  
X. Wang ◽  
M. Ballas ◽  
H. Chen ◽  
K.F. Bell ◽  
A. Slowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Relationship

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

Third- and later-line treatment in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 4409-4418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Angela Dalia Ricci ◽  
Ilaria Maggio ◽  
Maria Massucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of third-line (TLT) and salvage treatment (ST) in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Materials & methods: Eligible studies included randomized clinical trials assessing TLT and ST versus placebo or best supportive care. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival, objective response rate and disease control rate in TLT; progression-free survival in ST; grade 3–4 adverse events in ST. Results: The use of TLT and ST was superior to placebo or best supportive care in terms of prolonging overall survival and progression-free survival. Hematological toxicities were more frequent in ST. Conclusion: TLT and ST are considerable and tolerable treatment options for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Given the substantial heterogeneities affecting the efficacy analyses, these results have to be interpreted cautiously.

Efficacy of immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitor in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 1285-1292
Author(s):  
Shengqi He ◽  
Dongqing Hu ◽  
Haixia Feng ◽  
Ye Xue ◽  
Jin Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Free Survival

Aim: PD-1 inhibitors have a leading role among immunotherapy while its efficacy on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients did not reach consensus and the small sample size remains as a limitation. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis on the effects of the monotherapy anti-PD-1 inhibitors in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials & methods: We searched databases to identify studies on efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitor on CRC. Objectives were objective response rate, progression-free survival rate, disease control rate and overall survival rate with their 95% CI. Results: The overall survival rate at 1-year was 64.2% (95% CI: 0.46–0.83). Disease control rate was 56.5% (CI: 0.27–0.86) and the objective response rate as 19.7% (CI: 0.08–0.32). The 1-year-progression-free survival rate was 38.4% (CI: 0.12–0.66). Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were also conducted. Conclusion: The monotherapy anti-PD-1 inhibitors are effective in treating mCRC and could be a new option for dMMR mCRC patient in first-line treatment.

scholarly journals Temozolomide treatment of pituitary carcinomas and atypical adenomas: systematic review of case reports

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ji ◽  
Rachel Isaksson Vogel ◽  
Emil Lou
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Dna Methyltransferase ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Pituitary Carcinomas

Abstract Background Pituitary carcinomas (PC) and atypical pituitary adenomas (APA) are rare variants of pituitary tumors for which no evidence-based treatment currently exists. We sought to determine whether temozolomide represents an effective chemotherapeutic option for patients with PC and APA. Methods A systematic review was performed using all published cases of PC and APA treated with temozolomide, and for which information on treatment regimen, clinical response, and survival could be identified. The primary goal of this analysis was to describe overall survival and progression-free survival among PC and APA patients after temozolomide treatment. Secondary goals included assessment of response rate and biomarkers of response. Results We identified 57 cases and obtained follow-up data on 54 patients (31 APA and 23 PC) for analysis. Estimates of 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 21.9% and 57.4% for patients with APA and 36.1% and 56.2% for patients with PC. Among those who responded to temozolomide, overall survival was marginally statistically significantly greater for patients on long-term temozolomide therapy compared with those who were not (5-year overall survival 91.7% vs 54.1%, P = .08); Progression-free survival results were similar but not statistically significant. The objective response rate was 48.4% for patients with APA and 65.2% for patients with PC. Stable disease occurred in 29% of APA and 17.4% of PC patients. Neither histology nor expression of Ki-67 correlated with response; however, negative O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase staining was strongly related to response to temozolomide in patients with APA (P &lt; .001). Conclusions Temozolomide is an effective treatment of both PC and APA, and long-term treatment can be considered for particularly aggressive cases.

Smoking status-based efficacy difference in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 1313-1324
Author(s):  
Run-Cong Nie ◽  
Jin-Ling Duan ◽  
Yao Liang ◽  
Xiao-Jiang Chen ◽  
Yong-Ming Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Never Smoker

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between smoking status and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with conventional agents. Materials & methods: We reviewed Phase II/III trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors that reported hazard ratio (HR) in current/former and never smoking patients. Results: 15 qualifying trials comprising 9073 patients were eligible in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors correlated with prolonged progression-free survival (HR: 0.73; 0.58–0.92) and overall survival (HR: 0.75; 0.71–0.80) in current/former smoker patients but not in never-smoker patients (HR: 1.15 and 0.86 for progression-free survival and overall survival, respectively; both p > 0.05) irrespective of cancer type, target of experimental agents and treatment strategy. Conclusion: There exit smoking status-based efficacy difference in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hongqiong Yang ◽  
Yaojun Zhou ◽  
Liangzhi Wang ◽  
Tianyi Gu ◽  
Mengjia Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Five electronic databases were searched for eligible records. Outcomes were presented and analyzed according to the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate. Five records involving 2,024 participants were included in the study. The pooled analysis of OS and PFS were longer with ramucirumab (RAM) therapy than without RAM for OS (odds ratio OR = 0.90 , 95% confidence interval CI = 0.82 – 1.00 , p = 0.05 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.74 , 95 % CI = 0.57 – 0.96 , p = 0.02 ). Moreover, compared with the current first-line chemotherapy, the OS ( OR = 0.93 , 95 % CI = 0.83 – 1.04 , p = 0.19 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.82 , 95 % CI = 0.64 – 1.06 , p = 0.13 ) results were not significantly higher with RAM. The ORRs of the patients in the RAM therapy groups were significantly higher than those in the groups without RAM ( OR = 1.40 , 95 % CI = 1.14 – 1.73 , p = 0.001 ).

Therapeutic efficacy of specific immunotherapy for glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Hanaei ◽  
Khashayar Afshari ◽  
Armin Hirbod-Mobarakeh ◽  
Bahram Mohajer ◽  
Delara Amir Dastmalchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Specific Immunotherapy ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Difference

Abstract Although different immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed for the treatment of glioma, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials limiting their approval as common treatment. So, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess survival and clinical response of specific immunotherapy in patients with glioma. Generally, seven databases were searched to find eligible studies. Controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of specific immunotherapy in glioma were found eligible. After data extraction and risk of bias assessment, the data were analyzed based on the level of heterogeneity. Overall, 25 articles with 2964 patients were included. Generally, mean overall survival did not statistically improve in immunotherapy [median difference=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI)=−0.16–3.17; p=0.08]; however, it was 11.16 months higher in passive immunotherapy (95% CI=5.69–16.64; p<0.0001). One-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy groups [hazard ratio (HR)=0.69; 95% CI=0.52–0.92; p=0.01]. As the hazard rate in the immunotherapy approach was 0.83 of the control group, 2-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (HR=0.83; 95% CI=0.69–0.99; p=0.04). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy as well (HR=0.67; 95% CI=0.48–0.92; p=0.01). Overall, median progression-free survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (standard median difference=0.323; 95% CI=0.110–0.536; p=0.003). However, 1-year progression-free survival was not remarkably different between immunotherapy and control groups (HR=0.94; 95% CI=0.74–1.18; p=0.59). Specific immunotherapy demonstrated remarkable improvement in survival of patients with glioma and could be a considerable choice of treatment in the future. Despite the current promising results, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to approve immunotherapeutic approaches as the standard of care and the front-line treatment for glioma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document