The role of attention in the facilitation effect and another “inhibition of return”

Cognition ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. B42-B50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanae Okamoto-Barth ◽  
Nobuyuki Kawai
Keyword(s):  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Facilitation Effect

A Direct Assessment of the Role of Expectation in Inhibition of Return

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 783-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Spalek
Keyword(s):  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Direct Measure ◽  
Imaginary Circle ◽  
Direct Assessment ◽  
Relevant Evidence ◽  
Indirect Measures

An object hidden among distractors can be found more efficiently if previously searched locations are not reinspected. The inhibition-of-return (IOR) phenomenon indexes the tendency to avoid reinspections. Two accounts of IOR, that it is due to inhibition and that it is due to expectation, are generally regarded as incompatible. The relevant evidence to date, however, has been indirect: Inhibition or expectation has been inferred from response times or similar indirect measures. This article reports the first direct measure of IOR, obtained by asking observers to predict the location of the next target in a display containing eight possible locations on an imaginary circle. On any given trial, the previously cued location was chosen less frequently (impairment)—and the opposite location was chosen more frequently (facilitation)—than chance (choice of all other locations was at chance). The impairment is consistent with both inhibition and expectation accounts; the facilitation is consistent only with expectation accounts. This work also shows that inhibition and expectation are not necessarily incompatible: Implementing expectations may entail inhibiting previously cued locations.

scholarly journals Endogenous orienting in the archer fish

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (29) ◽  
pp. 7577-7581 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Saban ◽  
Liora Sekely ◽  
Raymond M. Klein ◽  
Shai Gabay
Keyword(s):  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Volitional Control ◽  
Reflexive Orienting ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Endogenous Orienting ◽  
Attention Orienting ◽  
Spatial Orienting ◽  
Human Attention ◽  
Human Participants

The literature has long emphasized the neocortex’s role in volitional processes. In this work, we examined endogenous orienting in an evolutionarily older species, the archer fish, which lacks neocortex-like cells. We used Posner’s classic endogenous cuing task, in which a centrally presented, spatially informative cue is followed by a target. The fish responded to the target by shooting a stream of water at it. Interestingly, the fish demonstrated a human-like “volitional” facilitation effect: their reaction times to targets that appeared on the side indicated by the precue were faster than their reaction times to targets on the opposite side. The fish also exhibited inhibition of return, an aftermath of orienting that commonly emerges only in reflexive orienting tasks in human participants. We believe that this pattern demonstrates the acquisition of an arbitrary connection between spatial orienting and a nonspatial feature of a centrally presented stimulus in nonprimate species. In the literature on human attention, orienting in response to such contingencies has been strongly associated with volitional control. We discuss the implications of these results for the evolution of orienting, and for the study of volitional processes in all species, including humans.

scholarly journals The role of cue processing in advancing the onset of inhibition of return

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1072
Author(s):  
Andrew Rodriguez ◽  
Brittney Hernandez ◽  
Eriko Self
Keyword(s):  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Cue Processing

The Role of Hand Movement in Spatial Serial Order Memory

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-335
Author(s):  
Yangke Zhao ◽  
Chuansheng Chen ◽  
Xiuying Qian
Keyword(s):  
Hand Movement ◽  
Serial Order ◽  
Hand Movements ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Serial Memory ◽  
Backward Recall ◽  
Passive Viewing ◽  
Memory Experiment ◽  
Serial Order Memory

Abstract Research on serial order memory has traditionally used tasks where participants passively view the items. A few studies that included hand movement showed that such movement interfered with serial order memory. In the present study of three experiments, we investigated whether and how hand movements improved spatial serial order memory. Experiment 1 showed that manual tracing (i.e., hand movements that traced the presentation of stimuli on the modified eCorsi block tapping task) improved the performance of backward recall as compared to no manual tracing (the control condition). Experiment 2 showed that the facilitation effect resulted from voluntary hand movements and could not be achieved via passive viewing of another person’s manual tracing. Experiment 3 showed that it was the temporal, not the spatial, signal within manual tracing that facilitated spatial serial memory.

The causal role of the left parietal lobe in facilitation and inhibition of return

Cortex ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 311-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Martín-Arévalo ◽  
J. Lupiáñez ◽  
C. Narganes-Pineda ◽  
G. Marino ◽  
I. Colás ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Parietal Lobe ◽  
Causal Role

scholarly journals What Neuroscientific Studies Tell Us about Inhibition of Return

Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Satel ◽  
Nicholas R. Wilson ◽  
Raymond M. Klein
Keyword(s):  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Direct Methods ◽  
Brain Structures ◽  
Developmental Studies ◽  
Unit Recording ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Lesion Studies

An inhibitory aftermath of orienting, inhibition of return (IOR), has intrigued scholars since its discovery about 40 years ago. Since then, the phenomenon has been subjected to a wide range of neuroscientific methods and the results of these are reviewed in this paper. These include direct manipulations of brain structures (which occur naturally in brain damage and disease or experimentally as in TMS and lesion studies) and measurements of brain activity (in humans using EEG and fMRI and in animals using single unit recording). A variety of less direct methods (e.g., computational modeling, developmental studies, etc.) have also been used. The findings from this wide range of methods support the critical role of subcortical and cortical oculomotor pathways in the generation and nature of IOR.

Inhibition of Return Arises from Inhibition of Response Processes: An Analysis of Oscillatory Beta Activity

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Pastötter ◽  
Simon Hanslmayr ◽  
Karl-Heinz Bäuml
Keyword(s):  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Discrimination Task ◽  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Beta Activity ◽  
Movement Execution ◽  
Preceding Stimulus ◽  
Beta Power ◽  
Target Design

In the orienting of attention paradigm, inhibition of return (IOR) refers to slowed responses to targets presented at the same location as a preceding stimulus. No consensus has yet been reached regarding the stages of information processing underlying the inhibition. We report the results of an electro-encephalogram experiment designed to examine the involvement of response inhibition in IOR. Using a cue-target design and a target-target design, we addressed the role of response inhibition in a location discrimination task. Event-related changes in beta power were measured because oscillatory beta activity has been shown to be related to motor activity. Bilaterally located sources in the primary motor cortex showed event-related beta desynchronization (ERD) both at cue and target presentation and a rebound to event-related beta synchronization (ERS) after movement execution. In both designs, IOR arose from an enhancement of beta synchrony. IOR was related to an increase of beta ERS in the target-target design and to a decrease of beta ERD in the cue-target design. These results suggest an important role of response inhibition in IOR.

Inhibition of Return, but Not Facilitation, Disappears Under Vigilance Decrease Due to Sleep Deprivation

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Martella ◽  
Andrea Marotta ◽  
Luis J. Fuentes ◽  
Maria Casagrande
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Deprivation ◽  
Inhibition Of Return ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Attentional Orienting ◽  
Target Interval ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Peripheral Cues ◽  
Endogenous Component ◽  
Phasic Alerting

In this study, we assessed whether unspecific attention processes signaled by general reaction times (RTs), as well as specific facilitatory (validity or facilitation effect) and inhibitory (inhibition of return, IOR) effects involved in the attentional orienting network, are affected by low vigilance due to both circadian factors and sleep deprivation (SD). Eighteen male participants performed a cuing task in which peripheral cues were nonpredictive about the target location and the cue-target interval varied at three levels: 200 ms, 800 ms, and 1,100 ms. Facilitation with the shortest and IOR with the longest cue-target intervals were observed in the baseline session, thus replicating previous related studies. Under SD condition, RTs were generally slower, indicating a reduction in the participants’ arousal level. The inclusion of a phasic alerting tone in several trials partially compensated for the reduction in tonic alertness, but not with the longest cue-target interval. With regard to orienting, whereas the facilitation effect due to reflexive shifts of attention was preserved with sleep loss, the IOR was not observed. These results suggest that the decrease of vigilance produced by SD affects both the compensatory effects of phasic alerting and the endogenous component involved in disengaging attention from the cued location, a requisite for the IOR effect being observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document