IS 35. Multimodal approaches: Structural/molecular/genetics synaptic and molecular mechanisms of direct current stimulation-implications for motor learning and neurorehabilitation

2013 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. e50
Author(s):  
J. Reis
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gessica Sala ◽  
Tommaso Bocci ◽  
Valentina Borzì ◽  
Marta Parazzini ◽  
Alberto Priori ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (DCS) is currently proposed as a symptomatic treatment in Parkinson’s disease, the intracellular and molecular mechanisms elicited by this technique are still unknown, and its disease-modifying potential unexplored. Aim of this study was to elucidate the on-line and off-line effects of DCS on the expression, aggregation and degradation of alpha-synuclein (asyn) in a human neuroblastoma cell line under basal conditions and in presence of pharmachologically-induced increased asyn levels. Following DCS, gene and protein expression of asyn and its main autophagic catabolic pathways were assessed by real-time PCR and Western blot, extracellular asyn levels by Dot blot. We found that, under standard conditions, DCS increased monomeric and reduced oligomeric asyn forms, with a concomitant down-regulation of both macroautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy. Differently, in presence of rotenone-induced increased asyn, DCS efficiently counteracted asyn accumulation, not acting on its gene transcription, but potentiating its degradation. DCS also reduced intracellular and extracellular asyn levels, increased following lysosomal inhibition, independently from autophagic degradation, suggesting that other mechanisms are also involved. Collectively, these findings suggest that DCS exerts on-line and off-line effects on the expression, aggregation and autophagic degradation of asyn, indicating a till unknown neuroprotective role of tDCS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauran Cole ◽  
Adrianna Giuffre ◽  
Patrick Ciechanski ◽  
Helen L. Carlson ◽  
Ephrem Zewdie ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 2119-2126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Naros ◽  
Marc Geyer ◽  
Susanne Koch ◽  
Lena Mayr ◽  
Tabea Ellinger ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mana Biabani ◽  
Michael Farrell ◽  
Maryam Zoghi ◽  
Gary Egan ◽  
Shapour Jaberzadeh

Abstract Crossover designs are used by a high proportion of studies investigating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor learning. These designs necessitate attention to aspects of data collection and analysis to take account of design-related confounds including order, carryover, and period effects. In this systematic review, we appraised the method sections of crossover-designed tDCS studies of motor learning and discussed the strategies adopted to address these factors. A systematic search of 10 databases was performed and 19 research papers, including 21 experimental studies, were identified. Potential risks of bias were addressed in all of the studies, however, not in a rigorous and structured manner. In the data collection phase, unclear methods of randomization, various lengths of washout period, and inconsistency in the counteracting period effect can be observed. In the analytical procedures, the stratification by sequence group was often ignored, and data were treated as if it belongs to a simple repeated-measures design. An inappropriate use of crossover design can seriously affect the findings and therefore the conclusions drawn from tDCS studies on motor learning. The results indicate a pressing need for the development of detailed guidelines for this type of studies to benefit from the advantages of a crossover design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document