scholarly journals Corrigendum to ’Decellularized disc hydrogels for hBMSC tissue-specific differentiation and tissue regeneration’ [Bioactive Materials 6 (2021) 3541–3556]

Author(s):  
Yizhong Peng ◽  
Xiangcheng Qing ◽  
Hui Lin ◽  
Donghua Huang ◽  
Jinye Li ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 3541-3556
Author(s):  
Yizhong Peng ◽  
Xiangcheng Qing ◽  
Hui Lin ◽  
Donghua Huang ◽  
Jinye Li ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
Paola Serrano Martinez ◽  
Lorena Giuranno ◽  
Marc Vooijs ◽  
Robert P. Coppes

Radiotherapy is involved in the treatment of many cancers, but damage induced to the surrounding normal tissue is often inevitable. Evidence suggests that the maintenance of homeostasis and regeneration of the normal tissue is driven by specific adult tissue stem/progenitor cells. These tasks involve the input from several signaling pathways. Irradiation also targets these stem/progenitor cells, triggering a cellular response aimed at achieving tissue regeneration. Here we discuss the currently used in vitro and in vivo models and the involved specific tissue stem/progenitor cell signaling pathways to study the response to irradiation. The combination of the use of complex in vitro models that offer high in vivo resemblance and lineage tracing models, which address organ complexity constitute potential tools for the study of the stem/progenitor cellular response post-irradiation. The Notch, Wnt, Hippo, Hedgehog, and autophagy signaling pathways have been found as crucial for driving stem/progenitor radiation-induced tissue regeneration. We review how these signaling pathways drive the response of solid tissue-specific stem/progenitor cells to radiotherapy and the used models to address this.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahlm Kwon ◽  
Yonggoo Kim ◽  
Myungshin Kim ◽  
Jiyeon Kim ◽  
Hayoung Choi ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (15) ◽  
pp. 8650-8655 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-Y. Choi ◽  
J. Pratap ◽  
A. Javed ◽  
S. K. Zaidi ◽  
L. Xing ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.T. Franceschi

Bone formation is a carefully controlled developmental process involving morphogen-mediated patterning signals that define areas of initial mesenchyme condensation followed by induction of cell-specific differentiation programs to produce chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Positional information is conveyed via gradients of molecules, such as Sonic Hedgehog that are released from cells within a particular morphogenic field together with region-specific patterns of hox gene expression. These, in turn, regulate the localized production of bone morphogenetic proteins and related molecules which initiate chondrocyte- and osteoblast-specific differentiation programs. Differentiation requires the initial commitment of mesenchymal stem cells to a given lineage, followed by induction of tissue-specific patterns of gene expression. Considerable information about the control of osteoblast-specific gene expression has come from analysis of the promoter regions of genes encoding proteins like osteocalcin that are selectively expressed in bone. Both general and tissue-specific transcription factors control this promoter. Osf2/Cbfal, the first osteoblast-specific transcription factor to be identified, is expressed early in the osteoblast lineage and interacts with specific DNA sequences in the osteocalcin promoter essential for its selective expression in osteoblasts. The OSF2/CBFA1 gene is necessary for the development of mineralized tissues, and its mutation causes the human disease, cleidocranial dysplasia. Committed osteoprogenitor cells already expressing Osf2/Cbfa1 must synthesize a collagenous ECM before they will differentiate. A ceII:ECM interaction mediated by integrin-type cell-surface receptors is essential for the induction of osteocalcin and other osteoblast-related proteins. This interaction stimulates the binding of Osf2/Cbfa 1 to the osteocalcin promoter through an as-yet-undefined mechanism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document