scholarly journals Repeat treatment of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors following prior progression on a checkpoint inhibitor regimen: a case series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Jindal ◽  
Jonathan Chou ◽  
Terence Friedlander ◽  
Pedro C Barata ◽  
Vadim S Koshkin
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Repeat Treatment ◽  
Inhibitor Regimen ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

scholarly journals First-Line Chemotherapy Response Is a Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma, a Real World Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Ri Li ◽  
Shian-Shiang Wang ◽  
Kevin Lu ◽  
Chuan-Shu Chen ◽  
Chen-Li Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The Other ◽  
Chemotherapy Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become important tools for the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). However, the clinical strategy using ICIs and chemotherapy is still controversy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of clinical parameters in aUC patients with ICIs treatment.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed aUC patients who received atezolizumab and pembrolizumab between January 2015 and October 2020. The associations between baseline demographics and clinical outcomes were evaluated.Results: Of the 74 included patients, the median age was 67 years. Among them, 53 patients received atezolizumab and the other 21 received pembrolizumab. There were 50 patients receiving first line ICIs therapy and the other 24 received second line monotherapy. Fifty-two (83.87%, 52/62) received cisplatin among all chemotherapy patients. The median progression free survival was 10.94 months and the overall survival was 28.44 months. Poor chemotherapy response or no chemotherapy, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with higher risk of diseases progression (HR=5.70, 95% CI 2.04-15.90, p=0.001, HR=6.08, 95% CI 1.79-20.57, p=0.004; HR=5.40, 95% CI 1.76-16.57, p=0.003; HR=6.08, 95% CI 2.56-14.44, p<0.001 and HR= 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, P=0.002 respectively). Liver metastases and WBC before ICI were associated with increased death risk (HR=11.95, 95%CI 3.22-44.34, p<0.001; HR=1.0001, 95% CI 1.00001-1.00002, p=0.036 respectively) while ICI response was associated with decreased death (HR=0.22, 95%CI 0.08-0.62, p=0.004). Chemotherapy responders were associated with better ICI treatment response (OR=6.52, 95%CI 1.45-29.24, p=0.014) while lymph node metastases and poor ECOG was associated with poor ICI response (OR=0.31, 95%CI 0.10-0.94, p=0.038; OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.11-0.95, p=0.040).Conclusions: Our data showed predictive role of first-line chemotherapy response to ICIs treatment efficacy in aUC patients as well as other prognostic factors, such as ECOG status, serum white blood cell count or NLR and liver metastases.

scholarly journals Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of the Current Evidence

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5517
Author(s):  
Sara Elena Rebuzzi ◽  
Giuseppe Luigi Banna ◽  
Veronica Murianni ◽  
Alessandra Damassi ◽  
Emilio Francesco Giunta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Concomitant Medications ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

In recent years, the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma has significantly changed due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are the standard of care for second-line treatment and first-line platinum-ineligible patients with advanced disease. Despite the overall survival improvement, only a minority of patients benefit from this immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an unmet need to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers or models to select patients who will benefit from ICIs, especially in view of novel therapeutic agents. This review describes the prognostic and predictive role, and clinical readiness, of clinical and tumour factors, including new molecular classes, tumour mutational burden, mutational signatures, circulating tumour DNA, programmed death-ligand 1, inflammatory indices and clinical characteristics for patients with urothelial cancer treated with ICIs. A classification of these factors according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation currently indicates both a prognostic and predictive value for ctDNA and a prognostic relevance only for concomitant medications and patients’ characteristics.

scholarly journals Immunotherapy in urothelial cancer: recent data and perspectives

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Volkova ◽  
Ya. V. Gridneva ◽  
A. S. Ol’shanskaya
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Programmed Death 1 ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors blocking the programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have shown a prominent anti-tumor activity with long-term responses and an acceptable toxicity profile  in clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and durvalumab are anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents that redefine the standard of care for advanced urothelial carcinoma. CTLA-4 inhibitors are also under investigation in this setting. Phase III trial KEYNOTE-045 has demonstrated significant survival benefit in patients treated with pembrolizumab comparing with the standard second-line chemotherapy. Atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and durvalumab were also recommended for platinum-pretreated urothelial carcinoma patients based on phase II data. Following investigations of biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression are needed to determine high-responders to immunotherapy. This review article describes the advances in immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 519-519
Author(s):  
Seung-Hoon Beom ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Joong Bae Ahn ◽  
Sang Joon Shin
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

519 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are active in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma which progressed to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recent data suggest that exposure to ICI improves response to salvage chemotherapy (SCT) in several cancer types. Here we evaluated whether PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors affect the antitumor effects of SCT after ICI in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Yonsei Cancer Center. Eligibility criteria were patients who received at least one SCT as 3rd-line or beyond, following progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI and for whom efficacy data were available between January 2017 and September 2019. We evaluated efficacy outcomes to each therapy, including ORR by RECIST version 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 35 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses. ICIs were given as monotherapy and they were administrated as second-line in 48% and as later line in 52%. Twenty-six patients (74%) received a anti-PD-L1 inhibitor and 9 (26%) did a anti-PD-1 inhibitor. SCT included single paclitaxel (60%), MVAC (26%), gemcitabine/platinum combination (9%), and pemetrexed (6%). The ORR to SCT was 26%. Among 9 patients who received MVAC, 5 (55.5%) achieved a partial response. Median progression-free survival was 2.5 months and median overall survival was 7.8 months. A number of prior chemotherapy regimens was associated with response to SCT on univariate analysis. Conclusions: In urothelial cancer patients, the confirmed ORR (26%) to SCT after ICI exposure was higher as compared to historical data from the pre-ICI era. These data indicate that anti–PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could make tumors more vulnerable to subsequent chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced aseptic meningitis and encephalitis: a case-series and narrative review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204209862110047
Author(s):  
Laure Thouvenin ◽  
Timothée Olivier ◽  
Giuseppe Banna ◽  
Alfredo Addeo ◽  
Alex Friedlaender
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Aseptic Meningitis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Wide Range

Background: Along with the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors comes a surge in immune-related toxicity. Here, we review the currently available data regarding neurological immune adverse events, and more specifically aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, and present treatment and diagnostic recommendations. Furthermore, we present five cases of immunotherapy-induced aseptic meningitis and encephalitis treated at our institution. Recent findings: Neurological immune-related adverse events, including aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, secondary to checkpoint inhibitors are a rare but complex and clinically relevant entity, comprising a wide range of diseases, most often presenting with symptoms with a wide range of differential diagnoses. Our case-series highlights the challenges of such entities and the importance of properly identifying and managing aseptic meningitis and encephalitis. Summary: Checkpoint inhibitor-induced meningoencephalitis warrants prompt investigations and treatment. Properly diagnosing aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, or mixed presentations may guide the treatment decision, as highlighted by our case-series. After rapid exclusion of alternative diagnoses, urgent corticosteroids are the therapeutic backbone but this could change in favour of highly specific cytokine-directed treatment options. Plain language summary Aseptic meningitis and encephalitis with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single centre case-series and review of the literature Over the course of the past decade, checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care. With their favourable toxicity profile and potential for durable and deep responses, they have become ubiquitous across the field of oncology. Furthermore, combination checkpoint inhibitors are also gaining ground, with increased efficacy and, unfortunately, immune-related toxicity. While there are guidelines based on extensive clinical experience for frequent adverse events, uncommon entities are less readily identified and treated. Neurological immune-related adverse events secondary to checkpoint inhibitors are a rare but complex entity, comprising a wide range of diseases, most often presenting with aspecific symptoms. In this paper, we discuss a single institution case-series of patients with autoimmune aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, and we perform a narrative literature review on this subject. We conclude with our treatment recommendations based on available evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document