Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in relation to risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events among patients undergoing angiography or cardiac revascularization: A meta-analysis of observational studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 234 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoding Wang ◽  
Guangyu Zhang ◽  
Xuejun Jiang ◽  
Hongling Zhu ◽  
Zhao Lu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo-Ming Huang ◽  
Wen-Rong Chen ◽  
Qi-Wen Su ◽  
Zhuo-Wen Huang

Background: The metabolic syndrome (MS) is significantly associated with the risk of incident heart failure (HF). However, there are still great controversies about the impact of MS on the prognosis in patients with established HF. This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effect of MS on the prognosis in patients with HF.Methods: We searched multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Opengrey, EMBASE, and Cochran Library, for potential studies up to February 15, 2021. Observational studies that reported the impact of MS on the prognosis in patients with established HF were included for meta-analysis.Results: Ten studies comprising 18,590 patients with HF were included for meta-analysis. The median follow-up duration of the included studies was 2.4 years. Compared with HF patients without MS, the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was not increased in HF with MS (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.88–1.23 for all-cause mortality; HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.56–4.88 for cardiovascular mortality, respectively). However, there was a significant increase in composited cardiovascular events in the HF patients with MS compared with those without MS (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.23–2.45).Conclusions: In patients with established HF, the presence of MS did not show an association on the risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality, while it may increase the risk of composite cardiovascular events.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongzhou Guo ◽  
Zhishuai Ye ◽  
Rongchong Huang

Background: The safety and efficacy associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) by patients with coronary artery disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remain unclear.Methods: The evaluated outcomes included combined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. A random effects meta-analysis, stratified by study design, was performed and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.Results: In total, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (6930 patients) and 16 observational studies (183,546 patients) were included. Analysis of RCTs showed that there were no significant differences in the incidences of MACEs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75–1.05]), MI (RR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.76–1.15]), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.50–1.23]) in the PPI groups vs. the non-PPI groups. Pooled data from observational studies revealed an inconsistent association between the use of each PPI subtype and the increased risks of MACEs during clopidogrel treatment. There was no increased risk of MACEs or all-cause mortality associated with the use of PPIs (as a class) and other P2Y12 inhibitors. Both the RCTs and observational studies revealed that the use of PPIs significantly reduced the risks of GI bleeding.Conclusion: The use of PPIs was associated with a reduced risk of GI bleeding in patients treated with DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention or acute coronary syndrome. There was no clear evidence of an association between the use of PPIs and adverse cardiovascular events.Clinical Trial Registration: identifier [CRD42020190315]


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Jin ◽  
Xiaoyang Guo ◽  
Qiyao Yu

Background: The effects of beta-blockers are uncertain in dialysis patients. Except antihypertension, β-blockers may play a unique cardiovascular protective role in the population. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of β-blockers therapy in adult patients treated with dialysis. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library from inception to May 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies about the role of β-blockers on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular events, or hospitalizations in dialysis population. Results: Three RCTs and 9 observational studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The RCTs showed significant association between β-blockers and reduced all-cause mortality (n = 363; risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% CI 0.54–0.97), cardiovascular mortality (n = 314; RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.29–0.68), cardiovascular events (n = 363; RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.31–0.88), or hospitalizations (n = 314; RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48–0.78) in dialysis patients. The observational studies showed significant difference in all-cause mortality (n = 35,233; hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% CI 0.80–0.92) between β-blockers and no β-blockers therapy in patients with dialysis, while the studies showed no difference in cardiovascular mortality (n = 19,413; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.57–1.11), or cardiovascular events (n = 87,060; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.50–1.26). Conclusions: β-blockers seem to be associated with reduced mortality in patients on dialysis. Both the statistical heterogeneity in observational studies and the small number of participants and studies in RCTs limit the strength of these findings. Video Journal Club “Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco” at  https://www.karger.com/Journal/ArticleNews/496083?sponsor=52


Author(s):  
Nader Makki ◽  
Wassef Karrowni

Importance: There has been increasing interest in use of testosterone therapy (TT) beyond patients with hypogonadism to include younger men without documented hormone measurements for the purpose of improving libido, sexual function, bone density, and body mass. However, there is no conclusive data about safety of TT due to lack of adequately powered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) specifically designed for this purpose. Objective: To examine the overall risk of cardiovascular events associated with TT via meta-analysis of published randomized and observational studies. Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the National Institute of Health Clinical Trials.gov database from 1966 to 2014. Study Selection: Out of the initial 2,800 studies identified, we obtained a total of 34 studies for detailed analysis after applying our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two reviewers used eligibility criteria to assess all titles, abstracts, and full texts and resolved disagreements by discussion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: One reviewer did data abstractions and quality assessments, which were confirmed by a second reviewer. Data were then collected and analyzed using random and fixed effect model, as appropriate. Risk estimates were extracted as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) from included studies. Main Outcome and Measures: Association of TT with cardiovascular events as a primary endpoint and association of TT with ischemic heart disease, all-cause mortality and cerebrovascular events as secondary endpoints. Results: TT was associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.19-1.67, p = 0.0004), all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.03-1.62, p = 0.02), and ischemic heart disease (adjusted HR=1.51, 95% CI = 1.05-2.18, p = 0.02) but there was no clear association with cerebrovascular events (adjusted HR=0.91, 95% CI = 0.66-1.25, p=0.54).  Subgroup analyses of our primary endpoint by study type (randomized versus observational studies) did not change our results (adjusted HR=1.40, 95% CI = 1.05-1.87, p = 0.02 and adjusted HR=1.54, 95% CI = 1.09-2.17, p = 0.01 respectively). Additional analysis using meta-regression and sensitivity analyses to account for factors such as history of prior CV events, indication for TT and duration of follow up did not change our results. However, we did notice lack of association between CV events and Intramuscular testosterone. Conclusions and Relevance: TT may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and ischemic heart disease. These findings support the need for an adequately powered randomized study.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document