scholarly journals Game of pure chance with restricted boundary

2020 ◽  
Vol 283 ◽  
pp. 613-625
Author(s):  
Ho-Hon Leung ◽  
Thotsaporn “Aek” Thanatipanonda
Keyword(s):  
Paleobiology ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Rosenzweig ◽  
Robert D. McCord

Evolutionary progress is a trend that relaxes trade-off rules. It begins with the evolution of a key adaptation. It continues with the spread of the key adaptation as the clade that contains it replaces some older clade that lacks it. Key adaptations are those that allow for improvement in at least one organismal function at a reduced fitness cost in other functions.Replacement almost certainly involves more than pure chance. It may not often involve competitive extinction. Instead, species from the new clade produce new species to replace already extinct species from the old clade. The key adaptation gives them a higher competitive speciation rate than old-clade sources of replacement. The process, termed incumbent replacement, proceeds at a rate limited by extinction rate. Thus, replacement often seems linked to mass extinction events.The incumbent-replacement hypothesis explains what we know about the replacement of straight-neck turtles (Amphichelydia) by those that can flex their necks and protect their heads in their shells. This replacement occurred four or five times in different biotic provinces. It happened as long ago as the Cretaceous in Eurasia, and as recently as the Pleistocene in mainland Australia. It was accomplished in Gondwanaland by turtles flexing their necks sideways (Pleurodira), and in the north by those flexing their necks into an S-curve (Cryptodira). As is typical of replacements, amphichelydian replacement took millions of years to accomplish wherever it occurred, and much of it in North America took place in a burst associated with and immediately subsequent to a mass extinction.


Author(s):  
David J. Bartholomew

In many quarters God and chance are still seen as mutually exclusive alternatives. It is common to hear that ascribing anything to “chance” rules out God’s action. Recent scientific developments have tended to reinforce that distinction. Quantum theory introduced an irreducible uncertainty at the atomic level by requiring that certain microscopic physical events were unpredictable in principle. This was followed by the biologists’ claim that mutations, on which evolution depends, were effectively random and hence that evolutionary development was undirected. The problem this posed to Christian apologists was put most forcibly by Jacques Monod when he asserted “Pure chance,… at the root of the stupendous edifice of evolution alone is the source of every innovation.” Several attempts have been made to include chance within a theistic account. One, advocated by the intelligent design movement, is to contend that some biological structures are too complex to have originated in the way that evolutionary theory supposes and therefore that they must be attributed to God. Another is to suppose that God acts in an undetectable way at the quantum level without destroying the random appearance of what goes on there. A third approach is to contend that chance is real and hence is a means by which God works. A key step in this argument is the recognition that chance and order are not mutually exclusive. Reality operates at a number of different levels of aggregation so that what is attributable to chance at one level emerges as near certainty at a higher level. Further arguments, based on what is known as the anthropic principle, are also used to judge whether or not chance is sufficient to account for existence. These are critically evaluated.


2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (A) ◽  
pp. 222-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaolin Shi ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Guomin Zhang

The annual earthquake predictions of the China Seismological Bureau (CSB) are evaluated by means of an R score (an R score is approximately 0 for completely random guesses, and approximately 1 for completely successful predictions). The average R score of the annual predictions in China in the period 1990–1998 is about 0.184, significantly larger than 0.0. However, background seismicity is higher in seismically active regions. If a ‘random guess' prediction is chosen to be proportional to the background seismicity, the expected R score is 0.123, and the nine-year mean R score of 0.184 as observed is only marginally higher than this background value. Monte Carlo tests indicate that the probability of attaining an R score of actual prediction by background seismicity based on random guess is about . It is concluded that earthquake prediction in China is still in a very preliminary stage, barely above a pure chance level.


2008 ◽  
Vol 197 (2648) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
Mark Buchanan
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Haller ◽  
Heinz Arnheiter ◽  
Jovan Pavlovic ◽  
Peter Staeheli

The discovery of the Mx gene–dependent, innate resistance of mice against influenza virus was a matter of pure chance. Although the subsequent analysis of this antiviral resistance was guided by straightforward logic, it nevertheless led us into many blind alleys and was full of surprising turns and twists. Unexpectedly, this research resulted in the identification of one of the first interferon-stimulated genes and provided a new view of interferon action. It also showed that in many species, MX proteins have activities against a broad range of viruses. To this day, Mx research continues to flourish and to provide insights into the never-ending battle between viruses and their hosts.


Geophysics ◽  
1948 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Maurice Tripp

A method is proposed and described whereby it is possible to examine statistically the data from a geophysical survey to determine the relative probability of its occurring as a result of pure chance. When the probability is less than 0.01, a technique is outlined for further “reducing” the data in an objective manner and testing anomalous areas for significance. The method is particularly applicable to highly variable data which result from random background fluctuations found in some of the modern prospecting techniques.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karunyan Arulanantham ◽  
Michael S. Kramer ◽  
Joyce D. Gryboski

Five patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) had abnormalities of the X chromosome (the Turner syndrome). Based on the estimated prevalence rate of 1:10,000 live female births for the Turner syndrome and 1:50,000 for IBD, random association of these two conditions would be expected in 1:500 million live female births. Given these odds, the findings in these five patients would suggest a clinical association not based on pure chance and unlikely to be accounted for by Berkson's or other referral bias. It is speculated that abnormal immune mechanism could possibly increase the susceptibility of patients with the Turner syndrome to develop IBD. Both conditions cause growth failure. Awareness of the association has clinical importance in identifying the cause of growth failure in a child with either X chromosomal abnormality or IBD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 470-475
Author(s):  
Ashna Arora ◽  
Leonard Goff ◽  
Jonas Hjort

Do workers' first jobs affect their careers? Do such first-job effects (FJEs) vary across worker types? If so, can policy improve upon a “free” labor market by altering initial worker-employer matches? We study these questions using Norway's pre-2013 system of assigning doctors to their first job–residencies–through a random serial dictatorship. This generated individual-level variation in workers' choice sets over employers, which we use as instrumental variables to estimate FJEs. We then decompose workers' preferences over first employers into FJEs-on-earnings and employer “amenity value” components, showing how matches and worker welfare changed in the post-2013 decentralized labor market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document